Cognitive Style and Mobile Technology in E-learning in Undergraduate Medical Education

January 27, 2021 updated by: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Cognitive Style and Mobile Technology in E-learning in Undergraduate Medical Education- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Otolaryngology-head and Neck Surgery

New designs of 6-year undergraduate medical education (UME) in Taiwan mainly include (1) integral curricula of body organ system, (2) multiple methods of clinical teaching and assessment, and (3) generalism in UME. Accompany with decreasing educational hours in the classrooms and hospital, essential but minor components of primary healthcare such as ophthalmology and otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (ORL-HNS) is disproportionately under-represented in UME. Novel medical education stresses on enabling self-directory learning and increasing learning hours outside the classrooms. Accordingly, we hypothesize that innovations in educational technology can enhance the learning outcomes of ORL-HNS. This study is aimed to determine whether mobile technology in e-learning (M-TEL) is an effective tool for the instruction of ORL-HNS and to compare effects of different cognitive styles on learning outcomes of M-TEL with various modules of medical education. This is a randomized controlled trial. We will recruit 60 UME students without previous training in ORL-HNS to undergo the Group Embedded Figures Test to determine their cognitive styles such as field dependence or field-independence. After blinded randomization, students are instructed on two modules of emergent ORL-HNS disorders, using either a standard e-learning of text-figure Power Point show or an interactive multimedia module. Subjects are evaluated on emergent ORL-HNS disorders using text-based assessment and multimedia assessment take place prior to and following instruction. After 7 days later, they will be assessed using global satisfaction score and AttrakDiff2 questionnaire. We anticipate that this study can confirm M-TEL can enhance the efficiency of the instruction of ORL-HNS and understand differences in learning outcomes of M-TEL with various modules of medical education between field dependence and filed independence using this platform.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background:

New designs of 6-year undergraduate medical education (UME) mainly include (1) integral curricula of body organ system, (2) multiple methods of clinical teaching and assessment, and (3) generalism in UME. UME is meant to enable graduates to become undifferentiated general physicians. Accompany with decreasing educational hours in the classrooms and hospital, essential but minor components of primary healthcare such as ophthalmology and otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (ORL-HNS) is disproportionately under-represented in UME. In Canada, substantial downstream effects on managing ORL-HNS problems have been noted in family medicine residents. In order to improve learning insufficiency and enhance clinical competency without increasing extra-hours in the classrooms and hospitals, novel medical education stresses on enabling self-directory learning and increasing learning hours outside the classrooms. Accordingly, we hypothesize that innovations in educational technology can enhance the learning outcomes of ORL-HNS.

Purposes: This study is aimed to determine whether mobile technology in e-learning (M-TEL) is an effective tool for the instruction of ORL-HNS and to compare effects of different cognitive styles on learning outcomes of M-TEL with various modules of medical education.

Material and Methods:

This is a randomized controlled trial. Firstly, we have been setup a e-learning platform of the Top 10 emergent ORL-HNS disorders with translating into an application (APP) function that can execute in mobile devices. Secondly, we will recruit 60 UME students without previous training in ORL-HNS to undergo the Group Embedded Figures Test to determine their cognitive styles such as field dependence or field-independence. After blinded randomization, students are instructed on two modules of emergent ORL-HNS disorders, using either a standard e-learning of text-figure Power Point show or an interactive multimedia module. Subjects are evaluated on emergent ORL-HNS disorders using a text-based assessment and a multimedia assessment take place prior to and following instruction.

Anticipating Outcome:

