Effectiveness of Digital Capacitive Diathermy Versus Ultrasound on Myofascial Trigger Points

May 2, 2018 updated by: Universidad San Jorge

The main objective:

To compare the effect on muscle tone between the application of digital capacitive diathermy and the application of ultrasound on the myofascial trigger points (MTP) of the upper trapezius muscle.

Hypothesis:

The application of digital capacitive diathermy on myofascial trigger points of the trapezius muscle compared to the application of ultrasound produces objective changes in muscle tone, and this change is superior to the changes generated by the US.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

It is a simple-blinded randomized crossover clinical trial where volunteer subjects, older than 18 years, have a latent or active proximal MTP1 (intermediate part of the anterior margin of the upper part of the muscle near the vertical fibers of the muscle attached to clavicle) in the upper trapezius.

It will assess if there are changes in the muscle tone of the trapezius muscle after applying digital capacitive diathermy (DCD) or ultrasound (US) in the latent or active MTP1 of the trapezius muscle in healthy adults.

Each patient will receive a single session of each treatment in the affected trapezius. The order in which treatments are received - US followed by digital capacitive diathermy, or vice versa - is determined at random.

To remove any carryover of effects, there will be a week of washing period between the two interventions.

Intervention:

- DCD: The patient is positioned in prone position on stretcher. Firstly, it will apply almonds oil on the MTP1 of the upper trapezius affected. Then, it will put the "musculotendinous injury FAST" program which lasts 6 minutes; and, it will move the ultrasound applicator in contact with the skin with a velocity approximately between 2.5 and 4 centimeters per second.

- US: The patient is positioned in prone position on the stretcher. Firstly, it will select parameters (frequency: 1MHz, intensity: 1.0 W/cm2, mode: continuous). Then it will apply a slow technique of circular movements with a speed of approximately between 2.5 and 4 centimeters per second over the area of the MTP1 of the upper trapezius affected during 6 minutes.

Assessment:

To assess the effectiveness of these techniques, several tests will be performed on the subjects:

  • Myotonometric measurements using a myotonometer to obtain frequency, decrement (elasticity) and stiffness of the evaluated points and MTPs.
  • Algometry results will bring information of the PPT of evaluated MTPs.
  • The 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale results will bring information of the subjective dolor perception of the subjects.
  • Inclinometer results will bring information of the ROM of cervical spine lateral inclination.
  • The Neck Disability Index results will provide information on how much neck pain interferes in the daily activities of patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Villanueva de Gállego, Spain, 50830
        • Universidad San Jorge

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older than 18 years
  • Presence of an active or latent MTrP 1 in the upper trapezius:

    • Presence of taut band in a skeletal muscle.
    • Presence of a hypersensitive point in the taut band.
    • Local twitch response caused by palpation of the taut band.
    • Reproduction of the typical referred pain pattern of MTrPs in response to compression.
    • Spontaneous presence of the typical pain pattern and/or patient's recognition of that pain as familiar (criteria only applicable to the active MTrPs).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of neurological disorders (radiculopathy).
  • Cervical surgery.
  • Chronic pain in any part of the body as a result of a traumatic incident.
  • Chronic rheumatic disease.
  • Medical diagnosis of fibromyalgia.
  • Systemic diseases.
  • Actual pregnancy.
  • Clinical depression.
  • Body mass index ≥30.
  • To receive treatment of myofascial syndrome in the muscles of the cervico-dorsal area (physical therapy, invasive techniques ...) during the month prior to the beginning of the study.
  • Ingestion of medication (analgesics, muscle relaxants, psychotropic or anti-inflammatory agents) in the three days prior to the start of the study.

