A Trial to Assess the Pain-control Efficacy of Intra-articular Toradol Compared to Oral NSAIDs

November 17, 2020 updated by: Kimberly A Chambers, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Pain-control Efficacy of Intra-articular Toradol Compared to Oral NSAIDs: A Pilot Study

The study objective is to determine whether a single intra-articular dose of an anti-inflammatory (Toradol) will reduce the need for other analgesic medications and, if so, how long the benefits will last.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis (OA) who present to the ED with a chief complaint of knee pain that the treating provider attributes to their arthritis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute knee trauma
  • Intra-articular steroid injection within 6 months
  • History of gout or rheumatoid arthritis
  • X ray evidence of pathologic fracture, malignancy, or other non-OA cause of symptoms
  • Signs or symptoms or high risk of acute infection: Recent fevers and chills; Erythema, warmth, or pain out of proportion to exam; History of hemodialysis; History of IV drug use
  • Lidocaine allergy
  • Any contraindication to NSAID therapy, including: Allergy; Pregnancy; History of renal insufficiency; History of gastritis, GERD or GI bleeding; Primary care physician's restriction of its use
  • Contraindication to the procedure, including: Hemophilia; History of total knee replacement of the affected joint
  • An inability to give informed consent; Active psychosis; Diminished capacity requiring another person to provide consent for medical treatment
  • An inability to be contacted for follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Toradol injection
3-ml solution that contains 2 ml of normal saline and 1 ml of Toradol, 30 mg, will be infused into the affected joint.
3-ml solution that contains 2 ml of normal saline and 1 ml of Toradol, 30 mg, will be infused into the affected joint.
Other Names:
  • ketorolac
Active Comparator: Oral NSAID
800mg Motrin will be administered. (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID))
800mg Motrin will be administered. (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID))
Other Names:
  • ibuprofen

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain Medication Usage for Breakthrough Pain
Time Frame: 72 hours
72 hours
Pain Level as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 72 hours
72 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Medication Usage for Breakthrough Pain
Time Frame: 1 week post treatment
The number of pills will be reported
1 week post treatment
Pain Medication Usage for Breakthrough Pain
Time Frame: 2 weeks post treatment
The number of pills will be reported
2 weeks post treatment
Pain Medication Usage for Breakthrough Pain
Time Frame: 3 weeks post treatment
The number of pills will be reported
3 weeks post treatment
Pain Medication Usage for Breakthrough Pain
Time Frame: 4 weeks post treatment
The number of pills will be reported
4 weeks post treatment
Pain Level as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 1 week post treatment
1 week post treatment
Pain Level as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 2 weeks post treatment
2 weeks post treatment
Pain Level as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 3 weeks post treatment
3 weeks post treatment
Pain Level as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks post treatment
4 weeks post treatment
Number of Participants who had a second visit to a Emergency Department or Clinic
Time Frame: 4 weeks
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kimberly A Chambers, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 17, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthritic Knee Pain

Clinical Trials on Toradol

3
Subscribe