Increasing Reporting of Intimidation of Medical Students With Simulation

May 8, 2018 updated by: Érica Patocskai, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Increasing Reporting of Intimidation of Medical Students With Simulation: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Intimidation of medical students by health care professionals is a well-documented phenomenon. Raising awareness of what constitutes intimidation is a preferred method for preventing it through increased reporting. Simulation is a novel method of raising awareness of intimidation.

This is a randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of simulation (involving actors), an educational video and no intervention, as adjuncts to group discussion, on students' ability to identify and report intimidation. Medical students from the University of Montreal in Montreal, Canada, will be recruited at the beginning of surgical clerkship. They will complete a standardized and validated pre-intervention questionnaire on their experience with intimidation consisting of multiple choice questions and short answers. They will be randomised to one of the three interventions lasting 70 minutes that will be followed by a 20-minute standardized discussion on intimidation with all students participating together. At the end of their surgical rotation, they will complete a similar post-intervention questionnaire with additional questions pertaining to the reporting of intimidation.

Differences in intimidation reporting after the intervention as well as a before and after comparison of the "Negative Acts Questionnaire" score will be studied.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

129

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1J4
        • Faculté de Médecine de l'Université de Montréal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medical students at the University of Montreal at the beginning of their surgical clerkship rotation.

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Simulation
During a suturing class at the simulation center, the students enter a classroom. Although the students are not aware of this, among them is an actor playing the role of a student. One of the two professors is also an actor. As the activity progresses, the professor targets the student played by an actor. The intimidation intensifies until the end. At the end of the activity, there is a debriefing explaining to the students that the bullying professor and the victim were actors.
Students witness the intimidation of one of their peers (who is an actor) by a professor (also an actor). (see arm description)
EXPERIMENTAL: Video
During a suturing class at the simulation center, after 55 minutes of suturing, the students will be exposed to a 15-minute video on workplace and hospital intimidation and how to manage it.
Student watch a 15-minute intimidation video (see arm description).
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Control
During a suturing class at the simulation center, the students suture for the entire 70-minute duration of the activity. They are not exposed to intimidation (control group).
No intervention. The students suture for 70 minutes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comfort in reporting intimidation
Time Frame: 6 weeks after enrollment
Based on post-intervention questionnaire question.
6 weeks after enrollment
Perception of intimidation after intervention
Time Frame: 6 weeks after enrollment
Based on post-intervention Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ-R)
6 weeks after enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline prevalence of intimidation
Time Frame: at enrollment
Based on pre-intervention Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ-R)
at enrollment
Before and after comparison
Time Frame: at enrollment vs 6 weeks post-intervention
Difference between pre and post-intervention Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ-R)
at enrollment vs 6 weeks post-intervention
Reasons for not reporting intimidation
Time Frame: at enrollment
Open-ended question asking why students don't report intimidation
at enrollment
Frequency of intimidation reporting
Time Frame: 6 weeks post-intervention
Did the students report intimidation during the 6 weeks of their surgical clerkship?
6 weeks post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 15, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 21, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 21, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 9, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16.422

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Simulation

Subscribe