Exit criteria:

  • Patient´s petition.
  • Appearance of any lesion that might contraindicate the use of electrotherapy techniques.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: US Group
Ultrasound Therapy
Ultrasound equipment will be used, choosing a continuous mode, with a frequency of 1MHz and an intensity of 1.0 W/cm2. The technique will be applied during 6 minutes with circular movements and a speed of approximately between 2.5 and 4 centimeters per second.
Active Comparator: DCD Group
Digital Capacitive Diathermy Therapy
The DCD equipment will be used choosing the "musculotendinous injury FAST" program which lasts 6 minutes. The applicator will move with a velocity approximately between 2.5 and 4 centimeters per second.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Stiffness
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (30 minutes after intervention); Follow up (1 week after the intervention).
The muscle stiffness reflects muscle resistance to the force that changes its shape (Nm). This outcome measure is obtained by a device named MyotonPro®. It is a non-invasive commercial device made to calculate myotonometric properties of the muscle.
Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (30 minutes after intervention); Follow up (1 week after the intervention).
Change in Decrement (elasticity)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (30 minutes after intervention); Follow up (1 week after the intervention).
Logarithmic decrement of the dampening of muscle oscillations is an indicator of the elasticity. This outcome measure is obtained by a device named MyotonPro®. It is a non-invasive commercial device made to calculate myotonometric properties of the muscle.
Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (30 minutes after intervention); Follow up (1 week after the intervention).
Change in Frequency
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (30 minutes after intervention); Follow up (1 week after the intervention).

Frequency of muscle oscillations (Hz) is an indicator of the tone. This outcome measure is obtained by a device named MyotonPro®. It is a non-invasive commercial device made to calculate myotonometric properties of the muscle. The assessment is realized in these points:

  • MTrP 1 of the affected superior trapezius.
  • MTrP 3 of the affected superior trapezius.
  • MTrP 1 of the NO affected superior trapezius.
  • Point in the middle of the muscle belly of the affected superior trapezius. 10 mechanical stimuli of 0.4 N of force and 0.15 ms of duration will be applied. The MyotonPro® must remain perpendicular to the surface to be measured (the subject will be lying in a prone position for the MTrP 3, and sit down for the three other points). Each assessment will consist of 10 multiple measurements, spaced for 1 second. To be considerate as valid, the variation coefficient of the measure should not exceed 3%.
Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (30 minutes after intervention); Follow up (1 week after the intervention).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (30 minutes after intervention); Follow up (1 week after the intervention).

The PPT is measured using a pressure algometer in these points:

  • MTrP 1 of the affected superior trapezius.
  • MTrP 3 of the affected superior trapezius.
  • MTrP 1 of the NO affected superior trapezius.
  • MTrP 2 of the lateral gastrocnemius of the affected side. The subject will be lying in a prone position for more stability and with a pillow under his feet. The algometer must remain perpendicular to the surface to be measured. It will be measured three consecutive times, with an interval of 30 seconds between each measurement.
Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (30 minutes after intervention); Follow up (1 week after the intervention).
Change in the Range Of Motion (ROM) of cervical spine lateral inclination
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (30 minutes after intervention); Follow up (1 week after the intervention).
It will be used a portable inclinometer to assess the ROM of the contralateral active cervical spine inclination. The subject will be in a relaxed and comfortable sitting position, leaning on the backrest, arms resting on his knees and fixing a point with his eyes. It will be measured three consecutive times, with an interval of 30 seconds between each measurement.
Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (30 minutes after intervention); Follow up (1 week after the intervention).
Change in Pain Perception
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (30 minutes after intervention); Follow up (1 week after the intervention).
Change in pain perception using Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). The NPRS is a scale from 0-10 ("0" = no pain; "10" = the most intense pain imaginable).
Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (30 minutes after intervention); Follow up (1 week after the intervention).
Change in Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Follow up (1 week after the intervention).
The NDI consists of ten questions in the following domains: Pain Intensity, Personal Care, Lifting, Reading, Headaches, Concentration, Work, Driving, Sleeping, and Recreation.
Pre-intervention; Follow up (1 week after the intervention).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carolina Jiménez-Sánchez, MSc, Universidad San Jorge
  • Principal Investigator: Maria Ortiz-Lucas, PhD, Universidad San Jorge

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Muscle Tonus

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound Therapy

Subscribe