- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03009409
The Effect of Low Dose Intra-operative Ketamine on Closed-loop Controlled General Anesthesia
Closed-loop control of anesthesia involves using feedback from a measure of clinical effect to continuously adjust drug infusion rates. As a result, anesthetic drugs are delivered at a variable rate that is frequently personalized to each individual patient. The aim is to provide greater stability at an optimal depth of anesthesia, reducing the occurrence of under- or overdosing, with the goal of ultimately improving patient outcomes.
The purpose of this randomized, controlled equivalence trial is to compare controller performance during closed-loop controlled induction and maintenance of total intravenous anesthesia, using iControl system, with the addition of a low (analgesic) dose of ketamine versus saline control.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
For the primary outcome measure, the investigators hypothesize that controller performance with low-dose ketamine will be equivalent to the controller performance without low-dose ketamine. The primary outcome measure, controller performance, is the percentage of time during the maintenance phase when the depth-of-hypnosis (DOH) measure is within +-10 points of the set point in patients receiving low dose ketamine versus those receiving saline control.
This study will consider other clinical data of interest from both intra- and post-operative contexts in order to establish a broader understanding of the potential implications of the use of a low dose of ketamine during closed-loop controlled anesthesia. In the OR, the investigators will record other indications of anesthetic quality, such as vital signs and the occurrence of any unwanted intra-operative events. Propofol and remifentanil consumption will be quantified, and the requirement of any other interventions will be recorded. The investigators will also record post-operative patient outcomes that have previously been associated with ketamine administration, such as acute post-operative pain intensity, opioid requirements, the occurrence of PONV, and shivering occurring in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
British Columbia
-
Port Moody, British Columbia, Canada, V3H 3W9
- Fraser Health: Eagle Ridge Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 19-54
- ASA I-II
- BMI 15-45
- Elective ACL repair surgery requiring general anesthesia
- Ability to read and understand the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contraindications to ketamine use Those in whom a significant elevation of blood pressure would constitute a serious hazard (e.g. severe cardiovascular disease, pacemaker, pheochromocytoma, malignant hypertension, intraocular pressure pathology, acute globe injury, hyperthyroidism)
- Contraindications to propofol Anaphylactic reaction to eggs, egg products, soybeans or soy products
- Contraindications to remifentanil Hypersensitivity to fentanyl analogues
- Known or suspected neurological disease Tumor, stroke, neurodegenerative disease, major head injury, seizure disorder Abnormality in any previous EEG examination Cognitive deficits (e.g. dementia, developmental delay)
- Acquired scalp or skull abnormalities
- Psychiatric illness Severe depression, PTSD, psychosis Any psychotropic medication taken in the past 7 days
- History of drug misuse/abuse within past 30 days Ketamine, cocaine, heroin, amphetamines, phencyclindine, lysergic acid (LSD), mescaline, psilocybin Chronic alcoholism
- Requirement for pre-operative sedative medication (e.g. midazolam) for anxiolysis
- Anticipated intra-operative or pre-operative use of nitrous oxide, catecholamines (dopamine, epinephrine, norepinephrine) or thyroid hormones
- Pregnant or nursing
- Currently enrolled in any other research study involving drugs or devices
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Ketamine Group
Participants randomized to the ketamine group will receive a 0.25 mg/kg loading dose of intravenous ketamine immediately before induction of anesthesia, followed by a continuous 5 mcg/kg/min infusion throughout maintenance of anesthesia, for approximately 45 minutes, up to a maximum cumulative dose of 100 mg.
This dose is in accordance with the guidelines from the recently published Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of post-operative pain.
The attending anesthesiologist will confirm whether the use of ketamine is appropriate for each patient prior to enrolling the patient in the study.
|
Once IV access has been obtained and a facemask has been applied for pre-oxygenation, the loading dose (0.25 mg/kg) of the study drug will be given over 60 seconds and the fixed infusion (5 mcg/kg/min to a maximum of 60 mg/hour) will be initiated by the anesthetist through the pump interface. The study drug will be infused at a constant rate of 5 mcg/kg/min throughout the maintenance phase, until the end of the procedure (last suture), up to a maximum cumulative dose of 100 mg. If at any point the anesthesiologist feels that it is clinically necessary to reduce the amount of study drug infusion rate, they may opt to reduce the infusion rate by 50% (to 2.5 mcg/kg/min), or stop the infusion entirely. |
|
Placebo Comparator: Control Group
Participants in the control group will receive an equivalent volume bolus and infusion of normal saline to mimic the ketamine infusion.
