- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03036254
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Cognition in Diabetic Elderly at High Dementia Risk
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This resubmission responds to "PAR-16-365-Pilot Clinical Trials for the Spectrum of Alzheimer's Disease and Age-related Cognitive Decline (R01)". It will examine the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in improving cognitive functioning in cognitively impaired elderly with diabetes (T2D), who have high risk for dementia. It is a collaboration of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, the University of Wisconsin, the Sagol Center for Hyperbaric Medicine and Research at Asaf Harofeh Medical Center, Israel-one of the world's largest and busiest hyperbaric units-and the Sheba Medical Center, Israel.
HBOT is a treatment in which oxygen-enriched air (up to 100%) is administered to patients at a pressure above the ambient atmosphere. The combined action of hyperoxia and hyperbaric pressure leads to significant improvements in tissue oxygenation, resulting in cerebrovascular benefits with improved ischemic damage and cerebral blood flow. Recently, the researchers of this group published compelling evidence from clinical trials indicating HBOT neurotherapeutic effects in stroke, with better cognitive function and elevated brain activity in SPECT. New preliminary data suggests potential neurotherapeutic effects of HBOT on T2D elderly with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), showing better cognitive performance and brain activity. The researchers propose a randomized controlled clinical trial examining the short (12 weeks) and long-term (12 months) efficacy of HBOT. The researchers will test hypotheses that HBOT compared to a sham condition improves cognitive function and increases cerebral blood flow and glucose utilization in MCI patients with T2D. Such patients are at high dementia risk and enriched in cerebrovascular disease, and thus have high potential for benefitting from HBOT. Aim 1 examines the potential beneficial effects of HBOT on cognition (with a primary composite measure of executive functions and episodic memory, both affected by T2D). Aim 2 examines effects of HBOT on ischemic injury which will be measured by CBF at the level of capillaries in gray matter (by MRI arterial spin labeling), and in macrovessels (by a novel 4D Flow MRI technology developed by the researchers of this group). Aim 3 focuses on effects of HBOT on cerebral glucose utilization using [F18]FDG-PET. Finally, Aim 4 investigates mediation by the biomarkers, i.e. whether their inclusion in a mediation model will attenuate the effect of HBOT on cognition, suggesting them as underlying mechanisms. This study will be performed in Israel, where there is optimal infrastructure and expertise for all the study components at significantly lower costs. HBOT can be widely deployed in the US so if successful, this pilot study will provide the basis for a multi-center large-scale clinical trial for definitive evidence of its benefits to cognition in T2D patients at high dementia risk. Despite advances in the understanding of risk factors and the pathologic basis for dementia, treatments are of very limited effects. As the proportion of elderly increases, the accelerating prevalence of T2D and dementia amplifies this application's public health impact.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sheba Medical Center
-
Tzrifin, Israel, 70300
- Assaf Harofeh Medical Center
-
-
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10029
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53076
- University of Wisconsin
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of T2D
- Diagnosis of MCI
- > the age of 65
- Hebrew fluency
- An informant
Exclusion Criteria:
- Brain disease that affects cognition (e.g. Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia).
- Stroke
- Epilepsy
- Chest pathology incompatible with HBOT
- Inner ear disease
- Claustrophobia
- Cholinesterase inhibitors
- Subjects with an indication for HBOT
- Counter-indication for MRI or PET
- Individuals with severe cataracts must have cataract operations before enrolling in the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: HBOT intervention
The multiplace HBOT unit at Asaf Harofeh.
The inside looks like an airplane, with comfortable chairs for 11 subjects and the nurse who stays throughout the session.
