Cataract Refractive Suite Study

August 28, 2018 updated by: Alcon, a Novartis Company

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Evaluation of Refractive Predictability in Patients With or Without Corneal Astigmatism (Maximum Allowable up to 1.25D) When Using the Cataract Refractive Suite and Standard Manual Techniques

The purpose of this study is to compare the refractive predictability (prediction error) between the Cataract Refractive Suite (CRS) and standard manual technique at one month post-operative

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Panama City, Florida, United States, 32405
        • Alcon Investigative Site
    • Minnesota
      • Stillwater, Minnesota, United States, 55082
        • Alcon Investigative Site
    • Texas
      • Hurst, Texas, United States, 76054
        • Alcon Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with bilateral cataracts;
  • Planned cataract surgery and implantation of ReSTOR +2.5 D multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) in both eyes;
  • Clear intraocular media, other than cataract, in study eye(s);
  • Willing and able to complete all required postoperative visits;
  • Able to comprehend and sign a statement of informed consent;
  • Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant irregular corneal astigmatism;
  • History of or current severe dry eyes, retinal/uveal pathology or concurrent ocular disease;
  • Previous intraocular or corneal refractive surgery, corneal transplant, or retinal detachment;
  • Any inflammation or edema (swelling) of the cornea;
  • Pregnant;
  • Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: CRS
First surgical eye randomized to Cataract Refractive Suite with second surgical eye (fellow eye) assigned to standard manual technique. Second eye surgery conducted within 7-14 days of the first eye surgery.
Configuration consisting of Verion™ Image Guided System, LenSx® Laser and ORA™ System with VerifEye+™ (with or without VerifEye Lynk), combined for use in surgical pre-op planning and during cataract surgery
Standard biometry for intra-ocular lens (IOL) calculation and cataract removal using phacoemulsification technique
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Manual
First surgical eye randomized to standard manual technique with second surgical eye (fellow eye) assigned to Cataract Refractive Suite. Second eye surgery conducted within 7-14 days of the first eye surgery.
Configuration consisting of Verion™ Image Guided System, LenSx® Laser and ORA™ System with VerifEye+™ (with or without VerifEye Lynk), combined for use in surgical pre-op planning and during cataract surgery
Standard biometry for intra-ocular lens (IOL) calculation and cataract removal using phacoemulsification technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Within 0.5 Diopter (D) of Predicted Postoperative Spherical Equivalent at Month 1
Time Frame: Day 20-40 from second implantation
Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was calculated as follows: sphere + 1/2 cylinder. The sphere and cylinder values were from the manifest refraction assessment. Manifest refraction was assessed at 4 meters under photopic lighting conditions using a phoropter. Due to early termination of the study and limited sample size, a statistical inference test was not carried out as planned.
Day 20-40 from second implantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative Dissipated Energy (CDE)
Time Frame: Day 0 (operative day), each eye
Cumulative Dissipated Energy (CDE) represents the energy dissipated of the ultrasound tip and infusion sleeve at the incision point during the removal of cataractous lens. CDE was reported on the Vision System interface and measured in percent-seconds. A lower CDE indicates that less energy was expended in the eye. Due to early termination of the study and limited sample size, a statistical inference test was not carried out as planned.
Day 0 (operative day), each eye
Estimated Aspiration Fluid Used During Surgery
Time Frame: Day 0 (operative day), each eye
Aspiration fluid (amount of fluid used during the removal of the cataractous lens) was measured in milliliters (ml). A lower value indicates less fluid used during the procedure. Due to early termination of the study and limited sample size, a statistical inference test was not carried out as planned.
Day 0 (operative day), each eye
Phaco Aspiration Time Spent During Surgery
Time Frame: Day 0 (operative day), each eye
Phaco aspiration time (the average time the surgeon took to complete the phacoemulsification) was measured in seconds. A lower value indicates that the surgeon spent less time aspirating fluid and material from the eye during surgery. Due to early termination of the study and limited sample size, a statistical inference test was not carried out as planned.
Day 0 (operative day), each eye

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sr. Clinical Manager, GCRA, Alcon, A Novartis Division

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 2, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 25, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 25, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CTK246-P001

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataracts

Clinical Trials on Cataract Refractive Suite (CRS)

3
Subscribe