A Comparison of Technegas and Xenon-133 Planar Lung Imaging in Subjects Referred for Ventilation Scintigraphy

August 30, 2021 updated by: Cyclomedica Australia PTY Limited

A Comparison of Technegas® and Xenon 133 Planar Lung Imaging in Subjects Referred for Ventilation Scintigraphy

Phase 3 within-subject non-inferiority trial of Technegas ventilation imaging compared to Xenon-133 (Xe-133) ventilation imaging to demonstrate the non-inferiority of Technegas compared to Xe-133 ventilation studies with respect to subject pulmonary ventilatory distribution. Subjects will undergo site-specific standard of care (SOC) Xe-133 imaging per medical needs followed by Technegas ventilation imaging per study protocol.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a Phase 3 within-subject non-inferiority trial of Technegas ventilation imaging compared to Xenon-133 (Xe-133) ventilation imaging to demonstrate the non-inferiority of Technegas compared to Xe-133 ventilation studies with respect to subject pulmonary ventilatory distribution. Subjects will undergo site-specific standard of care (SOC) Xe-133 imaging per medical needs followed by Technegas ventilation imaging per study protocol. Primary assessments of efficacy will be based on three blinded readers' assessments of the Technegas and Xe-133 ventilation images in independent reading sessions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

226

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Clearwater, Florida, United States, 33756
        • Morton Plant Hospital
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
        • Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, FL
    • Illinois
      • Maywood, Illinois, United States, 60153
        • Loyola University Medical Center
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University Medical Center, Barnes-Jewish Hospital - Center for Advanced Medicine
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Hospital
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Houston Methodist Hospital
      • Temple, Texas, United States, 76508
        • Scott & White Medical Center
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • University of Utah Health Science Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female subject at least 18 years of age.
  • Subject is a candidate for ventilation imaging.
  • Subject must be willing and able to provide informed consent.
  • Subject must be stable and able to undergo Xe-133 planar imaging and Technegas planar imaging.
  • Subject must be willing and agree to complete study procedures.
  • Subject is using adequate birth control, if female and fertile. Adequate birth control is defined as surgical sterilization, hormone contraceptive use or intrauterine device (IUD).
  • Female subject of child-bearing potential has a negative urine or serum pregnancy test.
  • Subject has had or is scheduled to have a chest X-ray within 24 hours prior to the investigational imaging study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has been administered any other radiopharmaceutical within a timeframe that might cause interference with study imaging.
  • Subject is a pregnant or lactating female.
  • Subject has received Technegas in the past.
  • Subject has received an investigational drug within 30 days prior to dosing.
  • Subject is hemodynamically unstable.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Xe-133 Followed by Technegas
Subjects first inhaled active comparator Xe-133, approximately 10 to 30 millicuries (mCi), and ventilation planar scintigraphy was performed per site standard of care procedures for subject medical need. On the same day, following completion of Xe-133 imaging, subjects inhaled experimental Technegas (Technetium-99m labeled carbon particles), approximately 1.1 mCi, and ventilation planar scintigraphy was performed.
Xe-133 ventilation scintigraphy
Other Names:
  • Xenon-133
  • Xenon gas
Technegas ventilation scintigraphy
Other Names:
  • Technetium-99m labeled carbon particles

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blinded Readers Percent Agreement (PA) for Matching Image Views
Time Frame: The median duration of Technegas imaging was 22 minutes. Blinded reader assessments of images ranged from <1 month to 16 months following the imaging (median 5 months).
Three blinded readers independently assessed the Xe-133 and Technegas images in separate reading sessions. Readers were blinded to all clinical information except a subject's screening chest X-ray. Xe-133 images were obtained per site-specific standard of care. Technegas images included a 6-view image set, and the primary endpoint was based on assessment of the subset of views that matched the Xe-133 image views. At the start of each case-read, a reader visually divided each lung into 3 regions of approximately equal size arranged craniocaudally (apical, mid, and basal), 6 regions in total, and then assessed each lung region for ventilation according to a three-point scale: 0=absent ventilation, 1=decreased ventilation, 2=normal ventilation. At the unplanned interim stage, PA between the Xe-133 scores and Technegas scores was tested for non-inferiority at one-sided alpha=0.0141, equivalent to the lower bound of the 97.18% confidence interval exceeding 60%.
The median duration of Technegas imaging was 22 minutes. Blinded reader assessments of images ranged from <1 month to 16 months following the imaging (median 5 months).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blinded Readers Percent Agreement (PA) for All Image Views
Time Frame: The median duration of Technegas imaging was 22 minutes. Blinded reader assessments of images ranged from <1 month to 16 months following the imaging (median 5 months).
Three blinded readers independently assessed the Xe-133 and Technegas images in separate reading sessions. Readers were blinded to all clinical information except a subject's screening chest X-ray. Xe-133 images were obtained per site-specific standard of care. Technegas images included a 6-view image set. Two sequential reads were conducted of each subject's Technegas images. In the first read, only views that matched the Xe-133 image views were presented and read, and assessments based on the matched views were used in the primary outcome measure. Immediately following the commitment of those assessments, all Technegas image views were presented to the reader, and a second assessment of all the Technegas image views was made using the same ventilation scoring metric as described for the primary outcome measure. The estimation of PA and its analyses were also the same as for the primary outcome measure.
The median duration of Technegas imaging was 22 minutes. Blinded reader assessments of images ranged from <1 month to 16 months following the imaging (median 5 months).
Percent Agreement Measuring Inter-observer Agreement
Time Frame: The median duration of Technegas imaging was 22 minutes. Blinded reader assessments of images ranged from <1 month to 16 months following the imaging (median 5 months).
Percent agreement (PA) measuring inter-observer agreement between pairs of blinded readers for their ventilation scoring assessments within each of the three imaging groups: Xe-133, Technegas matched views, and Technegas all views. For each image set, a reader scored 6 regions of the lungs according to a three-point scale: 0=absent ventilation, 1=decreased ventilation, 2=normal ventilation; agreement between a pair of readers' assessments was based on the agreement of their ventilation scores by subject and lung region.
The median duration of Technegas imaging was 22 minutes. Blinded reader assessments of images ranged from <1 month to 16 months following the imaging (median 5 months).
Kappa Statistics Between Pairs of Blinded Readers by Lung Region
Time Frame: The median duration of Technegas imaging was 22 minutes. Blinded reader assessments of images ranged from <1 month to 16 months following the imaging (median 5 months).
By lung-region kappa statistics measuring inter-observer agreement between pairs of blinded readers for their ventilation scoring assessments within each of the three imaging groups: Xe-133, Technegas matched views, and Technegas all views. For each image set, a reader scored 6 regions of the lungs according to a three-point scale: 0=absent ventilation, 1=decreased ventilation, 2=normal ventilation. Kappa statistics for a pair of readers' assessments were derived from the frequencies of the cross-tabulation of the readers' ventilation scores by lung region. Kappa statistics are an index of inter-observer agreement corrected for chance with possible values ranging from -1 to 1, where 1 represents perfect agreement.
The median duration of Technegas imaging was 22 minutes. Blinded reader assessments of images ranged from <1 month to 16 months following the imaging (median 5 months).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Edward M Aten, MD, Certus International, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 18, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

November 23, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Structure Determination

Clinical Trials on Xe-133

3
Subscribe