Conventional Surgery vs. Verion/VerifEye

August 21, 2019 updated by: Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC

Refractive Outcomes Evaluation of the Verion Image Guided System + ORA System With VerifEye

Nowadays cataract patient's expectations are closer to those of refractive surgery patients. Patients want to be spectacle independent. However, fifteen to twenty percent of cataract surgery patients have from 1.00 to 3.00 diopters (D) of corneal astigmatism which makes achieving spectacle independence unlikely in this patients unless the astigmatism is treated at the time of cataract surgery. Option to treat this astigmatism include corneal or limbal incisions (LRIs), the use of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) or LASIK. Regardless of the treatment of choice to correct the astigmatism at time of cataract extraction, a treatment plan has to be calculated preoperatively. This planning include: keratometry measurements and the use of a calculator to estimate the treatment and orientation of IOL and/or placement of the LRIs.

New technology has been developed and is widely used. Among this technology, we have the VERION Image Guided System. This system encompasses a reference unit that takes a picture of the eye with the patient in the sitting position creating image of the patient's eye, capturing scleral vessels, limbus and iris features. It measures keratometry as well as the corneal diameter (limbus) and pupil size. The information captured is transferred automatically to its planner where IOL power calculation and astigmatism correction calculation are completed. Additionally, intraoperative wavefront aberrometry has been used in the last couple of years with increase success.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Nowadays cataract patient's expectations are closer to those of refractive surgery patients. Patients want to be spectacle independent. However, fifteen to twenty percent of cataract surgery patients have from 1.00 to 3.00 diopters (D) of corneal astigmatism which makes achieving spectacle independence unlikely in this patients unless the astigmatism is treated at the time of cataract surgery.

Currently available treatments include corneal or limbal incisions, the use of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) or LASIK. Limbal relaxing incisions (LRIs) are the most commonly used manual method Traditionally, LRIs have been made manually (with a surgical knife). With the introduction of femtosecond laser to assist during cataract surgery, a new alternative is available for creating corneal incisions. The stability of the LRIs and visual outcomes using toric IOLs have been shown.

Regardless of the treatment of choice to correct the astigmatism at time of cataract extraction, a treatment plan has to be calculated preoperatively. This planning include: keratometry measurements and the use of a calculator to estimate the treatment and orientation of IOL and placement of the LRIs.

Keratometry can be measured using a variety of devices including manual keratometers (i.e. Javal-Shiotz), automated keratometers, corneal topography, and optical biometry ( IOL master and Lenstar).

Once keratometry to be used has been selected, if the treatment of choice are LRIs, a calculator is used to determine the location and size of the LRI. Many nomograms have been developed; the choice of nomogram is the surgeon's prefer one, usually based on prior experience, and their preferred knife. LRIs calculators are available on line. Nomograms specify the location, length, size, and number of incisions based on the patient's age, the type of astigmatism, and the amount of astigmatism correction needed.

If a toric IOL has been chosen then planning the appropriate orientation of the toric IOL is accomplished by using online calculators. The calculator selects the optimal toric power and location based on the keratometry and the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) values entered by the surgeon.

Intraoperatively, marking the eye and placing the incisions or aligning the toric IOL in the right axis are key steps for the success of astigmatism correction. Marking of the eye can be done using a variety of instruments using ink and it is routinely done with the patient in the upright position to avoid cyclorotation. Once patient is on the table in supine position, axis should be checked once again. Additional suggested methods to mark the eye include taking pictures preoperatively to identify anatomical landmarks similar to iris registration in refractive surgery. The use of iris registration during LASIK was introduced in 2008. Several publications have shown that patients undergoing wavefront-guided LASIK with iris recognition achieved better visual and refractive outcomes compared to conventional LASIK.

Recently, Alcon introduced VERION Image Guided System: Digital Surgical Planning and Positioning Tools. This system encompasses a reference unit that takes a picture of the eye with the patient in the sitting position creating a high-resolution digital image of the patient's eye, capturing scleral vessels, limbus and iris features. It measures keratometry as well as the corneal diameter (limbus) and pupil size. The information captured is then transferred automatically to the planner where additional information including target refraction, manifest refraction, axial length, anterior chamber depth, and lens thickness is entered for IOL power calculation and astigmatism correction planning. Astigmatism correction options include corneal incisions, toric IOL and a combination of both. Intraoperatively, The VERION Digital Marker displays patient information and images from the VERION Reference Unit. Additionally it positions all incision locations and assists with lens alignment in real time while accounting for the variable impact of cyclorotation and patient eye movement. In the OR, it displays a reticle that helps to align the IOL to the axis according the surgical plan. It also helps to position manual LRIs.

