Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Cognition in Diabetic Elderly at High Dementia Risk

July 23, 2025 updated by: Michal Beeri, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
An urgent need exists to identify effective interventions to arrest or reverse dementia and cognitive loss at its earliest stages. The proposed pilot randomized clinical trial will investigate the short and long-term effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on cognitive functioning, cerebral blood flow, and glucose uptake in diabetic elderly with mild cognitive impairment. and provide the basis for a large-scale multi-center study of hyperbaric oxygen therapy effects on cognition in diabetes. The potential to preserve, or even enhance, cognition in elderly at high risk of cognitive decline and dementia has major implications for the affected individuals and their support systems that bear the social and financial burdens of long-term caregiving.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This resubmission responds to "PAR-16-365-Pilot Clinical Trials for the Spectrum of Alzheimer's Disease and Age-related Cognitive Decline (R01)". It will examine the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in improving cognitive functioning in cognitively impaired elderly with diabetes (T2D), who have high risk for dementia. It is a collaboration of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, the University of Wisconsin, the Sagol Center for Hyperbaric Medicine and Research at Asaf Harofeh Medical Center, Israel-one of the world's largest and busiest hyperbaric units-and the Sheba Medical Center, Israel.

HBOT is a treatment in which oxygen-enriched air (up to 100%) is administered to patients at a pressure above the ambient atmosphere. The combined action of hyperoxia and hyperbaric pressure leads to significant improvements in tissue oxygenation, resulting in cerebrovascular benefits with improved ischemic damage and cerebral blood flow. Recently, the researchers of this group published compelling evidence from clinical trials indicating HBOT neurotherapeutic effects in stroke, with better cognitive function and elevated brain activity in SPECT. New preliminary data suggests potential neurotherapeutic effects of HBOT on T2D elderly with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), showing better cognitive performance and brain activity. The researchers propose a randomized controlled clinical trial examining the short (12 weeks) and long-term (12 months) efficacy of HBOT. The researchers will test hypotheses that HBOT compared to a sham condition improves cognitive function and increases cerebral blood flow and glucose utilization in MCI patients with T2D. Such patients are at high dementia risk and enriched in cerebrovascular disease, and thus have high potential for benefitting from HBOT. Aim 1 examines the potential beneficial effects of HBOT on cognition (with a primary composite measure of executive functions and episodic memory, both affected by T2D). Aim 2 examines effects of HBOT on ischemic injury which will be measured by CBF at the level of capillaries in gray matter (by MRI arterial spin labeling), and in macrovessels (by a novel 4D Flow MRI technology developed by the researchers of this group). Aim 3 focuses on effects of HBOT on cerebral glucose utilization using [F18]FDG-PET. Finally, Aim 4 investigates mediation by the biomarkers, i.e. whether their inclusion in a mediation model will attenuate the effect of HBOT on cognition, suggesting them as underlying mechanisms. This study will be performed in Israel, where there is optimal infrastructure and expertise for all the study components at significantly lower costs. HBOT can be widely deployed in the US so if successful, this pilot study will provide the basis for a multi-center large-scale clinical trial for definitive evidence of its benefits to cognition in T2D patients at high dementia risk. Despite advances in the understanding of risk factors and the pathologic basis for dementia, treatments are of very limited effects. As the proportion of elderly increases, the accelerating prevalence of T2D and dementia amplifies this application's public health impact.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

155

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ramat Gan, Israel
        • Sheba Medical Center
      • Tzrifin, Israel, 70300
        • Assaf Harofeh Medical Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53076
        • University of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of T2D
  • Diagnosis of MCI
  • > the age of 65
  • Hebrew fluency
  • An informant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Brain disease that affects cognition (e.g. Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia).
  • Stroke
  • Epilepsy
  • Chest pathology incompatible with HBOT
  • Inner ear disease
  • Claustrophobia
  • Cholinesterase inhibitors
  • Subjects with an indication for HBOT
  • Counter-indication for MRI or PET
  • Individuals with severe cataracts must have cataract operations before enrolling in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HBOT intervention
The multiplace HBOT unit at Asaf Harofeh. The inside looks like an airplane, with comfortable chairs for 11 subjects and the nurse who stays throughout the session. The HBOT protocol is 90 minutes, 5 times/week, 60 sessions, 100% oxygen at 2 ATA with 5 minute air breaks every 30 minutes.

HBOT is a treatment in which oxygen-enriched air (up to 100%) is administered to patients at a pressure.

HBOT intervention arm - 3 months of HBOT treatment, 9 months observation

all participants receive HBOT treatment for 3 months at year 2

Other Names:
  • Hyperbaric oxygen therapy
Sham Comparator: Sham intervention
Except for pressure, all the conditions of the HBOT intervention are provided in the sham intervention (nurse measures vitals and asks about health before entering the chamber, time in the chamber, number of sessions per week and overall, nurse in the chamber at all times, mask on the face, etc.).

