A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Non-ischemic to Ischemic Preservation in Adult Cardiac Transplantation (NIHP)

April 26, 2021 updated by: Johan Nilsson, MD, PhD, Region Skane

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Non-ischemic Hypothermic Cardioplegic Perfusion to Ischemic Cold Static Preservation of Donor Hearts in Adult Cardiac Transplantation

The overall aim of this proposal is to compare a new state-of-the-art ex-vivo organ preservation method with standard ischemic cold static storage of donor hearts in adult cardiac transplantation.

Standard heart preservation before transplantation consists of cold ischemic storage of the heart. Clinical studies has shown that the morbidity and mortality risk increases with extension of the allograft ischemic time over four hours. For each additional hour the mortality risk increase with 25% the first year. This time constrained is costly and results in severe logistical problems, leading to loss of transplantable organs.

Initially the study is prospective, single-institution, open-label, non-randomised trial comparing the NIHP method with the conventionally SCS in adult heart transplanted patients at Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. Six patients will be transplanted using the non-ischemic hypothermic cardioplegic perfusion. These will be compared with contemporary control patients transplanted with standard ischemic cold static storage. The results will be analysed and reported.

After the initially six patients have been completed, the study will become a single center, prospective, open, blinded endpoint, randomized, controlled clinical trial including 34 patients.

The primary end-point is a composite of mortality, primary graft dysfunction (PGD), need for extra corporal support, or acute cellular rejection (ACR) within 30- days post-transplant. PGD and ACR will be accessed blinded.An improved preservation of the transplanted organ will reduce the major limitations for survival in the early post-transplant period such as non-specific graft failure and acute rejection. Furthermore, it will make it possible to increase the donor pool.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

SURVEY OF THE FIELD

Ischemia and reperfusion (I/R)-elicited tissue injury contributes to morbidity and mortality4. In organ transplantation, it is a major challenge. The imbalance in metabolic supply and demand within the ischemic organ results in tissue hypoxia and microvascular dysfunction4. The following reperfusion enhances the activation of innate and adaptive immune responses resulting in a cell death programs4,5. Furthermore, it has been report that miRNA expression profile for heart transplantation is associated with I/R injury. Standard heart preservation before transplantation consists of cold ischemic storage of the heart. Clinical studies have shown that the mortality risk increases sharply with extension of the allograft ischemic time over 4 hours. For each additional hour, the mortality risk increase with 25% the first year. Different myocardial cardioplegic preservation solutions and an ex-vivo perfusion machine have been developed. That technique includes use of whole blood from deceased donor and a normothermic beating heart consuming nutrients during the preservation. Despite some promising experimental results, no consistent differences in outcome have been found. Improved preservation of the endothelium of the coronary arteries is instrumental to achieve improved patient short and long term outcome. A damaged endothelium could result in cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and increases the risk of ACR. Therefore, prolonged time and improved storage of the donor heart would save lives.

PURPOSE AND AIM

The overall aim of this study is to compare a new state-of-the-art organ preservation technique, non-ischemic continous/intermittent hypothermic cardioplegic perfusion (NICHCP), on immediate and long term heart allograft function and rejection episodes, with standard ischemic cold static storage (ICSS) of donor hearts in adult cardiac transplantation.

A new ex-vivo heart perfusion technique where the heart is perfused during explantation, using an independent portable heart-lung-machine, has been developed by Prof. Steen's research group3. Pre-clinical studies have shown that the new technology using NICHCP of donor hearts can be safely applied for 24 hours in pigs, however this new perfusion technique has never been used on man.

The primary hypothesis is that the NICHCP is superior to ischemic cold static storage of donor hearts. The primary end-point is a composite of mortality, primary graft dysfunction, need for extra corporal mechanical support, or Acute Cellular Rejection (ACR) ≥ grade 2 within 30-days.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The study will investigate the superiority of the new methodology (NICHCP) in terms of improved immediate and prolonged organ function. More specifically, it is hypothesized that the weaning period of cardio-pulmonary bypass, will be shorter, the need for inotropic support reduced, and the major limitations for survival in the early post-transplant period such as non-specific graft failure, multiorgan failure, ACR, and infection will decrease. Furthermore, in the late post-transplant period, it is hypothesized that the development of CAV and immunosuppressive side effects, such as malignancy, will be reduced.

