- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01286025
Comparing the Effect of Video-cases and Text-cases on Medical Students' Learning in Tutorial
January 27, 2011 updated by: Harvard University Faculty of Medicine
A Randomized Crossover Study to Compare the Critical Thinking of Medical Students When Using Video-based or Written Cases
This study is designed to examine how the type of learning case affects the thinking of medical students in tutorial
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Tutorials at Harvard Medical School use problem-based learning with written cases.
Students work in groups under the supervision of a tutor who guides their exploration of the material.
As students progress through the curriculum there is an opportunity to advance the complexity of the material they are presented with.
Video-based patient case studies have been shown to improve critical thinking ratios in paediatric medical student problem-based learning exercises, and time spent on data exploration, theory building and theory evaluation in postgraduate residency programs.
We hypothesize that video provides a stimulus that improves cognitive processing and critical thinking among medical students, as compared to working from the text-based transcript of the same case.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
28
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
- Harvard Medical School
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- medical student participating in the endocrine and reproductive pathophysiology course at Harvard Medical School
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Video modality
|
Patients whose case histories are pathophysiologically illustrative will be recruited, and interviewed on video.
Their stories will be edited and divided into sections, and combined with the patient's laboratory, imaging, and pathological reports when appropriate
|
Active Comparator: Text modality
|
Patients whose case histories are pathophysiologically illustrative will be recruited, and interviewed on video.
Their stories will be edited and divided into sections, and combined with the patient's laboratory, imaging, and pathological reports when appropriate.
The transcript of these video-recordings will form the basis of the text-based case presentation modality.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Overall ratio of deep to superficial thinking
Time Frame: Four 90-minute tutorial sessions
|
Depth of thinking will be evaluated using the method of Kamin et al.
Transcription of each tutorial will be divided into utterances.
Each utterance will be coded for depth of thinking (deep vs. superficial).
The ratio of deep to superficial thinking by case modality will be reported.
|
Four 90-minute tutorial sessions
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Distribution of learning activities
Time Frame: Four 90-min tutorial sessions
|
Transcription of each tutorial will be divided into utterances.
Each utterance will be coded by learning domain (identification, description, exploration, integration, and application.
The distribution of domains by case modality will be reported.
|
Four 90-min tutorial sessions
|
Preferences of students for each case modality
Time Frame: 5 weeks
|
Students will be surveyed regarding their preferences for video- vs. text-based case presentation modality using a Likert-scale
|
5 weeks
|
Preferences of tutors for each case modality
Time Frame: 5 weeks
|
Tutors will be surveyed regarding their preferences for video- vs. text-based case presentation modality using a Likert-scale
|
5 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Graham T McMahon, MD MMSc, Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
February 1, 2008
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2009
Study Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2009
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2011
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 27, 2011
First Posted (Estimate)
January 31, 2011
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
January 31, 2011
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 27, 2011
Last Verified
January 1, 2011
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- M15700-101
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Problem-based Learning
-
Maastricht UniversityCompletedProblem-Based LearningNetherlands
-
Sulaiman AlRajhi CollegesCompletedCost | Problem-based Learning | Peer GroupSaudi Arabia
-
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and SimulationUnknownSurgical Procedure, Unspecified | Simulation Training | Education, Medical | Learning | Humans | Problem-Based Learning | Clinical CompetenceDenmark
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityRecruiting
-
Maharishi Markendeswar University (Deemed to be...Completed
-
Mbarara University of Science and TechnologyUniversity of Calgary; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute; The ELMA... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSimulation-based LearningUganda
-
Dar Al Uloom UniversityCompletedMedical Education | Simulation Based LearningSaudi Arabia
-
Cairo UniversityRecruiting
-
Pei-Hung LiaoActive, not recruitingLearning ProblemTaiwan
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedLearning ProblemTurkey
Clinical Trials on video case modality
-
University of MonastirCompleted
-
Piquilloud Imboden LiseRecruitingMechanical Ventilation ComplicationSwitzerland
-
Oklahoma State UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Recruiting
-
Oklahoma State UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Withdrawn
-
Baylor College of MedicineCompleted
-
Oklahoma State UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Recruiting
-
Healthy Relationships CaliforniaRecruitingProgram ModalityUnited States
-
Region SkaneCancer Registry of Norway; UnilabsActive, not recruiting
-
Healthy Relationships CaliforniaRecruitingProgram ModalityUnited States
-
University of Massachusetts, WorcesterCompleted