More Than a Movement Disorder: Applying Palliative Care to Parkinson's Disease (MTMD)

May 12, 2021 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver
This is a two-center (University of Colorado, University of California San Francisco) community-based comparative effectiveness study of outpatient palliative care for Parkinson's disease (PD) and related disorders (progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), multiple systems atrophy (MSA), Lewy Body Dementia (LBD). In September 2018, the study was amended to also include Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related disorders (Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD), Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA), Vascular Dementia). It will utilize a randomized stepped-wedge design to compare patient and caregiver outcomes between usual care in the community versus usual care augmented by palliative training and telemedicine support to provide other resources (e.g. social work).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative illness affecting approximately 1.5 million Americans and is the 14th leading cause of death in the United States. PD is traditionally described as a movement disorder with characteristic motor symptoms (e.g. tremor). However, more recent research demonstrates the impact of nonmotor symptoms such as pain, depression, and dementia on mortality, quality of life (QOL), nursing home placement and caregiver distress. Regarding models of care for PD, evidence suggests that care including a neurologist results in lower mortality and nursing home placement than care solely from a primary care physician. Unfortunately, there is also significant evidence that many of the needs most important to PD patients and their caregivers (e.g. depression, planning for the future) are poorly addressed under current models of care. Palliative care is an approach to caring for individuals with life-threatening illnesses that focuses on addressing potential causes of suffering including physical and psychiatric symptoms, psychosocial issues and spiritual needs. While developed for cancer patients, palliative care approaches have been successfully applied in other chronic progressive illnesses including heart failure and pulmonary disease. To date there have been minimal attempts to apply these principles to PD although evidence suggests that PD patients' unmet needs under current models of care may be amenable to palliative care. A small but growing cadre of centers offer outpatient palliative care for PD with early evidence of efficacy and a randomized trial of an academic-based outpatient palliative care is underway led by investigators on this proposal. While this work is critical to forwarding this field, further work is needed to provide a model that can be widely disseminated. The current proposal addresses this gap by assessing the effectiveness and feasibility of a novel community-based intervention that empowers community neurology practices to improve care for PD patients and caregivers through palliative care training, coaching and telemedicine resources. The investigators hypothesize that this intervention will improve patient QOL and caregiver burden and will prove feasible and acceptable to community providers. The investigators Specific Aims are to: 1) Determine the a) effectiveness and b) feasibility of a novel community-based outpatient palliative care intervention for PD.; 2) Describe the effects of a this intervention on patient and caregiver costs and service utilization; and 3) Identify opportunities to optimize community-based palliative care for this population by: a) describing patient and caregiver characteristics associated with intervention benefits; and b) through direct patient, caregiver and provider interviews. Innovations of the investigators approach include a novel model of providing disease-specific community-based palliative care not dependent on limited palliative specialist resources, a stepped-wedge trial design and use of telemedicine resources to provide multidisciplinary care. The research is significant because it will create a foundation for future community-based dissemination studies in PD and the broader field of palliative care.

In September 2018, supplemental support from NIH was granted in order to explore outcomes among an Alzheimer's dementia population. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative illness affecting 10% of adults over age 65. This incurable and relentlessly progressive disease affects approximately 1.5 million Americans and is the 6th leading cause of death in the United States. Care for community-dwelling patients with AD is typically focused on the assessment and pharmacologic management of cognitive and behavioral symptoms, although there is growing recognition of the need to expand care to address other issues, including advance care planning. There is significant evidence that many of the most important needs of the AD patients and their caregivers are poorly addressed under current models of care, including management of medical and psychiatric symptoms (e.g. pain and depression), caregiver support, advance care planning, and spiritual wellbeing. Importantly, while the top goal of care for the majority of patients is avoidance of institutionalization, our current models of care invest more resources in institutionalized patients rather than proactively supporting community-dwelling individuals which may prevent institutionalization and reduce overall healthcare costs. Our supplemental study will thus additionally target this population for a 12-month period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

783

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • University of California, San Francisco
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Denver

