An Open-label Clinical Trial to Compare the Safety and Effectiveness of Adaptive Versus Conventional Deep Brain Stimulation (ADVENT)

March 2, 2022 updated by: Newronika

A Prospective, Multi-center, Open-label, Pivotal Clinical Trial to Compare the Safety and Effectiveness of Adaptive Versus Conventional Stimulation in Advanced Levodopa-Responsive Parkinson's Disease Treated With Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation

The clinical trial aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) and Globus Pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) with the AlphaDBS IPG System when programmed in adaptive versus conventional stimulating modes. It includes an initial open-label, crossover phase and a long term follow-up phase, during which the patient is free to switch between stimulating modes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is an international multi-center (North America and Europe) clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of bilateral STN and GPi DBS with the AlphaDBS IPG System when programmed in adaptive (aDBS) versus conventional (cDBS) stimulating modes, in patients with advanced levodopa-responsive Parkinson's disease (PD).

The protocol is comprised of:

Phase 1: Initial Treatment Period: Cross-Over Design

  • Phase 1a: All patients will start the study in cDBS mode. After a 1-month post-surgical stabilization, the AlphaDBS IPG System will be turned ON in cDBS mode. Participants will complete a 1-month period of programming optimization (to fine tune medical therapies and stimulation parameters) followed by a 3-month period of cDBS.
  • Phase 1b: At the end of the 3-month follow up in cDBS, participants will be switched to the aDBS mode. Participants will then complete a 1-month period of optimization (to fine tune medical therapies and stimulation parameters) followed by a 3-month period of aDBS.

