Remote Ischaemic Conditioning for Fatigue After Stroke

Remote Ischaemic Conditioning for Fatigue After Stroke (RICFAST) - a Pilot, Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo Controlled Trial

This is a pilot randomised control trial to assess the safety, compliance, and acceptability of delivering a 6-week programme of remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) to stroke patients suffering with fatigue, and study feasibility. A minimum of 34 patients who have suffered an ischeamic or haemorrhagic stroke and who suffer from fatigue, will be recruited and randomised to receive a 6-week programme of either RIC or a sham intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Up to 75% of stroke patients suffer from fatigue, the effect of which can be physical, cognitive or emotional, and presents a large barrier to progressing rehabilitation.

Remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) is a procedure whereby ischaemia is induced to a limb for short periods of time by inflating pressure cuffs around arms or legs to above systolic pressures (mmHg). This procedure is performed for periods that avoid physical injury to the limbs, but induce neurohormonal, systemic or vascular changes in the body. Such changes often result in improved collateralisation of blood supply to various areas of the body, as well as improved efficiencies of cellular metabolism. This may enhance the physical abilities of patients undergoing rehabilitation after stroke, particularly when aiming to improve endurance and fatigue.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Sheffield, United Kingdom, S10 2JF
        • Recruiting
        • Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
        • Contact:
          • Alessia Dunn
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ali Ali

