- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02925676
Evaluation of the Hypoglycaemia Notification Device Hyposafe H02
Evaluation of the Hypoglycaemia Notification Device Hyposafe H02 - the Pilot 2 Study - in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
While a finger prick test accurately measures the blood glucose level, it does not provide continuous measurements and hence it is unreliable as a hypoglycaemia notification. Recent studies have indicated that the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) reduces the risk of severe hypoglycaemia. However, some find these devices troublesome to use and are annoyed by the inaccuracy of the measurements and even after short-term use the coverage in subgroups of patients is as low as 50% of the time. Thus, there is a medical need for a reliable hypoglycaemia notification which is easy and convenient to use and with high sensitivity and high rate of positive prediction.
This clinical investigation is designed to evaluate the sensitivity and the positive predictive value of the Hyposafe H02 in subjects with type 1 diabetes during everyday activities and during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. In addition, the investigation provides information regarding safety and usability of the device. This to verify that the Hyposafe H02 works as intended in subjects with type 1 diabetes before proceeding with a larger study in subjects with type 1 diabetes.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hillerød, Denmark
- North Zealand Hospital
-
Odense, Denmark, 5000
- Odense University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Informed consent obtained before any study related activities
- Type 1 diabetes diagnosed at least five years prior to inclusion in the study
- Impaired awareness and/or history of at least one severe hypoglycaemia within the preceding year
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe cardiac disease
- History of stroke or cerebral haemorrhage and any other structural cerebral disease
- Active cancer or cancer diagnosis within the past 5 years
- Uraemia defined as s-creatinine ≥ 3 times upper reference value
- Liver disease defined as s-ALAT ≥ 3 times upper reference interval
- Epilepsy
- Use of antiepileptic drugs for any indication
- Clinically important hearing impairment
- Use of active implantable medical device including pacemaker and ICD-unit and cochlear implant
- Use of following drugs: Chemotherapeutic drugs of any kind, Methotrexate, Third generation antipsychotic drugs (aripiprazole, quetiapine, clozapine, ziprasidone, paliperidone, risperidone, sertindole, amisulpride, olanzapine)
- Contraindications to the local anaesthetic used during implantation
- Known or suspected abuse of alcohol or any other neuro-active substances
- Infection at the site of device implantation
- Any haemorrhagic disease
- Females of childbearing potential who are pregnant or intend to become pregnant or are not using adequate contraceptive methods throughout the study
- Performing extreme sport, including scuba diving (snorkel diving is allowed) or parachute jumping
- Incapable of understanding the subject information or unlikely to complete the study for any reason
- Operating MRI scanners
- Operating handheld transceivers for communication (e.g. within the police, medical, fire, air traffic control, marine or military)
- Working at broadcast stations for television or FM/DAB radio
- Use of CGM or FGM with visible glucose measurements and activated glucose notifications
- Involved in therapies with medical devices that deliver electrical energy into the area around the implant
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: hyposafe H02
All subjects included are assigned to hyposafe H02-testing
|
hypoglycaemia notification device
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sensitivity
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Number of spontaneous hypoglycaemic episodes detected by the hyposafe H02 compared to the total number of validated spontaneous hypoglycaemic episodes.
Validation was performed by self-measured blood glucose (SMBG).
|
3 months
|
|
Positive Predictive Value
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Number of validated spontaneous hypoglycaemic episodes detected by the hyposafe H02 compared to the total number of notification from the hyposafe H02.
Validation was performed by self-measured blood glucose (SMBG).
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Sensitivity
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes detected by the hyposafe H02 compared to the total number of validated hypoglycaemic episodes.
Validation was performed by self-measured blood glucose (SMBG) or plasma glucose (PG).
|
3 months
|
|
Overall Positive Predictive Value
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Total number of validated hypoglycaemic episodes detected by the hyposafe H02 compared to the total number of alerts from the hyposafe H02.
Validation was performed by self-measured blood glucose (SMBG) or plasma glucose (PG).
|
3 months
|
|
Sensitivity During Insulin-induced Hypoglycaemia
Time Frame: 2 days
|
Number of insulin-induced hypoglycaemic episodes detected by the hyposafe H02 compared to the total number of insulin-induced hypoglycaemic episodes.
|
2 days
|
|
Positive Predictive Value for Insulin-induced Hypoglycaemia
Time Frame: 2 days
|
Number of insulin-induced hypoglycaemic episodes detected by the hyposafe H02 compared to the total number of alerts from the hyposafe H02
|
2 days
|
|
Number of Participants With a Satisfactory EEG Quality Test
Time Frame: start up and after 3 months
|
The EEG quality test was performed twice in the study.
At start up and at the end of the study.
Evaluation was based on visual review of EEG of known phenomena and artefacts by an experienced EEG reviewer.
|
start up and after 3 months
|
|
Change in Impedance (kOhm) Over Time
Time Frame: start up and after 3 months
|
The EEG performance was measured as the impedance as a function of time.
An impedance value below 5 kOhm is considered very good.
Number of participants with impedance values below 5 kOhm and no change over time is reported.
|
start up and after 3 months
|
|
Device Deficiencies
Time Frame: 4 months
|
Total number of device deficiencies
|
4 months
|
|
Mean Glucose Level at the Time of a Hypoglycaemia Notification
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Glucose levels were measured at the time of a hypoglycaemia notification during an outpatients settings (the spontaneous episodes) and during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (the insulin-induced episodes)
|
3 months
|
|
Development in Discomfort Over Time Based on Questionnaires
Time Frame: 3 weeks, 7 weeks and 15 weeks after implantation (baseline)
|
Implant discomfort over time were evaluated at 3 time points; on average 3 weeks, 7 weeks and 15 weeks after implantation (baseline).
Here the categories were converted into cardinal numbers: ranging from strongly agree=5 to strongly disagree=1 on the statement ''The implant has not caused discomfort in the past two days'.
|
3 weeks, 7 weeks and 15 weeks after implantation (baseline)
|
|
User Satisfaction Based on Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 month
|
User satisfaction were evaluated as to whether the subjects wished to continue to use the device
|
1 month
|
|
Mean Number of Hours of Use Per Device
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Mean number of hours of use per device is measured as recording time of device
|
3 months
|
|
Response to Hypoglycaemia Notification
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Response to hypoglyceamia notifications measured as the participants were able to take preventive actions upon notification of hypoglycaemia in an outpatient settings (the spontaneous hypoglycemic episodes) and during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia
|
3 months
|
|
Alarm Fatigue Based on Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The participants were given a questionnaire regarding their preferences for sensitivity and false alarms at the end of the study.
Reporting are for preferences during the day.
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard, MD, PhD, Nordsjaellands Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pilot 2 Diabetes
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.