HBOT is a treatment in which oxygen-enriched air (up to 100%) is administered to patients at a pressure.

HBOT intervention arm - 3 months of HBOT treatment, 9 months observation

all participants receive HBOT treatment for 3 months at year 2

Other Names:
  • Hyperbaric oxygen therapy
Sham was selected as the control condition rather than "usual care" to equate intervention groups with respect to other variables that could influence cognition and functional status, such as a new challenge (completing an activity program), peer socialization, and attention from staff.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Global Cognition Score
Time Frame: baseline, 12, weeks, 6 months and 12 months

This analysis involves 11 cognitive performance variables, each measuring a specific aspect of cognition. In general, higher scores indicate better performance (Digit Symbol measures processing speed, Semantic Fluency measures verbal fluency, Word Recall Task measures immediate verbal memory, Delayed Word Recall Test measures delayed verbal memory, and Recall Unit measures immediate and delayed story recall), except for two variables (Trail Making Test Part A measures processing speed, Trail Making Test Part B measures cognitive flexibility) that measure time (where higher values indicate worse performance). These variables are standardized using Z-scores, which allow for combining and comparing values across different scales.

The standardized values (Z-scores) of all 11 measures are averaged to create the composite score. Full range of composite score is -1 to 1. Higher composite Z-score reflects better cognitive performance and more favorable outcomes.

baseline, 12, weeks, 6 months and 12 months
Cerebral Blood Flow
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, and 12 months
Cerebral blood flow (CBF) via arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging (ASL-MRI). CBF is defined as the blood volume that flows per unit mass per unit time in brain tissue.
baseline, 3 months, and 12 months
Whole Brain SUVr (FDG-PET)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 12 months
Measures how actively the brain uses glucose, highlighting areas with abnormal activity that may signal diseases like Alzheimer's. Dimmer areas suggest reduced activity seen in disorders like dementia.
Baseline, 12 weeks, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NIH Computerized Cognitive Test
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months

The sum z-scores for 3 computer-based tests (not language dependent), developed through NIH; EXAMINER assessing executive abilities: http://examiner.ucsf.edu).

Early in the study, it became clear that participants-older adults with significant frailty, multiple chronic conditions (average >4 per participant), and high medication burden (mean >5 medications)-were finding the assessment protocol burdensome.

The protocol already required repeated cognitive testing, MRI, FDG-PET imaging, and other assessments, leading many participants to report fatigue and difficulty concentrating. To prioritize participant well-being, decision made not to add the NIH computerized cognitive tests. The existing paper-and-pencil battery was well-established, sensitive to cognitive changes, and adequately covered executive function and episodic memory.

The NIH computerized cognitive test was never administered, and no data was collected at any time.

Baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB)
Time Frame: baseline, 12, weeks, 6 months and 12 months

Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), which summarizes impairment in 6 domains (memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care) based on subject and informant interviews. Scores in each of these are combined to obtain a composite score ranging from 0 (no symptoms of dementia) through 3 (severe symptoms of dementia).

Total scale from 0-18. Higher scores indicating worse cognitive status.

baseline, 12, weeks, 6 months and 12 months
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
This is a 21-item, self-report questionnaire that measures attitudes and symptoms of depression during the last week (i.e. mood, feelings of hopelessness, failure, guilt, self-esteem, etc.). Each question has a set of at least four possible responses, ranging in intensity. Total scale 0-63. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms of depression.
baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living - Prevention Questionnaire (ADL-PI)
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months

ADL questionnaire Participant

The ADL-PI was developed, comprising 15 ADL (e.g. managing medications, managing finances) and 5 physical function (e.g. shopping and meal preparation) questions. All responses relate to the 3 months prior to the time of rating.

Total range 0-30, higher scores indicate greater impairment.

baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months
Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living - Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-ADL MCI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months

ADL Informant

This tool is based on caregiver's report to assess participants' abilities to perform basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADLs) like bathing, walking and self-grooming. All responses should relate to the 4 weeks prior to the time of rating. Full Scale range from 0-53, higher score indicates more impairment for the participant.

Baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months
Total Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months
Total range 0-30, higher scores indicate better cognitive function.
Baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mary Sano, PhD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Principal Investigator: Michal Schnaider-Beeri, PhD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2017

First Posted (Estimated)

January 30, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified MRI and PET scans and cognitive scores will be made available for investigative collaborations. We expect to share these data with a large number of investigators throughout the world.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on HBOT intervention

Subscribe