Using SystemCHANGE™ to Enhance Medication Adherence in Older Adult Stroke Survivors

August 19, 2019 updated by: Cynthia Russell, University of Missouri, Kansas City

Randomized Controlled Pilot Study of a SystemCHANGE™ Medication Adherence Intervention in Older Adult Stroke Survivors

This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of using a SystemCHANGE intervention in older adult stroke survivors to improve medication adherence. Half the participants will receive the SystemCHANGE intervention, while the other half will receive the attention-control education intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Parkville, Missouri, United States, 64152
        • Jennifer Wessol

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≥50 years old
  • receives post-stroke care with Saint Luke's Neurological Consultants
  • prescribed at least 1, once a day, antithrombotic medication
  • able to provide informed consent
  • able to open an electronic cap
  • able to self-administer medications
  • has or has access to a telephone
  • has no cognitive impairment as determined by a score of 4 or greater on The Six- item Screener (SIS).

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SystemCHANGE™
During the intervention phase, the PI will visit both groups of participants at home at baseline and telephone them three times (day 3 ±2 days and months 1 and 2). Refer to tables 1 and 2 for intervention details. Treatment participants will implement SystemCHANGE™ activities related to medication taking with the assistance of the PI while attention-control participants will receive patient education materials on stroke. Perceived health data will be collected during the intervention phase. A 1-month maintenance phase follows the intervention phase. Electronic medication monitoring continues, but no intervention is delivered to either group.
Active Comparator: Attention-Control
An experienced stroke nurse will deliver the attention control intervention. Table 3.2 shows the 2-month attention-control intervention. The stroke materials were developed by the Saint Luke's Marion Bloch Neuroscience Institute and are given to every stroke patient prior to dismissal. The PI will call participants at day 3 ±2 days, and months 1 and 2 to review chapter(s) from the book and answer questions about it. Interval, frequency, and setting are all exactly the same for the intervention and control groups. If the control participant raises questions about medications or medication-taking, PI will refer them to their Neurologist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability and feasibility
Time Frame: one point in time at the end of the maintenance phase which is 3 months after randomization into groups
Open ended questionnaire
one point in time at the end of the maintenance phase which is 3 months after randomization into groups

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Social Support
Time Frame: One day at beginning of Intervention phase. Once 1 day at beginning of Maintenance phase.
The Social Support Appraisals Index (SS-A) is a 23-item self-administered, a self-report scale measuring the degree to which a person feels cared for, respected, and involved with family and friends. The scale had good reliability and validity (Cronbach α coefficients .90, .81, and .84) (Vaux et al., 1986).
One day at beginning of Intervention phase. Once 1 day at beginning of Maintenance phase.
Perceived Health
Time Frame: One day at beginning of Intervention phase. Once 1 day at beginning of Maintenance phase.
Perceived health status will be measured by one question, "How is your health in general?" Participant select excellent, very good, good, fair, poor, or very poor. Perceived health status reflects people's overall perception of their health, including both physical and psychological dimensions.
One day at beginning of Intervention phase. Once 1 day at beginning of Maintenance phase.
Personal Systems Behaviors
Time Frame: One day at beginning of Intervention phase. Once 1 day at beginning of Maintenance phase.
The Systems Thinking Survey (adapted for patients), a 20-item, 5-point Likert response scale measuring perceptions of personal system behaviors.
One day at beginning of Intervention phase. Once 1 day at beginning of Maintenance phase.
Medication Adherence
Time Frame: after randomization through end of maintenance phase for a total of 3 months
MA data will be retrieved from the MEMS®cap which is a medication cap containing a battery and microelectronics that records the date and the time of each cap removal to create a medication "event" ("MEMS® Cap versatile adherence monitoring cap," n.d.).
after randomization through end of maintenance phase for a total of 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer L. Wessol, BSN, University of Missouri, Kansas City
  • Study Chair: Cynthia L. Russell, Ph.D., professor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 28, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 6, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 24, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke, Ischemic

Clinical Trials on SystemCHANGE™

3
Subscribe