Virtual Reality vs Inperson Simulation: A Non-inferiority Study

April 9, 2020 updated by: Thomas Caruso, Stanford University
The purpose of this study is to determine if Virtual Reality (VR) can elicit emotional responses that are captured via physiological biometrics such as heart rate variability and skin conductance levels. As a non-inferiority study the investigators anticipate the technologies will elicit an emotional not inferior to those responses of an in-person simulations of workplace scenarios (i.e medical error and workplace harassment).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Greater than 18 years of age
  • Personnel working or volunteering at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (LPCH) or Stanford Health Care (SHC) facilities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not consent
  • Are currently taking beta blockers or other chronotropic heart medication(s)
  • Have a history of severe motion sickness
  • Currently have nausea
  • Currently experiencing seizures
  • Are clinically unstable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: In-Person Simulation
Participants will experience in-person simulations of different workplace scenarios such as medical error and workplace harassment
In-person simulation of workplace-related scenarios with live actors
Experimental: Virtual Simulation
Participants will experience virtual simulations of different workplace scenarios such as medical error and workplace harassment via Virtual Reality headset.
Virtual simulation of workplace-related scenarios of pre-recorded videos using the same actors

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respiratory sinus arrhythmia
Time Frame: Throughout duration of simulation, approximately 15 minutes
Biometric sensors will be placed in strategic locations in order to collect respiratory sinus arrhythmia throughout either in-person or virtual simulation
Throughout duration of simulation, approximately 15 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Skin conductance levels
Time Frame: Throughout duration of simulation, approximately 15 minutes
Skin conductance levels as measured by electrodermal activity will be collected using biometric sensors throughout either in-person or virtual simulation
Throughout duration of simulation, approximately 15 minutes
Emotional levels
Time Frame: Throughout duration of intervention, two minutes before and after the intervention
Emotional affect will be self reported via validated scale before and after the intervention.
Throughout duration of intervention, two minutes before and after the intervention
VR Simulation Questionnaire
Time Frame: Three months post study, approximately 5 minutes
Participants will be given a questionnaire regarding their virtual or in-person simulation experience and the overall similarity to real-life on a scale from 1-5 (1=Completely Different and 5=Nearly Identical) Example Questions: "How true to real life were the emotions expressed during the scenario?" and "How true to real life was the the clinical environment?"
Three months post study, approximately 5 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 9, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 11, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 48883

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Work-Related Condition

Clinical Trials on In-person Simulation

Subscribe