Sleep as a Model to Understand and Manipulate Cortical Activity in Order to Promote Functional Recovery After Stroke (SSS)

April 30, 2021 updated by: University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

Sleep as a Model to Understand and Manipulate Cortical Activity in Order to Promote Neuroplasticity and Functional Recovery After Stroke

Brain functions are supported by multiple cell types, including neuronal and non-neuronal cells that are connected into complex networks. When the connectivity between those cells is altered or disrupted, the functioning of the brain is impaired. In stroke, the interruption of blood supply to the neural circuits results in connectivity damage and permanent disabilities. Experimental evidence suggests that some types of brain state, including sleep, can protect brain tissue from stroke and "repair" the damaged circuits. This project will investigate the neuronal mechanism underlying the protective effect of sleep on brain connectivity and network activity. To this end, the investigators will use a collection of state-of-the-art technologies including high-density electroencephalography (hd-EEG), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Perspectives include a better understanding of the causes and consequences of the perturbed electrical activity of the brain during sleep in stroke patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berne, Switzerland, 3010
        • Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent as documented by signature
  • Age between 18 and 80 years
  • First-ever right-sided stroke
  • Normal or corrected to normal vision
  • Demonstration of left hemispatial neglect (after a right-hemispheric brain lesion) found in a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery and clinical assessment
  • At least 3 weeks post-stroke

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant neurodegenerative diseases
  • Psychiatric diseases
  • Decompressive craniectomy
  • History of documented sleep disorders in the medical record (e.g. insomnia, hypersomnia, rem-sleep behaviour disorder)
  • Epileptic seizures
  • Implanted medical devices (e.g.: pacemakers, cochlear implants, implanted neurostimulators)
  • Presence of metal in the region of the head (excluding fixed dental implants such as tooth fillings or fixed dental braces)
  • Medication with drugs possibly lowering the seizure threshold
  • Alcohol or drug abuse
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study
  • For female patients: in order to participate in the study, female patients in reproductive age need to take a pregnancy test (a standard urine pregnancy test will be provided).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: TMS
Real transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
The investigators recently showed that the repeated application of the so-called continuous theta burst protocol (cTBS) over the contralesional hemisphere resulted in a long-standing improvement of visual hemineglect (Cazzoli et al., 2012). The cTBS protocol was developed by Huang et al. (Huang et al., 2005) and modified by the investigators' group (Nyffeler et al., 2006). TBS protocol consists of a burst of 3 pulses at a frequency of 30 Hz, repeated at 6 Hz. One continuous train includes 801 pulses, the duration of one cTBS train is 44 seconds.
SHAM_COMPARATOR: sham TMS
Sham transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a comparison.
Sham coil will be used to exclude possible nonspecific effects of the TMS. The sham coil is shielded i.e., the magnetic field output is weakened and therefore insufficiently powerful to stimulate the cortex.
EXPERIMENTAL: TMS and tACS
Real transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and real transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS).
The investigators recently showed that the repeated application of the so-called continuous theta burst protocol (cTBS) over the contralesional hemisphere resulted in a long-standing improvement of visual hemineglect (Cazzoli et al., 2012). The cTBS protocol was developed by Huang et al. (Huang et al., 2005) and modified by the investigators' group (Nyffeler et al., 2006). TBS protocol consists of a burst of 3 pulses at a frequency of 30 Hz, repeated at 6 Hz. One continuous train includes 801 pulses, the duration of one cTBS train is 44 seconds.
TACS stimulation involves two electrodes placed on either side of the desired site of cortical stimulation. The mode of stimulation used in this experiment is identical to previous studies using tACS in sleep ( Marshall et al., 2006; Prehn-Kristensen et al., 2014 ). Stimulation follows a sinusoidal pattern from 0 to 260 μA. This pattern is delivered at 0.75 Hz and is repeated for 225 cycles; a total of 5 minutes of stimulation. This 5 minute pattern is again repeated 5 times, with a minute of no stimulation between each; thus for a total of 30 minutes.
SHAM_COMPARATOR: TMS and sham tACS
Real transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and sham transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) as a comparison.
The investigators recently showed that the repeated application of the so-called continuous theta burst protocol (cTBS) over the contralesional hemisphere resulted in a long-standing improvement of visual hemineglect (Cazzoli et al., 2012). The cTBS protocol was developed by Huang et al. (Huang et al., 2005) and modified by the investigators' group (Nyffeler et al., 2006). TBS protocol consists of a burst of 3 pulses at a frequency of 30 Hz, repeated at 6 Hz. One continuous train includes 801 pulses, the duration of one cTBS train is 44 seconds.
Sham stimulation will be used to exclude possible nonspecific effects of the tACS. Sham tACS stimulation will involve actual stimulation for the first 30 seconds of the ramp-up period (stimulation power is gradually increased until its final level), and then immediately gradually decreased until zero (without the intermediate 4 minutes of actual stimulation). This procedure will be repeated 5 times every 6 minutes and shall induce similar cutaneous sensations as real stimulation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in visual exploration and sleep parameters and the effect of cTBS
Time Frame: Day 3
Relationship of visual exploration (mean cumulative fixation duration) to sleep parameters (slow wave activity and spindles) from the baseline to post-cTBS sleep.
Day 3
Change from baseline in the effect of tACS on visual exploration
Time Frame: Day 2
Group comparison of visual exploration task (mean cumulative fixation duration) between real and sham tACS.
Day 2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The effect of cTBS on sleep
Time Frame: Day 1 to 3
Relationship between baseline sleep parameters (slow wave activity and spindles) and effectiveness of cTBS.
Day 1 to 3
The effect of tACS on sleep
Time Frame: Day 1 to 2
Change in sleep architecture (REM and NREM sleep) between tACS and sham stimulation.
Day 1 to 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Claudio L. Bassetti, Prof. Dr. med., Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 2, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016-01387

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemispatial Neglect

Clinical Trials on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)

Subscribe