Randomized Controlled Trial for Exparel Hip Fracture

March 16, 2021 updated by: Eric Swart, University of Massachusetts, Worcester

Does the Use of Liposomal Bupivacaine Decrease Narcotic Requirements in Geriatric Hip Fractures? A Randomized, Double Blinded Control Trial

This is a prospective, randomized study looking at the effect that a long-acting local anesthetic has on pain control in patients having surgery for hip fractures. The investigators are conducting the study to see if that reduces the amount of pain medicine needed after surgery, and if it reduces other medical complications after surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Osteoporotic fragility fractures of the hip are common in the geriatric population, are increasing in frequency, and represent a growing social and economic burden. Pain control after surgical treatment is an area of growing interest, as improvement in post-injury pain is often an important indication for surgical treatment of hip fractures.

Typically a mainstay of post-operative pain control, the use of opiates has come under increasing scrutiny, as it has been shown to be associated with delirium, respiratory depression, and even may even lead to addiction or abuse in the medically frail geriatric population. These concerns have led to efforts to minimize the use of post-operative opiates in hip fracture patients. In that context, a treatment that could reduce the necessity of post-op narcotics while still improving pain control would be potentially valuable.

There has been growing interest in the use of long-acting local anesthetics for improving pain control in orthopaedics, particularly in the elective total joint arthroplasty population. Studies have shown that arthroplasty patients receiving long-acting local anesthetics have decreased opiate requirements, reduced length of stay, and lower costs. Although well-demonstrated in the elective arthroplasty population, the effects of long-acting local anesthetics have yet to be demonstrated in the hip fracture population. Given that these fractures frequently occur in medically frail patients with multiple comorbidities, in whom post-operative confusion and delirium are relatively common, there is the potential for treatments that decrease opiate requirements to demonstrate substantial medical and economic benefits.

Exparel (liposomal bupivacaine) and long-acting local anesthetics have been used extensively in hip replacement surgery and have not been shown to be associated with any increased risks. In the case of patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated with arthroplasty, the surgical techniques are identical to those being used in this study. Exparel has also been used in trauma surgery as well as foot and ankle surgery without any increased described risks, although its use explicitly in hip fractures has not been published. However, the PI has trained in other medical centers where Exparel is routinely used in hip fracture patients without any identified increased risks or complications, but there is a paucity of data on this subject, which is the rationale for this study.

The investigators hypothesize that in patients with osteoporotic fragility fractures of the hip, patients receiving intraoperative long-acting local anesthetics will have decreased pain and decreased post-operative opiate requirements, leading to less delirium and decreased hospital resource utilization during their index hospitalization.

The goal is to conduct a multi-center prospective randomized control trial to determine if liposomal bupivacaine is superior to standard of care by addressing the below separate but related aims:

  1. Determine the effectiveness of Exparel to reduce narcotic requirements and pain post operatively after hip fracture treatment. Excess narcotic use in the elderly population is associated with a host of complications often magnified by polypharmacy, including in hospital delirium, increased length of stay, nausea, constipation, urinary retention, respiratory depression and others. Decreasing narcotic usage in this group of patients following hip fracture can possibly reduce such complications. Patients will receive standard of care medical treatment and be randomized to intra-operative Exparel vs. placebo injections. Opioid requirements, complications, pain score, and length of stay will be assessed in the post-operative period. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that total morphine requirements and pain scores will be decreased in this group following the administration of exparel in the geriatric hip fracture fracture population.
  2. Determine the effectiveness of Exparel to reduce delirium in post-operative hip fracture patients. In hospital delirium in elderly patients is associated with poor outcomes, including prolonged length of stay, poor participation in rehabilitation, and falls. Use of a locally administered liposomal bupivacaine could decrease the need for additional medications for pain control in addition to decreased mental stress for patients in this unfamiliar situation, thus resulting in decreased episodes of delirium. The investigators will assess delirium utilizing Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) scores in the post-operative period at regularly scheduled intervals and compare average scores between the treatment / standard of care group. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that total episodes of delirium will be decreased in the liposomal bupivacaine group.
  3. Determine if Exparel is cost-effective in hip fracture patients. The costs associated with increased narcotic usage, prolonged stay, resources, and complications can be significant. The use of liposomal bupivacaine may lead to decreased resource utilization to care for hip fractures. The investigators will conduct an economic analysis evaluating total inpatient hospitalization costs including costs associated with length of stay, medication requirements, and resources associated with consultations and diagnostic evaluations. These costs will be compared against the cost of Exparel administration to evaluate the net cost effect of the intervention. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that the net cost of inpatient care will be decreased when compared to standard of care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40536
        • University of Kentucky
    • Massachusetts
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01655
        • Umass Memorial Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 55 or older
  • Sustaining either an OTA/AO type 31A or 31B fracture undergoing ORIF or hemiarthroplasty
  • Able to consent
  • Isolated injury

Exclusion Criteria:

  • OTA/AO 31B1 (Impacted/slightly displaced)
  • Baseline dementia or cognitive deficit
  • Inability to consent
  • Chronic Opioid use
  • End stage liver disease with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) greater than 20.
  • End stage renal disease as defined by patients requiring hemodialysis at least twice weekly
  • Polytrauma, defined as: concurrent upper or lower extremity fracture, pelvis fracture, spine fracture, rib fractures, or facial fractures, Blunt chest or abdominal trauma resulting in diagnosed organ injury, Head trauma resulting in intracranial bleed or diagnosed concussion
  • Allergy to amide-type local anesthetics
  • Prisoners (unlikely to be accessible for follow-up)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Exparel (Liposomal Bupivacaine)
Exparel (liposomal bupivacaine) is FDA approved, with a labeled indication of "single-dose infiltration into the surgical site to produce postsurgical analgesia."
Subcutaneous injection at conclusion of surgical fixation of hip fracture
Other Names:
  • Liposomal Bupivacaine
Placebo Comparator: Saline Control
Saline Solution (Sodium Chloride)
Saline Injection
Other Names:
  • Saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opiate Requirements
Time Frame: 72 hours
Morphine meq given
72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric Swart, MD, Umass Memorial Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Paul Matuszewski, MD, University of Kentucky

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 22, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Fractures

Clinical Trials on Exparel

3
Subscribe