- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02998333
Chronic Ankle Instability, Surgical Repair: Open Versus Closed (CAISR)
Does Arthroscopic Anatomic Repair of the Anterior Talofibular Ligament Provide Better Functional Outcome Compared to Open Anatomic Repair in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability: a Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial
Rationale: Lateral ankle ligament injuries may be a result of ankle sprains. In 10-30% of patients with lateral ankle ligament injuries, chronic lateral ankle instability may be present. If conservative treatment fails, instability is treated surgically. Anatomic repair (also known as the Bröstrom procedure) is the current golden standard for surgical treatment of chronic ankle instability. The Bröstrom started out as an open technique and is now also performed arthroscopically. Both approaches are considered standard care and provide good results. Which approach is best, has not yet been researched. In this study it is hypothesized arthroscopic repair provides better functional outcome compared to open repair during short term follow-up.
Objective: The main objective of this study is to compare the functional outcome after arthroscopic and open anatomic repair in patients with chronic lateral ankle instability, and secondly to assess ankle stability and ankle Range of Motion (ROM) after arthroscopic and open ligament repair.
Study design: A Non-Blinded Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Study population: All patients willing to participate, from an age of 18 years old, with persisting ankle instability for at least 6 months, eligible for anatomic repair.
Intervention: Both groups of patients are surgically treated with anatomic repair of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL). One group is treated arthroscopically and the other by the open approach.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome measure is functional outcome 6 months after surgery measured using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score. The main study parameter is a difference of ≥10 2 points per FAOS subscale between both treatment groups (Minimal Important Change = 10 points; 2 per subscale).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Gwendolyn Vuurberg
- Phone Number: +31(0)205662474
- Email: g.vuurberg@amc.uva.nl
Study Locations
-
-
-
Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
- Recruiting
- AMC
-
Contact:
- G. Vuurberg
- Email: g.vuurberg@amc.uva.nl
-
-
-
-
-
Porto, Portugal
- Not yet recruiting
- Centro Hospitalar Povoa deVarzim
-
Contact:
- H.D. Pereira, MD
- Email: helderduartepereira@gmail.com
-
-
-
-
-
Lausanne, Switzerland
- Not yet recruiting
- Site Hôpital orthopédique
-
Contact:
- R. Baalbaki, MD
- Email: rayan.baalbaki@chuv.ch
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients are 18 years or older;
- Experience pain and/or a sensation of instability during sports and/or daily activity;
- Isolated lateral ankle instability;
- Planned for surgical repair of the ATFL;
- At least one previous episode of an ankle inversion sprain;
- Complaints for at least 6 months;
- Failed previous conservative treatment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Serious concomitant injury (like arthrosis, ruled out using an AP and lateral x-ray according to standard protocol);
- Foot or ankle fracture in past;
- Previous foot or ankle surgery;
- ROM restriction of >10 degrees;
- Medial instability;
- Severe misalignment;
- Ankle/foot deformities (e.g. severe flat foot);
- Systemic comorbidity leading to delayed recovery (e.g. Diabetes Mellitus, Rheumatoid Arthritis)
- (general) Hyper laxity
- Inability or unwillingness to provide consent
- Present factors that may cause difficulty of follow-up
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Open surgical ankle stabilization
These patients will receive open surgical stabilization of the ankle joint after failed conservative treatment with complaints for at least 6 months.
|
Surgical stabilization of the ankle joint, performed as an open or arthroscopic procedure.
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Arthroscopic surgical ankle stabilization
These patients will receive arthroscopic surgical stabilization of the ankle joint after failed conservative treatment with complaints for at least 6 months.
|
Surgical stabilization of the ankle joint, performed as an open or arthroscopic procedure.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Functional outcome
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The primary outcome measures is a difference in pain and disability between both treatment groups as measured a Functional Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) score change of ≥2 points per subscale measured at 6 months follow-up.