WORK PLAN

In the initial phase, it is excepted that 1 - 2 patients will be enrolled per month. During the randomized part of the study It is expected to enroll 1 - 4 patients per month. With that pace, the study is completed within about 24 months. The patient short term follow-up is 30 days and long term follow up is 12 months. For short-term-analysis purpose the study is considered completed as the last patient of the study has passed 30-days post-surgery. The long-term study will continue to monitor the patients for 12 months. Adverse events will be recorded even if occurring after completion of the study and all patients will be followed throughout life according to standard clinical care.

If this is successful, this will be introduced as standard among other national and international collaborators. The investigators estimate that this technique will be the golden standard within 5 years.

STUDY DESIGN

Initially the study is a prospective, single-institution, open-label, non-randomised trial. Here, six patients will be transplanted with the NICHCP method. These will be compared with contemporary control patients transplanted with standard ICSS. An interim assessment will be performed when these six patients has passed 180-days post-transplant. The results from this study will be analysed and published. A report will be sent to the Ethical review bord for an approval to continue with the second part of the study.

After six patients have been transplanted with the NICHCP method and a new approval has been achieved from the local ethical board, the study will become a single center, prospective, open, blinded endpoint, randomized, controlled clinical trial. The continued study will comprise 17 patients in the test group and 17 control patients. The main outcomes will be reported on intention to treat basis. PGD and ACR assessment will be performed by a blinded access. Listed heart recipients (aged >18 years) at Skåne University Hospital will be screened. Patients who full-fill all inclusion and no exclusion criteria will be included after they signed the informed consent form. In the initial phase, it is excepted that 1-2 patients will be enrolled per month. During the randomized part of the study it is expected to enroll 1-4 patients per month. With that pace, the study is completed within 24 months. The patient short term follow-up is 30 days and long term follow up is 12 months. For short-term-analysis purpose the study is considered completed as the last patient of the study has passed 30-days post-surgery. The long-term study will continue to monitor the patients for 12 months. Adverse events will be recorded even if occurring after completion of the study and all patients will be followed throughout life according to standard clinical care.

STATISTICAL ANALYS PLAN

Descriptive statistics will be presented as means, standard deviations, medians and inter quartile ranges for the continuous variables and as counts and percent for categorical variables. An alpha level of 5% will be used for all analyses, unless otherwise stated. Demographics will be tabulated overall and by treatment group. The results from the laboratory analysis will be calculated based on continuous variables. All data analyses will be performed on data available. After three of the patients have been enrolled a safety assessment will be performed. An interim assessment of the initial six patients in the test group will be performed when all six patients has passed 30-days post-transplant or expired. A protocol deviation is any event where investigator or study personnel did not conduct the study per the protocol or applicable laws. All deviations will be reported to the Principal Investigator (regardless of cause or prior approval) and will be noted on the eCRF form.

CLINICAL AND SCIENTIFIC IMPLICATIONS

The use of an ex-vivo machine for the preservation of a donor heart requires more resources than the technology used today, such as special equipment, suitable transportation and bank blood to prime the perfusion module. Compared with cold static techniques for preservation, this will initially be costly. However, this must be weighed against the value of more donor hearts become available for transplant and cost savings in the form of shorter time to perform the surgery, reduced incidence of the primary graft dysfunction (PGD), less need for expensive mechanical cardiac support post-transplant, shortened hospitalization and longer-term risk reduction of chronic rejection. The costs of complications directly connected to the transplant is cost driven, especially if the recipient develops PGD requiring mechanical circulatory support with a prolonged ICU stay. Furthermore, in the future the transplantation can be scheduled to day-time surgery and complexed high risk cases can be done with the highest competence available without time limitation. An improved preservation of the transplanted organ will reduce the major limitations for survival in the early post-transplant period such as PGD. Furthermore, it will make it possible to increase the donor pool. Theoretically in the nordic countries, this would enable international organ sharing with Europe and the eastern United States. This expansion of the donor pool is one of the main potential benefits of this device.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

47

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Skane
      • Lund, Skane, Sweden, 22185
        • Skane University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Listed for heart transplantation
  • Signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous solid organ or bone marrow transplantation
  • 4 or more previous sternotomies
  • known malignancy
  • kidney failure (estimated creatinine clearness, GFR <30)
  • liver failure (ASAT, ALAT or total Bilirubin) > 5 times upper limit of normal, or INR >2.0,
  • ongoing septicemia
  • systemic inflammatory disorders treated with corticosteroids
  • not able to understand Swedish

