- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03061903
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs Standard of Care (Prevena)
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy vs. Standard of Care for Surgical Incision Management in High-Risk Patients Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
High risk patients who receive direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty are more likely to experience wound complications. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the usage of closed incision negative pressure dressings decreases the risk of wound complication compared to standard dressings. Patients who decide to participate in the study will be randomized to one of the two dressing prior to surgery and will leave the operating room with one of the treating dressings. Patient will be monitored 90 days after surgery for wound complications and pictures of the wounds will be taken. The patients course of treatment besides being randomized to one of the two dressings will be identical to any other patient received a Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty (DAA THA).
The primary outcome measure will be uneventful wound healing (requiring no intervention) versus the occurrence of wound complications (wound drainage, breakdown, necrosis, dehiscence, superficial or deep infection) requiring additional intervention. Intervention will be defined as any attempt of the surgeon to improve wound healing (in-office debridement, topical ointment, aspiration, antibiotic therapy, or return to the OR for the wound). Secondary outcome measures will include duration of wound healing delay, length of hospital stay, number of days of antibiotic therapy, and direct and estimated indirect costs.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The goal of this study is to determine the efficacy of closed incision negative pressure therapy (CiNPT) for prevention of wound complications and return to the operating room for wound complications in patients with pre-determined risk factors that affect wound healing. This is will be a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Subjects will be randomly assigned to either the ciNPT intervention group or the control group using computer-generated, randomized envelopes with equal numbers in each treatment arm. Both dressings will be applied under sterile conditions at the end of the DAA THA surgery, while still in the operating room, and then removed after 7 days.
Patients randomized to the control group will receive a conformable, water resistant, silver-impregnated, antimicrobial hydrofiber dressing (AQUACEL® Ag, Convatec) which is currently the standard of care at our institution for postoperative wound dressing. This dressing is left in place for 7 days and then removed by the patient or visiting nurse at home. Patients randomized to the study group will receive an incisional ciNPT device, which is currently being used selectively in high-risk patients at our institution (Prevena™, KCI). Both wound dressings are FDA-approved devices. Due to the obvious difference in appearance of the two dressings, neither patients nor treating surgeons can be blinded to treatment arm.
Wounds will be assessed postoperatively at regular intervals until wound healing is achieved. This will occur at least 2 and 6 weeks after surgery, which are standard intervals in our current postoperative protocol. No additional office visits will be needed for patients in the control or treatment arms. Photodocumentation of the wounds will occur at two and six weeks postoperatively.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M3M 0B2
- Humber River Hospital
-
-
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10021
- Hospital for Special Surgery
-
New York, New York, United States, 10023
- Columbia University Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) through a direct anterior approach by one of the investigating surgeons; and
The presence of one or more of these risk factors for delayed or problematic wound healing:
- Diabetes
- Obesity (Body Mass Index (BMI) > 30)
- Active smoking
- Previous Hip Surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing primary THA through a different approach
- Patients undergoing primary THA through a direct anterior approach but without any of the above risk factors
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Prevena
Subjects will receive PREVENA after surgery.
|
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy (bandage over the incision sealed with negative pressure of a vacuum) to be placed on after surgery for 7 days. Prevena™, by KCI, is currently being used selectively in high-risk patients and a FDA-approved device.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Aquacel
Subjects will receive AQUACEL Ag after surgery.
|
Water resistant, silver-impregnated, antimicrobial hydrofiber dressing that is placed on after surgery for 7 days. AQUACEL® Ag, by Convatec, is currently the standard of care for postoperative wound dressing and a FDA-approved device.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Prevalence of Wound Complications
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
|
Occurrence of wound complications (wound drainage, breakdown, necrosis, dehiscence, superficial or deep infection) requiring additional intervention.
Intervention will be defined as any attempt of the surgeon to improve wound healing (in-office debridement, topical ointment, aspiration, antibiotic therapy, or return to the OR for the wound).
|
Up to 90 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of Patients With Superficial Surgical Site Infections
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Number of patients who met CDC criteria for superficial surgical site infection (SSI).
|
90 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Roshan P Shah, MD, Columbia University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Karlakki S, Brem M, Giannini S, Khanduja V, Stannard J, Martin R. Negative pressure wound therapy for managementof the surgical incision in orthopaedic surgery: A review of evidence and mechanisms for an emerging indication. Bone Joint Res. 2013 Dec 18;2(12):276-84. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.212.2000190. Print 2013.