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (aged > 18 years) who have had an ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke at least 6 weeks prior.
  • Symptoms of debilitating fatigue for at least 4 weeks (fatigues severity score of 28 or more).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History or presence of significant peripheral vascular disease in the upper limbs.
  • History or presence of complex neuropathic pains or peripheral neuropathy in the arms.
  • Presence of lymphoedema in the arms.
  • Presence of skin ulceration to the arms.
  • Hospitalisation for cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease within the last 4 weeks.
  • Uncontrolled arrhythmia, hypertension, diabetes or angina.
  • Third degree heart block or progressive heart failure.
  • Acute aortic dissection, myocarditis, or pericarditis.
  • Acute deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism or pulmonary infection.
  • Suspected or known dissecting aneurysm.
  • Uncontrolled visual or vestibular disturbance.
  • Known or suspected cause of fatigue e.g. obstructive sleep apnoea (Epworth > 15), depression (PHQ-9 > 14).
  • Modified Rankin Score > 4.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Remote Ischaemic Conditioning
4 cycles of 5 minutes of upper or lower (depending on tolerability) limb ischaemia followed by 5 minutes of reperfusion. This will be delivered using a manual shygnomanometer applied to the upper arm or leg and activated to go through 4 such cycles automatically. The blood pressure cuff in the active treatment arm will inflate to 200 mmHg (arm) and 220 mmHg (leg). RIC will be completed 3 times weekly for 4 weeks.
Induced ischaemia to a limb by inflating pressure cuffs around arms or legs to above systolic pressures (mmHg).
Sham Comparator: Sham Intervention
4 cycles of 5 minutes of upper or lower (depending on tolerability) limb ischaemia followed by 5 minutes of reperfusion. This will be delivered using a manual shygnomanometer applied to the upper arm or leg and activated to go through 4 such cycles automatically. The arm and leg blood pressure cuffs in the sham intervention will inflate to 20mmHg. Sham will be completed 3 times weekly for 4 weeks.
The sham intervention will inflate pressure cuffs to much lower levels for the same number of cycles.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events.
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Safety of a 6-week RIC intervention will be assessed by measuring the Number of Participants With Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment.
6 weeks
% of RIC cycles completed
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Compliance to RIC will be defined as achievement of 80% of intended RIC cycles. This will be assessed by a mobile compliance application.
6 weeks
Number of participants reporting RIC associated discomfort on a likert scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Reported grade of discomfort associated with RIC will be measured on a likert scale of 0-5, 0 being no discomfort 5 being great discomfort. Acceptance of RIC will be defined as less than 1/3 of participants reporting moderate or greater discomfort (3-4 on scale) and will be supported by qualitative interviews and diary recordings.
6 weeks
number of participants recruited within the first 2 months
Time Frame: 1 year
Study recruitment will be deemed feasible if four participants are recruited within the first 2 months.
1 year
Percentage of assessments completed
Time Frame: 1 year
Study assessments will be deemed feasible if >80% of assessments are completed.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with abnormal changes from baseline in full blood count
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Number of participants with changes to full blood count between baseline and after 6 week intervention period, leading to them lying outside the 'normal' range according to Sheffield Teaching Hospitals reference ranges. Any concerns or significant abnormalities will be referred to the principle investigator for appropriate action to ensure the safety of the participant.
6 weeks
number of participants with abnormal changes from baseline in urea and electrolyte (U&E) concentration
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Number of participants with changes to U&E concentration between baseline and after 6 week intervention period, leading to them lying outside the 'normal' range according to Sheffield Teaching Hospitals reference ranges. Any concerns or significant abnormalities will be referred to the principle investigator for appropriate action to ensure the safety of the participant.
6 weeks
number of participants with abnormal changes from baseline in liver function
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Number of participants with changes to liver function as measured by the liver function test (LFT) between baseline and after 6 week intervention period, leading to them lying outside the 'normal' range according to Sheffield Teaching Hospitals reference ranges. Any concerns or significant abnormalities will be referred to the principle investigator for appropriate action to ensure the safety of the participant.
6 weeks
Mean change from baseline in concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The inflammatory marker (CRP) will be measured at baseline and after 6 week intervention period to assess if there has been a change in concentration between baseline and after the intervention.
6 weeks
Mean change from baseline in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
ESR will be measured at baseline and after 6 week intervention period as a measure of inflammation.
6 weeks
Therapy Time in minutes
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Measured at baseline and after 6 week intervention period.
6 weeks
Mean change from baseline in activity Energy Expenditure measure in kCal
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Energy expenditure (kCal) will be measured using ACTiheart by CamnTech throughout the intervention period and changes from the baseline reviewed at the end of the 6 week intervention.
6 weeks
Mean change from baseline in minutes of activity per day measured by the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) measures physical activity levels from 3 domains: Activity at work, Travel to and from places, Recreational activities, as well as sedentary behaviour, in 16 questions, P1-P16. To analyse GPAQ data, metabolic equivalents (METs) are used to express the intensity of physical activities. MET is the ratio of a person's working relative to resting metabolic rate. Higher MET values indicate more intense activity. MET values are applied to time variables according to the intensity of the activity, 4 METS for time spent in moderate activities and 8 METS for vigorous activities. Mean/median time of physical activity on average per day is calculated by summing MET scores for all domains to calculate average activity per week, and dividing this score by 7 (p1t3+p4t6+p7t9+p10t12+p13t15)/7). The questionnaire will be completed at baseline and after 6 week intervention.
