Promoting Children's Participation in Conventional X-ray Examinations

March 22, 2024 updated by: Lund University

The goal of this explorative observational study is to map the procedure and child centered approach in the examination for children that undergo conventional X-ray examinations. The main questions aim to answer:

  • How many images need to be retaken during conventional X-ray examinations?
  • What is the reason why the pictures need to be redone?
  • What is the time required for the various examinations?
  • What experience of the procedure of the examination is there among those involved?
  • Can the physical impact be observed through variation in heart rate in children that undergo conventional X-ray examinations?

Participants will answer questionnaires about the children's participation in the procedure and the variation in heart rate will be measured on the children who undergo the examinations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Many children receive healthcare services during their childhood. In Sweden, approximately 330,000 children aged 0-15 require conventional X-ray examinations annually. It is imperative that the justification for conducting these X-ray examinations on children is carefully considered. Improper positioning during the image capturing process can result in inadequate images that do not provide necessary diagnostic information. This may require that the X-ray procedure must be repeated, leading to unnecessary exposure of children to radiation. This situation poses complexities as a means to minimize the occurrence of repeated imaging procedures and minimize unnecessary radiation exposure, children may be subject to some level of restraint.

Effective January 1, 2020, Sweden adopted the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child into law, with the aim of enhancing and elucidating the rights of children.

This entails that children are entitled to receive care from personnel who possess the expertise and qualifications necessary to uphold both the physical and mental well-being of children, as well as their rights, prior to, during, and following a procedure such as an X-ray examination.

The radiographer plays a significant role in determining the outcome of pediatric examinations, impacting both the child's experience and the quality of imaging as well as the radiation dose received. This study investigates the perceptions of health care professionals regarding pediatric examinations, focusing on procedure, child centered approach, and overall experience during conventional X-ray procedures. Additionally, it explores the experiences of children and their parents during examinations, including children's level of participation in the process. It is also essential to evaluate the physical indicators, this in the form of changes in the child's pulse rate.

To establish a standard baseline for normal variation, investigators will measure pulse rates before, during, and after an examination using portable heart rate monitors.

The questionnaires will be answered by the population -children, parents and the examining radiographer after each examination has been completed and will mainly consist of shorter multiple-choice options with the possibility of extended answers in cases where additions need to be made.

For the parts that are common between the three groups, the questions to the children are taken from a questionnaire about children's participation. Parents and radiographers receive the same questions and answers on a Likert scale.

A descriptive and comparative analysis will be done with the support of different software, Excel and SPSS.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

220

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The population consists of the people who are involved with the child undergoing an X-ray examination.

Which are the children who are to undergo conventional x-rays and are between the ages of 4-12 years. Those who are accompanying this child and the radiographers who carry out the examination will also be there.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children ages 4-12 yrs who undergo standard x-ray examinations
  • parents to the child
  • assigned radiographers

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children and parents who have cognitive and/or language difficulties

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Pediatric patients
Pediatric patients between the ages of 4 and 12 undergoing conventional X-ray examinations.
The children will be given a portable device that will monitor their heart rate, enabling the recording of the rate of their pulse.
Parents
Parents of the included pediatric patients between the ages of 4 and 12 undergoing conventional X-ray examinations.
Radiographers
Radiographers who examine the included pediatric patients between the ages of 4 and 12 undergoing conventional X-ray examinations.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Variation in heart rate
Time Frame: The measurement is done through the examination total time 15 minutes (baseline before start 1-2 minutes, start of exam 2-10 minutes, end of exam after 10-15 minutes)
To compare the variations in pulse with the experience of the examination
The measurement is done through the examination total time 15 minutes (baseline before start 1-2 minutes, start of exam 2-10 minutes, end of exam after 10-15 minutes)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pether Jildenstål, Assoc. Prof., Lund University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 14, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 4, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-05435-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patient Participation

Clinical Trials on Measurement of variation in heart rate

3
Subscribe