Over 2000 Epidural Anesthesias for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy - a Retrospective Analysis

April 27, 2017 updated by: Karolina Dobrońska, Medical University of Warsaw

Over 2000 Procedures of Epidural Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy - a Retrospective Analysis

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is a renal lithiasis treatment. It is usually two staged: it begins in the lithotomy position for ureteral catheter placement and retrograde pyelography and, subsequently, an optimal renal access is obtained in the prone position. In most of the centers, the PNL is done under general anesthesia (GA) that is associated with a risk of complications due to putting an intubated, muscle-relaxed, unconscious patient in a prone position. In our Department the procedure is usually performed under epidural anesthesia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidural anesthesia performed for PNL over the last decade in the Medical University of Warsaw Urology Department

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a renal lithiasis endoscopic treatment. It is usually two staged: it begins in the lithotomy position for ureteral catheter placement and retrograde pyelography and, subsequently, an optimal renal access is obtained in the prone position. The PNL is usually two staged. It begins in the lithotomy position for cystoscopic placement of ureteral catheter and retrograde pyelography and, subsequently, a patient is placed mainly in the prone position for percutaneous access and stone removal. This position offers more options for puncture.

In most of the centers, the PNL is done under GA, that is associated with a risk of complications due to putting an intubated, muscle-relaxed, unconscious patient in a prone position. Other complications, including blood transfusion, nausea and vomiting or fever, are more often observed after the general then after the regional anesthesia; the cost of general anesthesia is also higher. The regional anesthesia that can be performed independently for the PNL includes spinal, epidural or combined spinal-epidural blocks. A segmental epidural block is better than spinal anesthesia in terms of hemodynamic stability, postoperative analgesia, patient's satisfaction and reduced incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. For epidural anesthesia it takes longer to act than for spinal one but it allows avoiding the motor block so the patient can change the position from lithotomy into prone himself with a little assistance. The position of a patient should not be changed rapidly right after the spinal anesthesia has been performed, due to the risk of too high anesthesia level and hemodynamic complications.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the epidural anesthesia performed for PNL over the last decade in the Medical University of Warsaw Urology Department.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Warsaw, Poland, 02-005
        • Recruiting

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients that have PNL procedure performed in the Urology Department (Medical University of Warsaw) 2005-2015

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PNL procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no PNL procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
effectiveness of epidural anesthesia for PNL evaluated by a number of participants having this procedure completed
Time Frame: 5 months
The investigator evaluates whether the procedure could be completely performed under epidural anesthesia
5 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Epidural anesthesia complication rate evaluated by a number of vessel or spinal puncture
Time Frame: 5 months
The investigator counts all the vessel and spinal punctures done with the Tuohy needle
5 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 8, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nephrolithiasis

Subscribe