|
Participants in the control group will receive an equivalent volume bolus and infusion of normal saline to mimic the ketamine infusion in the ketamine group.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Controller performance
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
The primary outcome measure for this equivalence trial is 'controller performance', calculated as the percentage of time during the maintenance phase when the depth-of-hypnosis (DOH) measure is within ±10 points of the set point.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Vital signs
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
In the OR, the investigators will record other indications of anesthetic quality, such as vital signs and the occurrence of any unwanted intra-operative events. Propofol and remifentanil consumption will be quantified, and the requirement of any other interventions will be recorded. The investigators will also record post-operative patient outcomes that have previously been associated with ketamine administration, such as acute post-operative pain intensity, opioid requirements, the occurrence of PONV, and shivering occurring in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Analysis of group differences in secondary intra-operative and post-operative measures will be mainly exploratory, as this study was not designed to detect a definitive difference between these variables. Rather, these data may contribute to a developing body of evidence elucidating the potential benefits of low dose ketamine. Any outliers will be described and discussed on a case-by-base / incidence basis. |
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Number of unwanted intra-operative events
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
In the OR, the investigators will record other indications of anesthetic quality, such as vital signs and the occurrence of any unwanted intra-operative events. Propofol and remifentanil consumption will be quantified, and the requirement of any other interventions will be recorded. The investigators will also record post-operative patient outcomes that have previously been associated with ketamine administration, such as acute post-operative pain intensity, opioid requirements, the occurrence of PONV, and shivering occurring in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Analysis of group differences in secondary intra-operative and post-operative measures will be mainly exploratory, as this study was not designed to detect a definitive difference between these variables. Rather, these data may contribute to a developing body of evidence elucidating the potential benefits of low dose ketamine. Any outliers will be described and discussed on a case-by-base / incidence basis. |
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Propofol consumption
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
In the OR, the investigators will record other indications of anesthetic quality, such as vital signs and the occurrence of any unwanted intra-operative events. Propofol and remifentanil consumption will be quantified, and the requirement of any other interventions will be recorded. The investigators will also record post-operative patient outcomes that have previously been associated with ketamine administration, such as acute post-operative pain intensity, opioid requirements, the occurrence of PONV, and shivering occurring in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Analysis of group differences in secondary intra-operative and post-operative measures will be mainly exploratory, as this study was not designed to detect a definitive difference between these variables. Rather, these data may contribute to a developing body of evidence elucidating the potential benefits of low dose ketamine. Any outliers will be described and discussed on a case-by-base / incidence basis. |
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Remifentanil consumption
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
In the OR, the investigators will record other indications of anesthetic quality, such as vital signs and the occurrence of any unwanted intra-operative events. Propofol and remifentanil consumption will be quantified, and the requirement of any other interventions will be recorded. The investigators will also record post-operative patient outcomes that have previously been associated with ketamine administration, such as acute post-operative pain intensity, opioid requirements, the occurrence of PONV, and shivering occurring in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Analysis of group differences in secondary intra-operative and post-operative measures will be mainly exploratory, as this study was not designed to detect a definitive difference between these variables. Rather, these data may contribute to a developing body of evidence elucidating the potential benefits of low dose ketamine. Any outliers will be described and discussed on a case-by-base / incidence basis. |
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Post-operative pain intensity
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