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Non-ischemic preservation.
Non-ischemic hypothermic perfusion (NIHP): The device, a portable heart-lung machine, is continous/intermittent perfused the heart with a new preservation solution at a temperature of 8°C.
The device is a portable heart-lung machine; an automatic pressure and flow-controlled perfusion system. The heart is submerged in a solution and the medium is circulated in the heart, at a temperature of 8°C.
Other: Standard ischemic storage.
Ischemic cold static storage: a crystalloid solution (cardioplegia) is used to stop and preserve the heart. The heart is storage i a transport box containing ice to keep the temperature around 8°C.
Standard ischemic cold static storage; a crystalloid solution (cardioplegia) is used to stop and preserve the heart. Cardioplegia is given. The heart is storage i a transport box containing ice to keep the temperature around 8°C.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short-term graft failure
Time Frame: Within 30-days post-transplantation

The Primary End-Point is defined as a composite endpoint of patient death due to graft failure, re-transplantation due to graft failure, severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD), need for extra corporal mechanical support such as ECMO within 7 days post transplantation, or acute cellular rejection (ACR) ≥ grade 2.

PGD grading is done according to the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines. ACR assessment is based on post-transplant myocardial biopsy information and standard clinical evaluation.

Within 30-days post-transplantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Long-term graft failure
Time Frame: Within 12-months post-transplantation

Secondary End-Points is defined as a time to the composite endpoint defined as: severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD), need for extra corporal mechanical support such as ECMO, acute cellular rejection (ACR) ≥ grade 2, or CAV.

CAV assessment is based on information from the angiography and registered according to the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines guidelines. ACR assessment is based on post-transplant myocardial biopsy information and standard clinical evaluation.

Within 12-months post-transplantation
Ischemia and reperfusion injury
Time Frame: Within 30-days post-transplantation
CK-MB are measured from blood samples that are collected from the sinus coronaries after finalized preservation, and from blood-samples 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after release of x-clamp.
Within 30-days post-transplantation
Ischemia and reperfusion injury
Time Frame: Within 30-days post-transplantation
cTnl are measured from blood samples that are collected from the sinus coronaries after finalized preservation, and from blood-samples 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after release of x-clamp.
Within 30-days post-transplantation

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative renal function
Time Frame: Within 30-days post-transplantation
The renal function is analyzed based on s-Creatinine levels, need for dialysis (days).
Within 30-days post-transplantation
Postoperative liver function
Time Frame: Within 30-days post-transplantation
The liver function is measured with ASAT and ALAT.
Within 30-days post-transplantation
Length of Stay
Time Frame: Within 12-months post-transplantation
Intensive Care Unit (ICU): Calculated from time patient arrives into the ICU until the patient is discharged from the ICU. Hospital: Calculated from date and time of surgery until date and time that the patient is discharged from the hospital.
Within 12-months post-transplantation
EQ-5D
Time Frame: Within 12-months post-transplantation
The EuroQol (EQ-5D) is an instrument used to assess the current health status of patients. It consists of five domains and one visual analogue scale. This instrument assesses morbidity, self-care, usual activity, pain, and anxiety and depression of patients. The EQ-5D will be completed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months visits.
Within 12-months post-transplantation
Immediate Cardiac function - weaning time
Time Frame: Within 2-days post-transplantation
The immediate organ function is determined as the time for weaning off cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) measured in minutes.
Within 2-days post-transplantation
Organ graft dysfunction due to rejection
Time Frame: Within 12-months post-transplantation
Patient death due to graft failure, re-transplantation or sign of graft rejection (ACR ≥ grade 1, AMR ≥1 or CAV) after transplantation. ACR assessment is based on post-transplant myocardial biopsy information and standard clinical evaluation
Within 12-months post-transplantation
Organ preservation injury
Time Frame: Within 1-days post-transplantation
Measure of IL-1, IL-6, TNF, micro-RNAs in tissue samples taken from the donor heart
Within 1-days post-transplantation
Immediate Cardiac function - inotropic support score
Time Frame: Within 48-hours post transplantation
Summarize of inotropic support according to the definition in the PGD grading, International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines.
Within 48-hours post transplantation
Respiratory dysfunction
Time Frame: Within 7 days post-transplantation
Need for re-intubation or time on ventilator > 48 hours
Within 7 days post-transplantation
Organ rejection
Time Frame: Within 12-months post-transplantation
Measure of donor specific cell free DNA each month post transplantation
Within 12-months post-transplantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Johan Nilsson, MD, PhD, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Transplant; Failure, Heart

Clinical Trials on Non-ischemic preservation

3
Subscribe