Long-term Consequences of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in the Newborn Period

December 4, 2018 updated by: Gorm Greisen

Long-term Consequences of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in the Newborn Period: Follow-up at School Age, a Case-control Study

Aim

The aim of this study is to determine consequences at school age of the diagnosis of NEC in the neonatal period.

Methods

This is a case-control study, with case-group being children born in Denmark with a history of NEC and control-group being age-, gestational age- and year of birth matched children born in Denmark with no history of NEC.

Primary outcome

Abnormal or borderline 'total difficulties score' in the strenghts-and-difficulties-questionnaire as assessed by parents.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Rationale

Knowledge of the long-term complications related to necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in the neonatal period is essential, when clinicians are counseling parents about the risk for complications following NEC. When deciding upon a follow-up strategy for the infant after discharge, this knowledge is also crucial. If the infant has an increased risk for complications later in life, a closer follow up is important to assure proper handling of complications.

So far, a definite conclusion regarding long-term complications of NEC has not been made. A systematic review including ten studies, have shown a significantly increased risk for neurodevelopmental impairment in NEC children. However, the median follow-up time did not exceed two years and may not reflect the true long-term complications. The ORACLE Children Study investigated neurodevelopmental impairments in children with a history of NEC at 7,5 year follow-up and found no increased risk.

No review has been published regarding growth impairments and so far, available studies have a less than three year follow-up period and are reporting conflicting results.

Gastrointestinal morbidities are even less investigated and reports no association with NEC within three years follow-up. However, the ORACLE Children Study found increased risk of bowel problems at 7,5 years follow-up in children with a history of NEC.

The Oracle Children Study and Roze et al reported behavioural problems in up to 30% of children with a history of NEC at school age, but no statistic significance was found when compared to a control-group.

Further studies investigating the outcome of NEC-children at school age are needed.

Objectives

The investigators plan to conduct a retrospective parental-questionnare study, to determine the long-term complications related to the diagnosis of NEC at school age (5-15 years of age).

Methods

This is a case-control study. Case-group will include all surviving children born in Denmark between 1st of January 2002 and 31st of December 2011 with an international classification of diseases (ICD-10) diagnosis of NEC at discharge. Matching each child with a history of NEC to two children with no history of NEC by gestational age, year of birth and birthweight will form the control group. Matching criteria's have been chosen to balance prematurity and age at follow-up between case and control-group. Parental follow-up questionnaires regarding complications will be sent to all parents of cases and controls.

Clinical data on the children, regarding birth and neonatal history, will be obtained and used in a mixed regression model to adjust for possible confounders.

Primary outcome

Abnormal or borderline 'total difficulties score' in the strenghts-and-difficulties-questionnaire as assessed by parents.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Severe cerebral palsy (GMFCS III-IV)
  2. Head circumference as measured by parents
  3. Height as measured by parents
  4. Abdominal symptoms resulting in significant absence from school as reported by parents
  5. Diarrhoea within the last six months
  6. Constipation within the last six months

Power calculation

The sample size for the case group was estimated to include 200 children with NEC (after a no-response drop out of 20%) and in the control group 300 children without NEC, with a 1:2 match ratio and the assumption that the response rate will be lower in the control group., i.e. 250 parents of children with NEC and 500 parents of control children will be contacted.

SDQ total score Assuming 30% prevalence of abnormal or borderline scores for 'total difficulties' in the strength-and-difficulties-questionnaire in NEC-survivors, compared to an assumed 20% in controls (19), this study will detect the difference with a power of 72% at a 5% significance level.

Severe cerebral palsy (GMFCS score III-V) Assuming a 20% prevalence (9) of severe cerebral palsy in NEC-survivors compared to an assumed 10% in controls (22) this study will detect the difference with a power of 87% at a 5% significance level.

Head circumference The power calculation on our cohort shows that we, at a 5% significance level, can detect the difference in mean head circumference at 0.3 standard-deviations or more, with a power of 90%.

Analysis plan

Primary outcome: a p-value < 0.05 will be considered significant. To determine a difference in SDQ-scores between case- and control group, Chi-squared test or Fischer's Exact test will be used as appropriate.

Secondary outcome: a p-value < 0.01 will be considered significant. Differences in 'height', 'head circumference' and 'absence from school due to abdominal symptoms' will be investigated by t-test or Mann-Whitney's test as appropriate. 'Severe cerebral palsy', 'diarrhoea' and 'constipation' will be analyzed by Chi-squared test or Fischer´s Exact test as appropriate.

At first, an unadjusted analysis will be performed to investigate differences in primary and secondary outcome. Secondly, a mixed regression model will be used to adjust for possible confounders

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Department of Neonatology, Rigshospitalet
    • Capital Region
      • Copenhagen, Capital Region, Denmark, 2100
        • Neonatalklinikken, Rigshospitalet

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 13 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Case-group will include all surviving children born in Denmark between 1st of January 2002 and 31st of December 2011 with an ICD-10 diagnosis of NEC (DP77.9) at discharge.

Matching each child with a history of NEC to two children with no history of NEC by gestational age, year of birth and birthweight will form the control group. Matching criteria's have been chosen to balance prematurity and age at follow-up between case and control-group.

Description

Inclusion Criteria case-group:

  • Born from 1st of January 2002 to 31st of December 2011
  • ICD-10 diagnosis of NEC (DP77.9)
  • Survival at follow-up
  • Response to questionnaire

Inclusion Criteria control-group:

  • Born from 1st of January 2002 to 31st of December 2011
  • Matched by year of birth, birthweight and gestational age to children in case-group
  • Survival at follow-up
  • Response to questionnaire

Exclusion Criteria

  • Death before follow-up
  • Non-responders to questionnaire

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Case
Children with a history of necrotizing enterocolitis
control
Children with no history of necrotizing enterocolitis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavioral impairments
Time Frame: 6-15 years
Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Behavioral impairment (yes/no) is defined if the child has an abnormal or borderline score for the 'total difficulties score'.
6-15 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cerebral palsy
Time Frame: 5-15 years
We will dichotomize between non/mild cerebral palsy defined as lower score than III in the Gross Motor Function Classification System and moderate/severe cerebral palsy defined as scoring III or higher.
5-15 years
Height
Time Frame: 5-15 years
Height in cm as measured by parents. 'low height-for-age' defined as height in cm less than - 2 standard deviations.
5-15 years
Head circumference
Time Frame: 5-15 years
Head circumference in cm as measured by parents.
5-15 years
Absence from school due to abdominal symptoms
Time Frame: 5-15 years
Defined as number of days within the last six months, where the child has stayed home from school due to abdominal symptoms including pain, diarrhea, constipation, frequent bowel movements etc.
5-15 years
Constipation
Time Frame: 5-15 years
Defined as wether or not the child, within the last six months, have had stools scoring 1 or 2 on the Bristol Stool Scale.
5-15 years
Diarrhoea
Time Frame: 5-15 years
Defined as wether or not the child, within the last six months, have had stools scoring 5-7 on the Bristol Stool Scale.
5-15 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gorm Greisen, Professor, MD, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 5, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Complications

3
Subscribe