In the OR, the investigators will record other indications of anesthetic quality, such as vital signs and the occurrence of any unwanted intra-operative events. Propofol and remifentanil consumption will be quantified, and the requirement of any other interventions will be recorded. The investigators will also record post-operative patient outcomes that have previously been associated with ketamine administration, such as acute post-operative pain intensity, opioid requirements, the occurrence of PONV, and shivering occurring in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Analysis of group differences in secondary intra-operative and post-operative measures will be mainly exploratory, as this study was not designed to detect a definitive difference between these variables. Rather, these data may contribute to a developing body of evidence elucidating the potential benefits of low dose ketamine. Any outliers will be described and discussed on a case-by-base / incidence basis. |
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Number of participants experiencing PONV
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
In the OR, the investigators will record other indications of anesthetic quality, such as vital signs and the occurrence of any unwanted intra-operative events. Propofol and remifentanil consumption will be quantified, and the requirement of any other interventions will be recorded. The investigators will also record post-operative patient outcomes that have previously been associated with ketamine administration, such as acute post-operative pain intensity, opioid requirements, the occurrence of PONV, and shivering occurring in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Analysis of group differences in secondary intra-operative and post-operative measures will be mainly exploratory, as this study was not designed to detect a definitive difference between these variables. Rather, these data may contribute to a developing body of evidence elucidating the potential benefits of low dose ketamine. Any outliers will be described and discussed on a case-by-base / incidence basis. |
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Number of participants experiencing shivering in PACU
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
In the OR, the investigators will record other indications of anesthetic quality, such as vital signs and the occurrence of any unwanted intra-operative events. Propofol and remifentanil consumption will be quantified, and the requirement of any other interventions will be recorded. The investigators will also record post-operative patient outcomes that have previously been associated with ketamine administration, such as acute post-operative pain intensity, opioid requirements, the occurrence of PONV, and shivering occurring in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Analysis of group differences in secondary intra-operative and post-operative measures will be mainly exploratory, as this study was not designed to detect a definitive difference between these variables. Rather, these data may contribute to a developing body of evidence elucidating the potential benefits of low dose ketamine. Any outliers will be described and discussed on a case-by-base / incidence basis. |
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Richard Merchant, MD FRCPC, Fraser Health
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics, Dissociative
- Anesthetics, Intravenous
- Anesthetics, General
- Anesthetics
- Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists
- Excitatory Amino Acid Agents
- Ketamine
Other Study ID Numbers
- 925-0702-DCI
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anesthesia
-
Samsun UniversityCompletedAnesthesia | Regional Anesthesia | Anesthesia ManagementTurkey
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedAnesthesia, Local | Anesthesia | Anesthesia; Adverse EffectGermany
-
Novocol Pharmaceutical of Canada, Inc.CompletedAnesthesia, Local | Dental Anesthesia | Anesthesia, ReversalUnited States
-
Universitas Sebelas MaretIndonesia Endowment Fund for EducationNot yet recruitingAnesthesia | Anesthesia; Reaction
-
University Health Network, TorontoActive, not recruiting
-
University of PecsCompleted
-
Hormozgan University of Medical SciencesUnknownAnesthesia | Anesthesia; FunctionalIran, Islamic Republic of
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentCompletedAnesthesia | Sedation | Anesthesia, Intravenous | Sedation Complication | Recovery From Anesthesia | Monitoring of Depth of AnesthesiaTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Aligarh Muslim UniversityCompletedAnesthesia | Anesthesia Intubation Complication | Anesthesia; Adverse EffectIndia
-
University of ChicagoWithdrawnAnesthesia | Patient Satisfaction | Anesthesia Risks | Anesthesia Consent | Consent RetentionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Ketamine Injectable Solution
-
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal CreteilPr Xavier DURRMEYERNot yet recruitingNeonatal Respiratory Failure | Invasive Ventilation | Infant Pain | Infant Discomfort | Infant NeurodevelopmentFrance
-
University Hospital, MontpellierHospices Civils de Lyon; Direction Générale de l'Offre de Soins; IBSA Institut...Not yet recruitingPregnancy | Progesterone Supplementation | Low Serum ProgesteroneFrance
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceNot yet recruitingErosive Hand OsteoarthritisFrance
-
Grifols Biologicals, LLCRecruitingChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Multiple Myeloma, or Non-Hodgkin LymphomaUnited States
-
University of British ColumbiaTerminatedSuicidal IdeationCanada
-
Alcon ResearchTerminatedOcular Hypertension | Open-angle Glaucoma
-
Pamukkale UniversityCompletedPrimary DysmenorrheaTurkey
-
Poznan University of Medical SciencesEnrolling by invitationXerostomia Due to Hyposecretion of Salivary GlandPoland
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyRecruiting
-
Poznan University of Medical SciencesRecruitingHip Pain Chronic | Hip Osteoarthritis | Hip ArthropathyPoland