Comparison of Software-assisted Implantation of Elastic Spine Pad (TM) With Respect to Postoperative Change in Neck Disability Index (NDI) With the Conventional Disc Prosthesis Rotaio (TM) After Anterior Cervical Discectomy for Cervical Disc Prolapse

October 14, 2016 updated by: Technische Universität Dresden
This is an investigator-initiated study. The primary goal is to evaluate the efficacy of two different cervical disc prosthetic devices with respect to postoperative change in neck disability index. The evaluation will include clinical and radiological parameters.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dresden, Germany, 01307
        • Recruiting
        • Uniklinikum Dresden

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indication for monosegmental anterior cervical discectomy with implantation of a disc prosthesis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Radiologic signs of extensive bone degeneration in the affected segment
  • Necessity of implantation of a device smaller in height than 5 mm (as predicted with teh use of the Vertaplan (TM) software
  • Transversal spine cord lesion
  • Cervical myelopathy
  • Preceding surgery on the cervical spine
  • Traumatic lesions of the cervical spine
  • Radiographic instability in the affected segment: flexion / extension: shift sagittal plane> 3.5 mm or 20% and rotation in the sagittal plane > 20 °, OR in static X-ray examinations: shift in the sagittal plane 3.5 mm or 20% of the vertebral body width and relative sagittal plane angulation > 11º
  • signs of instability (Olisthesis) in another segment of the cervical spine
  • Active systemic infection
  • diseases of the rheumatic type and all autoimmune diseases
  • bone metabolic diseases (for example, Paget's disease)
  • skeletal metastases
  • infections in the cervical spine
  • Neurological seizure disorders or other serious neurological disease with risk of falls
  • Severe heart failure (NYHA III-IV)
  • Bleeding disorders or clopidogrel / coumarins - treatment
  • Systemic use of corticosteroids for more than a month in the last 12 months
  • Pregnancy
  • Legally incompetent patient
  • Lactation
  • Deformity, anomalies, not fully developed skeleton
  • Local tumor disease
  • Pre-existing neurologic abnormalities or other shortcomings, such as a Parkinson's disease, diabetic neuropathy, multiple sclerosis, peripheral neuropathy
  • Drug / drug or alcohol dependence

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Elastic spine pad
Patients, who receive Elastic Spine Pad (TM) as cervical disc prosthesis after ventral discectomy.
Anterior cervical discectomy, with the use of the ESP prosthesis (Manufacturer: FH orthopedics, Mulhouse, France) for the disc replacement.
Active Comparator: Rotaio
Patients, who receive Rotaio (TM) as cervical disc prosthesis after ventral discectomy.
Anterior cervical discectomy, with the use of the Rotaio prosthesis (Manufacturer: Signus Med, Alzenau, Germany) for the disc replacement.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in Neck disability index compared to baseline
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative
6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in visual analogue scale for pain in the neck and peripheral pain compared to baseline
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative
6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative
Change in EuroQOL (EQ-5D) compared to baseline
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative
6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative
Change in Core Outcome Measure Index (COMI) compared to baseline
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative
6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative
Change in flexion and extension radiographs compared to baseline
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperative
6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperative
Change in and computer aided measurement of segmental height degeneration in adjacent segments compared to baseline
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperative
6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperative
Change in consumption of analgetics compared to baseline
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative
The change in analgetics consumption will be assessed on a scale of increase - stable - reduction.
6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative
Return to work
Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperative
6 weeks postoperative
Return to work
Time Frame: 3 months postoperative
3 months postoperative
Return to work
Time Frame: 6 months postoperative
6 months postoperative
Return to work
Time Frame: 12 months postoperative
12 months postoperative
Return to work
Time Frame: 24 months postoperative
24 months postoperative
Mortality
Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperative
6 weeks postoperative
Mortality
Time Frame: 3 months postoperative
3 months postoperative
Mortality
Time Frame: 6 months postoperative
6 months postoperative
Mortality
Time Frame: 12 months postoperative
12 months postoperative
Mortality
Time Frame: 24 months postoperative
24 months postoperative
Adverse effects
Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperative
6 weeks postoperative
Adverse effects
Time Frame: 3 months postoperative
3 months postoperative
Adverse effects
Time Frame: 6 months postoperative
6 months postoperative
Adverse effects
Time Frame: 12 months postoperative
12 months postoperative
Adverse effects
Time Frame: 24 months postoperative
24 months postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intervertebral Disc Displacement

Clinical Trials on Anterior cervical discectomy with prosthetic disc replacement / ESP.

3
Subscribe