- Grauhan O, Navasardyan A, Hofmann M, Muller P, Stein J, Hetzer R. Prevention of poststernotomy wound infections in obese patients by negative pressure wound therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 May;145(5):1387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.040. Epub 2012 Oct 27.
- Jewett BA, Collis DK. High complication rate with anterior total hip arthroplasties on a fracture table. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb;469(2):503-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1568-1.
- Christensen CP, Karthikeyan T, Jacobs CA. Greater prevalence of wound complications requiring reoperation with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep;29(9):1839-41. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.036. Epub 2014 May 2.
- Jahng KH, Bas MA, Rodriguez JA, Cooper HJ. Risk Factors for Wound Complications After Direct Anterior Approach Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Nov;31(11):2583-2587. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.04.030. Epub 2016 May 6.
- Pulido L, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Jul;466(7):1710-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0209-4. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
- Peel TN, Dowsey MM, Daffy JR, Stanley PA, Choong PF, Buising KL. Risk factors for prosthetic hip and knee infections according to arthroplasty site. J Hosp Infect. 2011 Oct;79(2):129-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
- Rasouli MR, Restrepo C, Maltenfort MG, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. Risk factors for surgical site infection following total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Sep 17;96(18):e158. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01363.
- Cooper HJ, Bas MA. Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy Versus Antimicrobial Dressings After Revision Hip and Knee Surgery: A Comparative Study. J Arthroplasty. 2016 May;31(5):1047-52. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.11.010. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AAAR5849
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Wound Complication
-
Indus Hospital and Health NetworkCompletedWound Closure After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison of Polypropylene and Polyglactin 910 Suture.Wound Heal | Wound Complication | Wound DehiscencePakistan
-
Royal North Shore HospitalUnknown
-
Marmara UniversityCompletedWound Healing Complication
-
Chulalongkorn UniversityUnknownWound Heal | Wound Surgical | Donor Site ComplicationThailand
-
Silver Falls DermatologySamaritan Health ServicesUnknownSurgery | Wound | Suture, Complication | Wound Complication | Wound of Skin | Suture; Complications, Infection or Inflammation | Wound DehiscenceUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompletedWound Infection | Wound ComplicationUnited States
-
St James Connolly Memorial HospitalUnknownWound Infection | Wound ComplicationIreland
-
Rothman Institute OrthopaedicsEnrolling by invitation
-
Scripps HealthNorth Park PodiatryNot yet recruitingAmputation | Wound; Foot | Wound Complication
-
Hung Vuong HospitalCompleted
Clinical Trials on Prevena
-
University of Calgary3MCompletedCoronary Artery Disease | Wound Complication | Complication of Coronary Artery Bypass GraftCanada
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillKinetic Concepts, Inc.TerminatedComplications; Arthroplasty, Infection or Inflammation | Wound ComplicationUnited States
-
State University of New York at Buffalo3MCompleted
-
St. James's Hospital, IrelandNot yet recruitingIleostomy - Stoma | Colostomy Stoma | Stoma Site InfectionIreland
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceUnknownMelanoma | Skin Cancer | Neuroendocrine Carcinoma | Lymph Node Metastases | Epidermoid CarcinomaFrance
-
The Cleveland Clinic3MCompletedJoint Diseases | Musculoskeletal Diseases | Prosthesis-related Infections | Wound ComplicationsUnited States
-
Centre Leon BerardRecruiting
-
3MRecruitingAbdominal Surgery | Orthopedic Surgery | Vascular Surgery | Cardiovascular SurgeryUnited States
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkRecruitingSarcoma | Neoplasms, Connective and Soft Tissue | CancerDenmark
-
Karolinska University HospitalStockholm South General HospitalRecruitingPostoperative Surgical Site InfectionSweden