Hyperopic LASIK With Crosslinking Versus Standard LASIK

July 18, 2017 updated by: Ahemd Abdelghany, Minia University

Hyperopic LASIK With Concurrent Prophylactic High-fluence Cross-linking Versus Standard LASIK Outcomes

Analysis corneal and refractive stability of hyperopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with and without concurrent prophylactic high-fluence cross-linking (CXL).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Interventional prospective consecutive comparative case control series of cases; 50 eyes of 25 patients with mean age 35.7 ± 12.4 (Range 18-61years) with hyperopia or hyperopic astigmatism underwent customized LASIK with concurrent prophylactic high-fluence cross-linking in right eye (group 1) and customized LASIK only in left eye (group 2). Cases with hyperopia +1 diopter to +6 diopters or hyperopic astigmatism up to 4 diopters were included in the study. Patients with previous intraocular or corneal surgery, active corneal disease were excluded from the study.

Main outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), cycloplegic refractive spherical equivalent (CRSE), keratometric measurements and spherical aberrations at 4 mm and maximum pupil and their evolution along 6 months postoperatively.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 61 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cases with hyperopia +1diopter to +6 diopters or hyperopic astigmatism up to 4 diopters

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with previous intraocular or corneal surgery, active corneal disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Hyperopic LASIK with crosslinking
group 1:hyperopic customized LASIK with concurrent prophylactic high-fluence cross-linking
LASIK with concurrent prophylactic high fluence crosslinking in right eye ( After the excimer laser ablation, and with the flap folded onto itself and protected with a dry sponge, one drop of Vibex Rapid™ , consisting of 0.10% saline-diluted riboflavin (a very slightly hypotonic solution, mixed with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, a dextran substitute), was placed on the exposed stromal bed afforded by the open LASIK flap and carefully spread over the bed area with an irrigating cannula for 60 seconds and LASIK only in left eye
Active Comparator: Hyperopic LASIK only
group 2: hyperopic customized LASIK only
LASIK with concurrent prophylactic high fluence crosslinking in right eye ( After the excimer laser ablation, and with the flap folded onto itself and protected with a dry sponge, one drop of Vibex Rapid™ , consisting of 0.10% saline-diluted riboflavin (a very slightly hypotonic solution, mixed with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, a dextran substitute), was placed on the exposed stromal bed afforded by the open LASIK flap and carefully spread over the bed area with an irrigating cannula for 60 seconds and LASIK only in left eye

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
assessment of changes in refractive spherical equivalent
Time Frame: preoperative and 3 months and 6 months postoperative
assessment of changes in manifest refraction by autorefractometer and then calculate spherical equivalent
preoperative and 3 months and 6 months postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jorge L Alio, MD, MD, Phd, FEBO

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 18, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 12, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 12, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Hyperopic LASIK

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hyperopia

Clinical Trials on LASIK

3
Subscribe