Simulation to Assess Cognitive Workload and Task Load IndeX (TLX) Performance

July 16, 2018 updated by: Lilot Marc, Claude Bernard University

The Influence of the Perceived Workload on Performance During High Fidelity Simulation in Surgical Specialty ( Including Anesthesia) and Nurses

High-fidelity simulation (HFS) is a learning method extensively used for training of surgical specialty (including anesthesia) and nurses. It has a beneficial effect on knowledge of algorithms, team working, early warning scores, and communication. Various skills can be learned using a standardized simulation programs.

The complexity of instructional design may produce cognitive overload, high stress level and anxiety. This may increase fatigue, facilitate errors, and is associated with inferior task performance which may impede memorization of learned skills resulting in inefficient learning/simulation failure. Subjectively reported scales can accurately identify the level of perceived workload and mental demand in individuals during simulation tasks. One example is the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)-TLX - the most accepted subjective measure of human workload in various industries including medicine.

Surgical specialty (including anesthesia) and nurses training curriculum in Lyon, France, includes several HFS scenarios with a large panel of critical events. The investigators aim to evaluate the effect of burden of workload and stress perceived by surgical specialty (including anesthesia) residents and nurses during HFS on the learning performance, and to grade different learning scenarios by their difficulty.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

In this observational study investigators aim to measure anesthesiology, surgeon residents and nurses' workload, stress level, and performance on high-fidelity simulation scenarios used routinely in the current anesthesiology, nurse and surgical training curriculum. A NASA TLX scale, 100 points numeric scale for anxiety (0 - no anxiety; 100 - maximal anxiety), automated quantitative pupillometry, Team Emergency Assessment Measure scale will be used to evaluate a workload, anxiety, stress, and performance. Age, sex, previous experience of HFS will be noted. All data will be anonymized. The participation in this study is voluntary and one can withdraw from this study at any time prior to or after the completion of any interview without any penalty.

Two investigators will independently evaluate the performance of HFS by direct observation and video record if necessary. NASA TLX questionnaire will be administrated immediately after HFS scenario and before the debriefing. Anxiety scale and pupillometry will be administrated before the beginning of HFS scenario and upon its completion.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rhône-Alpes
      • Lyon, Rhône-Alpes, France, 69007
        • CLESS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All medical students/nurse students enrolled in anesthesia/ surgeon simulation training and participating in the HFS training sessions of June 2017

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Lyon University medical student status on the day of the study
  • Enrolled in surgical specialty (including anesthesia) simulation training program

or

  • Lyon Anesthesia Nurses School student status on the day of the study
  • Enrolled in surgical specialty (including anesthesia) simulation training program
  • voluntary

Exclusion Criteria:

  • denial to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Observation TLX
surgical specialty ( including anesthesia) residents and nurses undergoing High Fidelity Simulation scenarios.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Task Load
Time Frame: immediately after the scenario
NASA TLX scale questionnaire
immediately after the scenario

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety scale
Time Frame: at baseline, at 20 minutes and at 60 minutes
100 points numeric scale for anxiety (0 - no anxiety; 100 - maximal anxiety)
at baseline, at 20 minutes and at 60 minutes
Pupillometry
Time Frame: at baseline, at 20 minutes and at 60 minutes
automated quantitative pupillometry
at baseline, at 20 minutes and at 60 minutes
HFS performance
Time Frame: at 20 minutes
Technical and Team Emergency Assessment Measure scale scores
at 20 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 22, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 22, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 17, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

3
Subscribe