6 weeks
Mean change from baseline in distance walked as measured by the six minute walk test (6MWT)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The six minute walk test (6 MWT) is an exercise test that entails measurement of distance walked over a span of 6 minutes. Researcher will record the total distance walked, heart rate, blood pressure and Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE). This will be done at baseline and after 6 week intervention period.
6 weeks
Mean change from baseline in peak oxygen consumption (VO2 max, ml/Kg/min)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
At baseline and after 6 week intervention period.
6 weeks
Mean change from baseline in participant scores on the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Measured with multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI), a self report measure of fatigue. Participants indicate level of agreement with numerous statements associated with fatigue on a scale of 1-7, 1 being strongly disagree 7 being strongly agree. This is measured at baseline and after 6 week intervention period.
6 weeks
Mean change from baseline in participant scores on the modified rankin score (MRS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Disability after stroke will be measured using modified rankin score (MRS), a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. Symptoms are rated on a scale of 0 - 6, with 0 being 'no disability', rising in symptom severity to 6 being 'dead'. MRS will be taken at baseline and after 6 week intervention period.
6 weeks
Mean change from baseline in functional Independence as measured by the Barthel Index
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Measured using Barthel Index (BI), an ordinal scale used to measure performance in 10 items (activities of daily living (ADL)). Items are rated on a scale from 0 - 15 in increments of 5, with 0 being least independent and 15 being most independent. Scores for all items are added up to give a total score out of 100, with higher scores equating to more independence. This is taken at baseline and after 6 week intervention period.
6 weeks
Mean change from baseline in depression as measured by participant scores on PHQ9
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Depression will be measured using Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9). The patient indicates how many times over the last two weeks have they been bothered by a series of 9 issues. The scale ranges from 0/not at all to 3/ nearly every day. Scores from each item are added to produce a final score out of 27, with scores 0-4 indicating no depression, 5-9 mild depression, 10-14 moderate depression, 15-19 moderately severe depression and 20-27 severe depression. This is taken at baseline and after 6 week intervention period.
6 weeks
Mean change from baseline in anxiety as measured by participant scores on the GAD7
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Anxiety will be measured using the Generalised anxiety disorder assessment (GAD7). The patient indicates how many times over the last two weeks have they been bothered by a series of 7 issues. The scale ranges from 0/not at all to 3/ nearly every day. Scores from each item are added to produce a final score out of 21, Scores represent: 0-5 mild anxiety, 6-10 moderate anxiety, 11-15 moderately severe anxiety and 15-21 severe anxiety.This is taken at baseline and after 6 week intervention period.
6 weeks
Mean change from baseline in cognitive dysfunction as measured by participant scores on MOCA
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Cognitive dysfunction will be measured using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). This is a test with 8 domains, scores on each domain are added to produce a final score out of 30, with 26-30 equating to normal cognitive function. This will be completed at baseline and after 6 week intervention period.
6 weeks
Mean change from baseline in health related quality of life as measured by participant scores on EQ5D questionnaire.
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Health Related Quality of Life will be measured by the EQ5D questionnaire at baseline and after 6 week intervention. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale. This can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement. The scores on these five dimensions can be presented as a health profile or can be converted to a single summary index number (utility) reflecting preferability compared to other health profiles.
6 weeks
Mean change from baseline in concentration of GLP-1 in blood sample
Time Frame: 6 weeks
For a subset of patients who consent to having the MRI perfusion and spectroscopy studies as well as the blood analysis of biomarkers, blood samples will be analysed for GLP-1 levels at baseline and after 6 week intervention.
6 weeks
Mean change from baseline in heat shock protein levels
Time Frame: 6 weeks
For a subset of patients who consent to having the MRI perfusion and spectroscopy studies as well as the blood analysis of biomarkers, blood samples will be analysed for heat shock protein levels at baseline and after 6 week intervention.
6 weeks
Changes from baseline in Cerebral Perfusion (ml/min)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
For a subset of patients who consent to having the MRI perfusion and spectroscopy studies as well as the blood analysis of biomarkers, changes in cerebral perfusion between baseline and after 6-week intervention period will be analysed.
6 weeks
Changes from baseline in levels of N-acetyl aspartate as measured by spectroscopy
Time Frame: 6 weeks
For a subset of patients who consent to having the MRI perfusion and spectroscopy studies as well as the blood analysis of biomarkers, changes in levels of tissue metabolite N-acetyl aspartate (that may indicate loss or damage to neuronal tissue) between baseline and after 6-week intervention period will be analysed.
6 weeks
Changes from baseline in levels of creatine as measured by spectroscopy
Time Frame: 6 weeks
For a subset of patients who consent to having the MRI perfusion and spectroscopy studies as well as the blood analysis of biomarkers, changes in levels of tissue metabolite creatine (that may indicate cell death through ischaemia) between baseline and after 6-week intervention period will be analysed.
6 weeks
Changes from baseline in levels of lactate as measured by spectroscopy
Time Frame: 6 weeks
For a subset of patients who consent to having the MRI perfusion and spectroscopy studies as well as the blood analysis of biomarkers, changes in levels of tissue metabolite lactate between baseline and after 6-week intervention period will be analysed.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ali Ali, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 4, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fatigue

Clinical Trials on Remote Ischaemic Conditioning

3
Subscribe