Phase 2: Long-term follow-up: Naturalistic Follow-up Design Patients completing Phase 1 are eligible to enter long-term follow-up for up to an additional 28 months. During this time, patients are free to change the DBS mode as preferred (with a maximum switches set by the physician). Visits at 6-month follow-ups will collect safety and efficacy data.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 95 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is ≥55 years old
  2. Patient has been diagnosed with levodopa-responsive idiopathic Parkinson's disease for ≥5 years
  3. The disease stage is II, III or IV according to the Hoehn and Yahr scale
  4. Patient has history of improvement of Parkinson's symptoms as a direct result of administering levodopa
  5. PD-related symptoms are not adequately controlled with medication, including motor complications of recent onset (>4 months duration)
  6. Patient experiences persistent disabling PD-related symptoms or drug side effects (e.g., dyskinesia, motor fluctuations, or disabling "off periods") despite optimal medical therapy
  7. Patient has been selected for bilateral STN or Gpi DBS, independently from this study, in accordance with local standard of care DBS screening
  8. Patient has been selected to receive Medtronic leads model 3389 or 37086, independently from this study, in accordance with local standard of care DBS screening
  9. Patient has DBS circuit integrity assessed and confirmed by impedance testing, before IPG implantation
  10. ≥6 hours per day (waking hours) with poor motor symptoms control (time "OFF" plus time "ON" with dyskinesia) despite optimal medical therapy, as assessed by the 3-day diary
  11. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) >26 in MedON condition
  12. Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) score <17 in MedON condition
  13. UPDRS-III improvement by ≥33% following intake of anti-parkinsonian medications
  14. Patient is able to understand the study requirements and the treatment procedures and has provided written informed consent to participate
  15. Patient is willing and capable of completing a 3-day diary and reaches a sufficient level of agreement (> 75%) with study personnel responses
  16. Patient has a responsible caregiver who will help completing the 3-day diary, provide feedback on activities of daily living (ADL), and ensure the patient complies with visit schedule
  17. Patient is willing to maintain a constant anti-PD medication treatment (best medical management) for at least one month prior to study enrollment
  18. Patient is willing and able to attend all study-required visits, complete the study procedures and attend appropriate follow up visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient has contraindications for DBS surgery, including any intracranial abnormality (e.g., generalized atrophy, vascular malformation, hydrocephalus, hematoma, cavernous or venous angioma, tumor or metastases, midline shift, etc.) or metallic implant (e.g., aneurysm clip, cochlear implant, etc.)
  2. Patient has a history of suicide attempt or current active suicidal ideation as determined by a positive response to Item 2-5 of suicide ideation sub-scale of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSR-S)
  3. Patient has dementia, major depression, seizures, congestive heart failure, uncontrolled diabetes, dialysis, substance use disorders as described in DSM-V, or any other severe medical condition
  4. Patient has any medical condition that could interfere with study procedures, confound the assessment of study endpoints, or prevent a proper data collection
  5. Patient had confirmation of diagnosis of a terminal illness associated with survival <12 months
  6. Patient needs repeated MRI scans
  7. Patient requires diathermy, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT)
  8. Patient carries an electrical or electromagnetic implant (e.g., cochlear prosthesis, pacemaker, neurostimulator, etc.)
  9. Patient has, or plans to obtain, an implanted electrical stimulation medical device and/or an implanted medication pump (e.g., DUOPATM infusion pump) and/or is treated with a portable infusion pump
  10. Patient is on anticoagulant therapy which cannot be paused for >5 days before IPG implant surgery
  11. Patient with a history of cranial surgery including ablation procedure or any other previous neurosurgical procedure for the treatment of PD symptoms on either side of the brain
  12. Patient is currently participating in another clinical study (excluding any sub-study of the present study)
  13. Patient is a female who is breastfeeding or of child-bearing potential with a positive urine pregnancy test or not using adequate contraception.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Phase 1a - conventional stimulation
Stimulation will be delivered bilaterally to the STN or the GPi. The stimulation parameters will be based upon standard practice by the neurologist.
The AlphaDBS IPG System delivers both conventional DBS and adaptive DBS. Conventional DBS is programmed by DBS specialists.
Other Names:
  • cDBS
EXPERIMENTAL: Phase 1b - adaptive stimulation
Stimulation will be delivered bilaterally to the STN or the GPi, with the neurologist-set therapeutic window (which corresponds to the upper and lower limits for aDBS amplitude). The stimulation will be automatically adapted according to the personalized algorithm based on real time LFP analysis.
The AlphaDBS IPG System delivers both conventional DBS and adaptive DBS. Adaptive DBS is a programming mode that provides stimulation in a closed-loop adaptive "real-time" fashion, using a biosignal recorded from the same macro-electrodes routinely implanted for DBS as an input variable.
Other Names:
  • aDBS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Time Frame: 9 months
To identify Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (including serious, device-related, stimulation-related, and/or procedure related TEAEs), discontinuations of aDBS and study discontinuation and physical or neurological findings as categorized by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board.
9 months
To compare change in Good on time (GOT) when the patient receives aDBS versus change in GOT when the patient receives cDBS.
Time Frame: 9 months
The expected treatment effectiveness of AlphaDBS IPG System with aDBS mode (∆GOTaDBS = GOTaDBS@3-Months - GOT@Baseline) and with cDBS mode (∆GOTcDBS = GOTcDBS@3-Months - GOT@Baseline) will not differ more than two hours.
9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success rate, number of patients with at least 2 hours improvement in each treatment mode
Time Frame: 9 months
Treatement success is defined as number of patients with >2 hours ∆GOTaDBS and ∆GOTcDBS
9 months
Patient fluctuations
Time Frame: 9 months and 36 months
Number of ON/OFF transitions based on the 3-day diary
9 months and 36 months
UPDRS III
Time Frame: 9 months and 36 months
UPDRS III score, in MedOFF-StimON and MedON-StimON conditions
9 months and 36 months
UdysRS
Time Frame: 9 months and 36 months
Score of the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UdysRS) in MedOFF-StimON and MedON-StimON condition.
9 months and 36 months
Percentage of time in which the system is used in aDBS mode
Time Frame: 28 months
During the long term follow up, when the patient will be able to switch between programming modes, the patient preference will be assessed considering the percentage of time in which the system is used in aDBS.
28 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 30, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on conventional DBS delivered through AlphaDBS IPG System

3
Subscribe