The HBOT protocol is 90 minutes, 5 times/week, 60 sessions, 100% oxygen at 2 ATA with 5 minute air breaks every 30 minutes.
|
HBOT is a treatment in which oxygen-enriched air (up to 100%) is administered to patients at a pressure. HBOT intervention arm - 3 months of HBOT treatment, 9 months observation all participants receive HBOT treatment for 3 months at year 2
Other Names:
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham intervention
Except for pressure, all the conditions of the HBOT intervention are provided in the sham intervention (nurse measures vitals and asks about health before entering the chamber, time in the chamber, number of sessions per week and overall, nurse in the chamber at all times, mask on the face, etc.).
|
HBOT is a treatment in which oxygen-enriched air (up to 100%) is administered to patients at a pressure. HBOT intervention arm - 3 months of HBOT treatment, 9 months observation all participants receive HBOT treatment for 3 months at year 2
Other Names:
Sham was selected as the control condition rather than "usual care" to equate intervention groups with respect to other variables that could influence cognition and functional status, such as a new challenge (completing an activity program), peer socialization, and attention from staff.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Global Cognition Score
Time Frame: baseline, 12, weeks, 6 months and 12 months
|
This analysis involves 11 cognitive performance variables, each measuring a specific aspect of cognition. In general, higher scores indicate better performance (Digit Symbol measures processing speed, Semantic Fluency measures verbal fluency, Word Recall Task measures immediate verbal memory, Delayed Word Recall Test measures delayed verbal memory, and Recall Unit measures immediate and delayed story recall), except for two variables (Trail Making Test Part A measures processing speed, Trail Making Test Part B measures cognitive flexibility) that measure time (where higher values indicate worse performance). These variables are standardized using Z-scores, which allow for combining and comparing values across different scales. The standardized values (Z-scores) of all 11 measures are averaged to create the composite score. Full range of composite score is -1 to 1. Higher composite Z-score reflects better cognitive performance and more favorable outcomes. |
baseline, 12, weeks, 6 months and 12 months
|
|
Cerebral Blood Flow
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, and 12 months
|
Cerebral blood flow (CBF) via arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging (ASL-MRI).
CBF is defined as the blood volume that flows per unit mass per unit time in brain tissue.
|
baseline, 3 months, and 12 months
|
|
Whole Brain SUVr (FDG-PET)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 12 months
|
Measures how actively the brain uses glucose, highlighting areas with abnormal activity that may signal diseases like Alzheimer's.
Dimmer areas suggest reduced activity seen in disorders like dementia.
|
Baseline, 12 weeks, 12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
NIH Computerized Cognitive Test
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
|
The sum z-scores for 3 computer-based tests (not language dependent), developed through NIH; EXAMINER assessing executive abilities: http://examiner.ucsf.edu). Early in the study, it became clear that participants-older adults with significant frailty, multiple chronic conditions (average >4 per participant), and high medication burden (mean >5 medications)-were finding the assessment protocol burdensome. The protocol already required repeated cognitive testing, MRI, FDG-PET imaging, and other assessments, leading many participants to report fatigue and difficulty concentrating. To prioritize participant well-being, decision made not to add the NIH computerized cognitive tests. The existing paper-and-pencil battery was well-established, sensitive to cognitive changes, and adequately covered executive function and episodic memory. The NIH computerized cognitive test was never administered, and no data was collected at any time. |
Baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
|
|
Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB)
Time Frame: baseline, 12, weeks, 6 months and 12 months
|
Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), which summarizes impairment in 6 domains (memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care) based on subject and informant interviews. Scores in each of these are combined to obtain a composite score ranging from 0 (no symptoms of dementia) through 3 (severe symptoms of dementia). Total scale from 0-18. Higher scores indicating worse cognitive status. |
baseline, 12, weeks, 6 months and 12 months
|
|
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
|
This is a 21-item, self-report questionnaire that measures attitudes and symptoms of depression during the last week (i.e.
mood, feelings of hopelessness, failure, guilt, self-esteem, etc.).
Each question has a set of at least four possible responses, ranging in intensity.
Total scale 0-63.
Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms of depression.
|
baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
|
|
Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living - Prevention Questionnaire (ADL-PI)
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months
|
ADL questionnaire Participant The ADL-PI was developed, comprising 15 ADL (e.g. managing medications, managing finances) and 5 physical function (e.g. shopping and meal preparation) questions. All responses relate to the 3 months prior to the time of rating. Total range 0-30, higher scores indicate greater impairment. |
baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months
|
|
Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living - Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-ADL MCI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months
|
ADL Informant This tool is based on caregiver's report to assess participants' abilities to perform basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADLs) like bathing, walking and self-grooming. All responses should relate to the 4 weeks prior to the time of rating. Full Scale range from 0-53, higher score indicates more impairment for the participant. |
Baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months
|
|
Total Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months
|
Total range 0-30, higher scores indicate better cognitive function.
|
Baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mary Sano, PhD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
- Principal Investigator: Michal Schnaider-Beeri, PhD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- GCO 15-0192
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus
-
University of Colorado, DenverMassachusetts General Hospital; Beta Bionics, Inc.CompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1 | Type 1 Diabetes | Diabetes type1 | Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus | Autoimmune Diabetes | Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin-Dependent | Juvenile-Onset Diabetes | Diabetes, Autoimmune | Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus 1 | Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin-Dependent, 1 | Diabetes Mellitus, Brittle | Diabetes Mellitus, Juvenile-Onset and other conditionsUnited States
-
Guang NingRecruitingType 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Type1 Diabetes Mellitus | Monogenetic Diabetes | Pancreatogenic Diabetes | Drug-Induced Diabetes Mellitus | Other Forms of Diabetes MellitusChina
-
State University of New York at BuffaloMedical University of South CarolinaCompletedDiabetes Mellitus | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Adult-Onset Diabetes Mellitus | Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus | Noninsulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus, Type IIUnited States
-
Hanmi Pharmaceutical Company LimitedUnknownType2 Diabetes Mellitus | Type1 Diabetes MellitusUnited States
-
Meir Medical CenterCompletedDiabetes Mellitus Type 2 | Diabetes Mellitus, Non-insulin Dependant | Diabetes Mellitus, on Oral Hypoglycemic Treatment | Adult Type Diabetes MellitusIsrael
-
Medtronic MiniMed, Inc.RecruitingType 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Type 1 Diabetes MellitusUnited States, Australia, New Zealand
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalUnknownType 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus | Gestational Diabetes Mellitus | Pancreatogenic Diabetes Mellitus | Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus | Diabetes Patients in Perioperative PeriodChina
-
University of Colorado, DenverMassachusetts General Hospital; Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of... and other collaboratorsRecruitingDiabetes Mellitus | Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes | Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type I | Diabetes Mellitus Type II | Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin-Dependent | Diabetes, Autoimmune | Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) | Diabetes Type 2 on Insulin | Diabetes, Type IIUnited States
-
SanofiCompletedType 1 Diabetes Mellitus-Type 2 Diabetes MellitusHungary, Russian Federation, Germany, Poland, Japan, United States, Finland
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)CompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type II | Diabetes Mellitus, Adult-Onset | Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-Dependent | Diabetes Mellitus, Noninsulin DependentUnited States
Clinical Trials on HBOT intervention
-
Assaf Harofeh MCUnknown
-
University Hospital OstravaNot yet recruitingChronic Pain | Complex Regional Pain SyndromeCzechia
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...Recruiting
-
Assaf-Harofeh Medical CenterUnknownIntracranial Meningioma | Neurologic DeficitsIsrael
-
Abington Memorial HospitalPhiladelphia College of Osteopathic MedicineCompletedStroke | Ischemic Stroke | Chronic Stroke | Motor DysfunctionUnited States
-
RWTH Aachen UniversityCompletedWound Healing | MicrocirculationGermany
-
Assaf-Harofeh Medical CenterWeizmann Institute of Science; Office of Naval Research (ONR)RecruitingPTSD | Peritraumatic AmnesiaIsrael
-
Mrs. Thelma Zoegas FoundationLund University; Region Skåne Sweden; Gorthons Foundation Helsingborg SwedenCompletedDiabetes | Foot Ulcer | HealingSweden
-
Asociación Argentina de Medicina Hiperbárica e...Hospital de Infecciosas Francisco Javier Muniz; Hospital General de Agudos... and other collaboratorsTerminated