Randomised Study Comparing Two HIV Screening Strategies (PETTSEQ)

January 30, 2017 updated by: Olivier Hugli, University of Lausanne Hospitals

Randomised Study Comparing Two HIV Screening Strategies in the Emergency Department Using an Electronic Tablet Questionnaire: The PETTSEQ Study (PErformance of Two Testing Strategies by Electronic Questionnaire)

A randomised, single-blind study (the study investigator will not know which arm each patient is assigned to) conducted to examine the most effective strategy for conducting HIV testing in the Emergency Department (ED) using an electronic tablet. The study will take place in the ED at Lausanne University Hospital (LUH) between August and December 2015 in the context of the Masters project of a medical student studying at the Faculty of Medicine at Lausanne University.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In Switzerland, the national HIV testing recommendations have proposed targeted and diagnostic HIV testing since 2007. These recommendations list medical conditions and populations at risk in which HIV testing is indicated. The difficulty with this targeted approach is that it relies on medical personnel 1) to be aware that the medical conditions listed have an association with HIV infection and 2) to be able to identify their patients as coming from at-risk populations. In other countries, notably the United States, France and the United Kingdom, national HIV testing recommendations propose non-targeted screening whereby everyone presenting to a medical facility is tested if the HIV seroprevalence in the catchment population is above a defined threshold (0.1% for the US and France; 0.2% for the UK). As HIV seroprevalence in Switzerland already exceeds these thresholds, the current study will be performed to see whether non-targeted HIV testing using electronic tablets is acceptable and feasible in our Emergency Department (ED).

ED patients will be randomised to a targeted or non-targeted arm after consenting to participate. Eighty patients will be assigned to each study arm. Participating patients will be issued with an electronic tablet and invited to follow the instructions on the screen. Targeted arm patients will be invited to complete a questionnaire on HIV risk factors and, if one or more risk factors are present, they will be informed that HIV testing is indicated and will be invited to take a free rapid HIV test. Non-targeted arm patients will be provided with information about HIV and HIV testing and will then be invited to take a free rapid HIV test without any questions regarding risk factors. Patients in each arm who are either not offered (targeted arm) or who decline rapid testing (non-targeted arm) will undergo secondary cross-screening in which targeted arm patients will be automatically directed by the tablet to the non-targeted arm information page and non-targeted arm patients will be directed to the targeted arm questionnaire. The primary endpoint is patient acceptance of HIV testing. The secondary objective is to examine the effect of cross-screening strategies.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years old
  • Patients admitted to an ED examination cubicle within the preceding 12 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients clinically unstable (admitted to resus or considered unstable by the treating ED doctor)
  • Patients transferred from another hospital
  • Patients unable to provide informed consent (for example, through cognitive impairment, acute alcohol intoxication or intoxication by opiates or other psycho-active substances, acute psychosis, being hard of hearing or not French-speaking and with no interpreter)
  • Patients of known HIV+ status
  • Patients who have already been offered HIV screening during their ED visit by the treating ED doctor prior to enrolment in the study
  • Prisoners

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Targeted testing
Patients complete a questionnaire on risk factors for HIV acquisition and are offered rapid (fingerprick) HIV testing if their questionnaire responses indicate they have HIV risk factors
Other Names:
  • INSTI
Other: Non-targeted screening
Patients offered a brief information on HIV and HIV testing and are then offered rapid (fingerprick) HIV testing without completing an HIV risk factor assessment
Other Names:
  • INSTI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient acceptance of rapid HIV testing in the ED
Time Frame: 4 months
Patient acceptance of rapid HIV testing when offered by electronic questionnaire
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HIV testing rate after cross-screening strategy
Time Frame: 4 months
HIV testing accepted when patients without risk factors are offered testing or if patients offered testing without risk factor assessment then complete an assessment which shows they have risk factors for HIV acquisition
4 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ease of use of electronic questionnaire
Time Frame: 4 months
Degree of assistance required by patients when they use the electronic tablet
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 11, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 28, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

February 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on Rapid HIV test

3
Subscribe