Intraoperative wavefront aberrometry has been used in the last couple of years to confirm spherical and toric power as well as lens position. The Optiwave Refractive Analysis (ORA) system can refract the eye in phakic, aphakic, and pseudophakic states at any time during cataract surgery and assists in IOL power selection and recommendations for toric IOL positioning before and after implantation as well as LRIs confirming the surgery plan calculated preoperatively. Furthermore, VerifEye, an ORA hardware upgrade, provides continuous assessment of the patient's eye allowing for more precise measurements; therefore, more accurate results and improved refractive outcomes and VerifEye +, the latest upgrade that provides streaming information on the refractive status and correct IOL positioning through the right ocular of the surgical microscope. This enables the surgeon to visualize all the information without having to look up at the monitor screen during the surgical procedure.

This new technology is an alternative to plan and treat astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery. It could make this treatment easier for less experience surgeons by facilitating the calculations and making the identification of the correct axis easier by reducing the need for manual marks.

The main objective of this study is to evaluate spherical and astigmatism outcomes post routine cataract surgery when the complete VERION Image Guided System packet + ORA System with VerifEye or VerifEye + are used in the treatment of pre-existing astigmatism using toric intraocular lens (IOL) or corneal incisions compared to the surgeon's standard of care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • South Carolina
      • Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States, 29464
        • Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is undergoing bilateral cataract extraction or refractive lens exchange with intraocular lens implantation and astigmatism correction.
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent for participation in the study
  • Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits and other study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe preoperative ocular pathology: amblyopia, rubella cataract, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, shallow anterior chamber, macular edema, retinal detachment, aniridia or iris atrophy, uveitis, history of iritis, iris neovascularization, medically uncontrolled glaucoma, microphthalmos or macrophthalmos, optic nerve atrophy, macular degeneration (with anticipated best postoperative visual acuity less than 20/30), advanced glaucomatous damage, etc.
  • Uncontrolled diabetes.
  • Use of any systemic or topical drug known to interfere with visual performance.
  • Contact lens use during the active treatment portion of the trial.
  • Any concurrent infectious/non infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis or uveitis.
  • Pseudoexfoliation syndrome or any other condition that has the potential to weaken the zonules
  • Previous refractive surgery.
  • Any clinically significant, serious or severe medical or psychiatric condition that may increase the risk associated with study participation or study device implantation or may interfere with the interpretation of study results.
  • Participation in (or current participation) any investigational drug or device trial within the previous 30 days prior to the start date of this trial.
  • Intraocular conventional surgery within the past three months or intraocular laser surgery within one month in the operated eye.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Conventional
Surgeon's standard of care prior to getting VERION. Spherical power will be selected using the surgeon's preferred formula (Haigis, Holladay 2, Holladay, or other) and biometry method (IOL Master, Lenstar). Astigmatism correction will be planned using the surgeon's preferred keratometry method and calculator/nomogram to determine toric power and corneal incisions (i.e. Alcon toric calculator, Holladay toric calculator, Abbott Medical Optics (AMO) LRI calculator, etc). At time of surgery, axis of placement will be marked using blue ink marks. Corneal incisions will be made manually.
Routine cataract surgery by phacoemulsification before laser-assisted cataract surgery.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Refractive Cataract Suite (Verion + ORA)
Digital Surgical Planning and Positioning Tools + ORA System with VerifEye or VerifEye +. Spherical power of the IOL will be selected using the Verion Planner with the surgeon's preferred formula with an optimized A-constant (Haigis, Holladay 2, Holladay, or other). Both toric lenses and corneal incisions will be calculated with the Verion Planner using the Verion Reference Unit keratometry and white to white measurements, and Lenstar biometry. The VERION Digital Markers L and M will be used for axis of placement and confirmed using ORA System with VerifEye or VerifEye +.
Laser-assisted cataract surgery with the digital surgical planning and positioning tools, and intraoperative aberrometry.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Residual Refractive Cylinder
Time Frame: Three months
This is the manifest refractive cylinder measured 3 months after surgery. Note that because cataract surgery has been performed, there is no associated baseline value.
Three months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Residual Mean Spherical Equivalent Refraction
Time Frame: Three months
This is the mean of the spherical equivalent refraction (sphere + 0.5*cylinder) from each eye. Note that because cataract surgery has been performed, there is no associated baseline value.
Three months
Residual Corneal Astigmatism
Time Frame: Three months
This is the anterior corneal astigmatism measured through keratometry. Note that because cataract surgery has been performed, there is no associated baseline value.
Three months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 5, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 5, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CEP 2014-003

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

Clinical Trials on Conventional

Subscribe