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Functional outcome FAOS
Time Frame: 3- and 6 months
|
For assessment disablement
|
3- and 6 months
|
Functional outcome Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain
Time Frame: 3- and 6 months
|
For pain assessment
|
3- and 6 months
|
Functional outcome Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)
Time Frame: 3- and 6 months
|
For instability assessment
|
3- and 6 months
|
Anterior Drawer Test (ADT)
Time Frame: Pre-operative, instraoperative, 3- and 6 months postoperative
|
The anterior drawer test is registered per mm (range 0-15mm) displacement and according to the manual anterior drawer test (M-ATT) categories (grade 0-3).
|
Pre-operative, instraoperative, 3- and 6 months postoperative
|
Range of Motion (ROM)
Time Frame: Pre-operative, instraoperative, 3- and 6 months postoperative
|
ROM is registered in degrees of dorsi- and plantarflexion and is measured using a goniometer.
Assessment is performed pre-operatively, and at 3- and 6-months postoperatively.
|
Pre-operative, instraoperative, 3- and 6 months postoperative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: G.M.M.J. Kerkhoffs, Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kobayashi T, Gamada K. Lateral Ankle Sprain and Chronic Ankle Instability: A Critical Review. Foot Ankle Spec. 2014 Aug 1;7(4):298-326. doi: 10.1177/1938640014539813. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
- Brostrom L. Sprained ankles. VI. Surgical treatment of "chronic" ligament ruptures. Acta Chir Scand. 1966 Nov;132(5):551-65. No abstract available.
- Mabit, C.C., J.M.; Fiorenza, F.; Huc, H.; Pecout, C., Lateral ligament reconstruction of the ankle: comparative study of peroneus brevis tenodesis versus periosteal ligamentoplasty. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 1998. 4(2): p. 6.
- Pereira H, Vuurberg G, Gomes N, Oliveira JM, Ripoll PL, Reis RL, Espregueira-Mendes J, Niek van Dijk C. Arthroscopic Repair of Ankle Instability With All-Soft Knotless Anchors. Arthrosc Tech. 2016 Feb 1;5(1):e99-e107. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2015.10.010. eCollection 2016 Feb.
- Drakos MC, Behrens SB, Paller D, Murphy C, DiGiovanni CW. Biomechanical Comparison of an Open vs Arthroscopic Approach for Lateral Ankle Instability. Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Aug;35(8):809-815. doi: 10.1177/1071100714535765. Epub 2014 May 21.
- Matsui K, Takao M, Miyamoto W, Matsushita T. Early recovery after arthroscopic repair compared to open repair of the anterior talofibular ligament for lateral instability of the ankle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Jan;136(1):93-100. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2342-3. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2016_136#B2016709
- NL55707.018.16 (REGISTRY: ABR-form (toetsingonline.nl))
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Ankle Instability
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillAcademy of Orthopaedic Physical TherapyCompletedChronic Ankle InstabilityUnited States
-
Linnaeus UniversityCompletedChronic Ankle InstabilitySweden
-
Yeditepe UniversityCompleted
-
Istanbul Gelisim UniversityCompleted
-
National Yang Ming UniversityCompletedChronic Ankle InstabilityTaiwan
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedChronic Ankle Instability
-
University of VirginiaCompleted
-
Chonbuk National University HospitalCompletedChronic Ankle InstabilityKorea, Republic of
-
University GhentCompletedChronic Ankle InstabilityBelgium
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc; Flevoziekenhuis; Slotervaart HospitalRecruiting
Clinical Trials on Surgical stabilization
-
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRecruitingSPINAL Fracture | Burst Fracture | Spinal Instability of Thoracolumbar RegionSwitzerland
-
Uppsala UniversityKarolinska University Hospital; Karolinska Institutet; Oslo University Hospital; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Denver Health and Hospital AuthorityDePuy SynthesCompleted
-
UMC UtrechtWithdrawnNeoplasm Metastasis | Surgery | Spinal Neoplasms | RadiosurgeryNetherlands
-
Balgrist University HospitalWithdrawnSpinal TumorSwitzerland
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)Completed
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreCompletedRotator Cuff Impingement SyndromeCanada
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsBrown University; LifespanCompletedTraumatic Amputation of ArmUnited States
-
Real Fundación Victoria EugeniaUnknownSports Physical TherapySpain
-
Prof A Gruca Teaching HospitalRecruiting