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 105 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must be fluent English Speakers,
  • Must be over age 18,
  • They must meet United Kingdom (UK) Brain Bank criteria for probable PD, or
  • They must meet standard criteria for

    • progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP),
    • corticobasal degeneration (CBD),
    • multiple systems atrophy (MSA),
    • vascular parkinsonism, or
    • Lewy Body Dementia (LBD)
    • Alzheimer's dementia (AD)
    • Primary progressive aphasia
    • Vascular dementia.
  • Patients must be at high risk for poor outcomes as defined by the Brief Needs Assessment Tool (BNAT) which screens for psychosocial issues, symptoms, and caregiver burden.
  • Caregivers will be identified by asking the patient: "Could (participant) tell us the one person who helps (participant) the most with (participant's) PD outside of clinic?"
  • Caregivers may be self-identified in cases of severe dementia in order to obtain data relevant to this vulnerable and underrepresented group.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable or unwilling to commit to study procedures;
  • Presence of additional chronic medical illnesses which may require palliative services (e.g. metastatic cancer); or
  • Already receiving palliative care or hospice services.
  • Not expecting to continue care with enrolled physician for at least 6 months.

The investigators have purposefully kept our inclusion/exclusion criteria broad to allow for greater generalizability of results and to ensure inclusion of potentially underrepresented and understudied subgroups.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard of Care
Patients to get usual care from their established neurology care team that is enrolled in the study.
Experimental: Standard of Care plus Palliative Care
Patients to get usual care, augmented by palliative care, provided by their established neurology care team that is affiliated with the study, with additional support provided by the University of Colorado Denver Neurology Palliative Care team.
Palliative care training for community neurologists and use of telemedicine for team-based support of patients
Other Names:
  • Supportive Care
Experimental: Clinicians
Clinicians enrolled in the study will receive an 8-hour supportive and palliative care training, followed by monthly coaching and the availability of telemedicine visits for enrolled patients with the university neuro-palliative care team. The unit of randomization is the time when they receive training. Four to five clinical practices will receive training every 6 months during years 2 and 3, at which time all of their enrolled patients will be switched from usual care to the intervention arm.
Palliative care training for community neurologists and use of telemedicine for team-based support of patients
Other Names:
  • Supportive Care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life Alzheimer's Disease (QOL-AD)
Time Frame: Up to 48 months
Measures of Quality of Life
Up to 48 months
Zarit Burden of Care Instrument (ZBI)
Time Frame: Up to 48 months
Measures of Care Partner Distress
Up to 48 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQOL)
Time Frame: Up to 48 months
Measures of Quality of Life
Up to 48 months
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: Up to 48 months
Measures of mood
Up to 48 months
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS_PD)
Time Frame: Up to 48 months
Measures of symptom burden
Up to 48 months
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Wellbeing (FACIT-SP 12 Item)
Time Frame: Up to 48 months
Measures of spiritual wellbeing
Up to 48 months
Prolonged Grief Questionnaire (PG-12)
Time Frame: Up to 48 months
Measures of grief (sense of loss)
Up to 48 months
Semi-structured Qualitative Interview
Time Frame: At 12 months
Measures of participant views on the study including their outcomes and the implementation of this model of community-based palliative care.
At 12 months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)
Time Frame: At baseline
Measures of cognitive function
At baseline
Healthcare Utilization Form
Time Frame: Up to 48 months
Measures of type and frequency of healthcare utilized
Up to 48 months
Palliative Performance Scale
Time Frame: Up to 48 months
Measures of Disease Severity
Up to 48 months
Clinical Global Impression of Change
Time Frame: Up to 48 months
Measures of change in disease burden
Up to 48 months
Treatment Documentation Form
Time Frame: Up to 48 months
Measures of treatments used for disease management
Up to 48 months
Modified Caregiver Strain Index
Time Frame: Up to 48 months
Measures of care partner distress
Up to 48 months
Needs at End of Life Screening Tool
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Detects and measures needs for end of life
Up to 12 months
Neuropsychiatric Inventory
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Measures dementia-related symptoms
Up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Benzi M Kluger, MD, MS, University of Colorado, Denver

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Palliative Care

Subscribe