Complications From the Use of Calcium Phosphate Paste in Mandibular Lengthening Osteotomies

December 11, 2025 updated by: Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Prospective Study: Complications From the Use of Calcium Phosphate Paste in Mandibular Lengthening Osteotomies

The goal of this study is to determine if the use of calcium phosphate paste in mandibular lengthening surgery causes more complications as surgical site infections and hardware removal.

An evaluation will be made to determine if the benefits of the use of the paste (3D-stability, prevention of early relapse and unaesthetic indentation) outweighs the disadvantages.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) is commonly used to correct dentofacial discrepancies. Correction of distocclusion can be achieved through lengthening of the mandible, and a balanced facial appearance can be obtained by increasing chin projection.

Calcium phosphate paste is used in mandibular lengthening surgery to avoid an unaesthetic notching at the lower border(1)(2) and to help stabilize the segments when osteosynthesis slippage is feared for. A recently performed retrospective study showed an increase of infectious complications when calcium phosphate paste was used for this indications. Several precautions were identified that could be undertaken to decrease the infectious complications. The study concluded that a prospective study was required in which these precautions were implemented to determine whether infectious complications can be reduced.

The aim of this study is to investigate whether the hardened paste still increases the incidence of site infections after implementation of several precautions and the use of a standardized antibiotic prophylactic protocol.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

196

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Brussels Capital
      • Jette, Brussels Capital, Belgium, 1090
        • Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 75 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients undergoing bilateral sagittal split osteotomy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients with dysgnatic deformities requiring mandibular lengthening surgery
  • Gender: M/F
  • Age: >15y-75y

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous orthognathic surgery
  • Congenital facial malformations
  • Unilateral SSO
  • Immunodeficiency
  • Simultaneous removal of lower third molars
  • Incomplete postoperative follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Standard sagittal split osteotomy group
Patients undergoing sagittal split osteotomy without paste application
Calcium phosphate paste is used in mandibular lengthening surgery to avoid an unaesthetic notching at the lower border and to help stabilize the segments when osteosynthesis slippage is feared for.
The sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) is commonly used to correct dentofacial discrepancies.
Cohort/Hydroset group
Patients undergoing sagittal split osteotomy with paste application
Calcium phosphate paste is used in mandibular lengthening surgery to avoid an unaesthetic notching at the lower border and to help stabilize the segments when osteosynthesis slippage is feared for.
The sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) is commonly used to correct dentofacial discrepancies.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical site infection
Time Frame: 6 months
Determine the number of surgical site infection
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hardware removal
Time Frame: 6 months
Determine the number of hardware removal
6 months
Revision
Time Frame: 6 months
Determine the number of revisions
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erica Coppey, Dr., Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
  • Study Director: Maurice Mommaerts, Prof.Dr.Mult, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

September 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Calciumfosfaat cement

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infection

Subscribe