This study can (1) establish a M-TEL of ORL-HNS that can deliver an innovatively mobile e-learning to supplement the deficiency of the classroom hours, (2) confirm M-TEL can enhance the efficiency of the instruction of ORL-HNS, and (3) understand differences in learning outcomes of M-TEL with various modules of medical education between field dependence and filed independence using this platform.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age > 20 years old;
  2. UME students (defined as the three or four years of medical school training).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous ORL-HNS training;
  2. Declining to participate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: interactive multimedia module
Subjects allocated to this experimental group will receive an intervention of mobile technology of e-learning (M-TEL) using the interactive multimedia (IM) module consist of integrated text, images, and small game tests (intervention) for 100 minutes. The module is a non-linearity of learning with interaction (student-based choice and pop-up feedback). This context has been adjusted to the same level to that of the PPS module.
UME students learn the Top 10 emergent ORL-HNS disorders using the M-TEL including the IM module or the PPS module.
Active Comparator: Power Point show module
Subjects allocated to this experimental group will receive an intervention of mobile technology of e-learning (M-TEL) using the Power Point show (PPS) module consist of integrated text, images, and audio (intervention) for 100 minutes. The module is a linear learning without interaction. This context has been adjusted to the same level to that of the IM module.
UME students learn the Top 10 emergent ORL-HNS disorders using the M-TEL including the IM module or the PPS module.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage Change in Multiple-choice Question (MCQ) Scores
Time Frame: before and immediately after the M-TEL intervention
Subjects will undergo the duplicated 15-minute MCQ tests before after the M-TEL Subjects will undergo the duplicated 15-minute MCQ tests 15 minutes before the M-TEL intervention with either the IM module or the PPS module and immediately after the M-TEL intervention.
before and immediately after the M-TEL intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage Change in Multimedia Situation Test (MST) Scores
Time Frame: before and immediately after the M-TEL intervention
Subjects will undergo the duplicated 15-minute MST tests 15 minutes before the M-TEL intervention with either the IM module or the PPS module and immediately after the M-TEL intervention.
before and immediately after the M-TEL intervention
Global Satisfaction Score
Time Frame: 7 days after the M-TEL intervention
Global satisfaction score is measured using a visual analogue scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied) after 7 days post M-TEL.
7 days after the M-TEL intervention
AttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Pragmatic Quality Score
Time Frame: 7 days after the M-TEL intervention
For more delicately evaluate the acceptance of technical innovations, we will assess "user experience" using the AttrakDiff2. AttrakDiff2 is developed as a tool by Hassenzahl's research group to be able to quantify attractive, identifiable, stimulating, and pragmatic qualities. The tool consists of 28 seven-step items whose poles are opposite adjectives (e.g. "confusing - clear", "unusual - ordinary", "good - bad"). Each set of adjective items is ordered into a scale of intensity. Each of the mean values of an item group creates a scale value for pragmatic quality (PQ), hedonic stimulation (HQ-S), hedonic identification (HQ-I), and attractiveness (ATT) (range: -3-3).
7 days after the M-TEL intervention
AttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Hedonic Stimulation
Time Frame: 7 days after the M-TEL intervention
For more delicately evaluate the acceptance of technical innovations, we will assess "user experience" using the AttrakDiff2. AttrakDiff2 is developed as a tool by Hassenzahl's research group to be able to quantify attractive, identifiable, stimulating, and pragmatic qualities. The tool consists of 28 seven-step items whose poles are opposite adjectives (e.g. "confusing - clear", "unusual - ordinary", "good - bad"). Each set of adjective items is ordered into a scale of intensity. Each of the mean values of an item group creates a scale value for pragmatic quality (PQ), hedonic stimulation (HQ-S), hedonic identification (HQ-I), and attractiveness (ATT) (range: -3-3).
7 days after the M-TEL intervention
AttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Hedonic Identification
Time Frame: 7 days after the M-TEL intervention
For more delicately evaluate the acceptance of technical innovations, we will assess "user experience" using the AttrakDiff2. AttrakDiff2 is developed as a tool by Hassenzahl's research group to be able to quantify attractive, identifiable, stimulating, and pragmatic qualities. The tool consists of 28 seven-step items whose poles are opposite adjectives (e.g. "confusing - clear", "unusual - ordinary", "good - bad"). Each set of adjective items is ordered into a scale of intensity. Each of the mean values of an item group creates a scale value for pragmatic quality (PQ), hedonic stimulation (HQ-S), hedonic identification (HQ-I), and attractiveness (ATT) (range: -3-3).
7 days after the M-TEL intervention
AttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Attractiveness
Time Frame: 7 days after the M-TEL intervention
For more delicately evaluate the acceptance of technical innovations, we will assess "user experience" using the AttrakDiff2. AttrakDiff2 is developed as a tool by Hassenzahl's research group to be able to quantify attractive, identifiable, stimulating, and pragmatic qualities. The tool consists of 28 seven-step items whose poles are opposite adjectives (e.g. "confusing - clear", "unusual - ordinary", "good - bad"). Each set of adjective items is ordered into a scale of intensity. Each of the mean values of an item group creates a scale value for pragmatic quality (PQ), hedonic stimulation (HQ-S), hedonic identification (HQ-I), and attractiveness (ATT) (range: -3-3).
7 days after the M-TEL intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Li-Ang Lee, M.D., Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 23, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 5, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 23, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The individua participant data of UME students may be not suitable to be available to other researchers

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Medical Education

Clinical Trials on mobile technology of e-learning (M-TEL)

Subscribe