Short Stay Unit vs Hospitalization in Acute Heart Failure (SSU-AHF)

September 18, 2024 updated by: PETER S PANG, Indiana University

Using Short Stay Units Instead of Routine Admission to Improve Patient Centered Health Outcomes for AHF Patients

The majority of the over one million annual AHF hospitalizations originate from the emergency department. Admitting and re-admitting lower risk AHF patients who don't need prolonged hospitalization may increase their risk for poor outcomes and decrease their quality of life: Safe alternatives to hospitalization from the ED are needed. We propose a strategy-of-care, short stay unit management of AHF (i.e. less than 24 hours), will lead to improved outcomes for lower risk AHF patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Nearly 85% of acute heart failure (AHF) patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with acute heart failure (AHF) are hospitalized. Once hospitalized, within 30 days post-discharge, 27% of patients are re-hospitalized or die. Attempts to improve outcomes with novel therapies have all failed. The evidence for existing AHF therapies are poor: No currently used AHF treatment is known to improve outcomes. ED treatment is largely the same today as 40 years ago. Hospitalizing patients who don't need it may contribute to adverse outcomes. Hospitalization is not benign; patients enter a vulnerable phase post-discharge, at increased risk for morbidity and mortality. Patients would prefer to be home, not hospitalized. Furthermore, hospitalization and re-hospitalization for AHF predominantly affects patients of lower socioeconomic status (SES). Avoiding hospitalization in patients who don't need it may improve outcomes and quality of life, while reducing costs.

Short stay unit (SSU: less than 24 hours) management of AHF is effective for lower risk patients. However, it's only been studied in small studies or retrospective analyses. In addition, some have considered the SSU 'cheating' for hospitals trying to avoid 30 day readmission penalties, since SSU or observation didn't count as an admission. However, this quality measure is now changing. A robust clinical effectiveness trial would demonstrate the effectiveness of this patient-centered strategy.

Using a multi-center, randomized controlled design, this clinical effectiveness trial will test whether Short Stay Unit AHF management for < 24 hours increases days-alive-and-out-of-hospital, Quality of Life assessment (QoL), caregiver burden, and costs compared to inpatient management.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

194

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • University of Alabama - Birmingham
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46201
        • Indiana University
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Henry Ford Health System
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
        • Beaumont Health System
    • Mississippi
      • Jackson, Mississippi, United States, 39216
        • University of Mississippi Medical Center
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63130
        • Washington University
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest School of Medicine
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15212
        • Allegheny Health Network
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37212
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • UT Southwestern Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion:

  1. ED physician clinical diagnosis of AHF;
  2. Planned admission for AHF
  3. Systolic blood pressure > 100mmHg, heart rate < 115bpm*
  4. Previous history of HF *Patients with atrial fibrillation but controlled HR are eligible

For Caregiver Burden assessments. The eligibility criteria for a caregiver: 1) person either self-identifies, or when asked identifies themselves, as the primary caregiver for the patient. If there are multiple caregivers, the person who self-identifies as providing the most care will be asked to provide verbal informed consent.

Exclusion:

  1. Transplanted organ of any kind or ventricular assist device patient;
  2. End stage renal disease, on dialysis, or eGFR < 20 mL/min;
  3. Acute coronary syndrome (e.g. EKG changes consistent with ischemia or troponin elevation secondary to ACS);
  4. Other acute co-morbid conditions (e.g. sepsis, altered mental status) that are unlikely to be treated within a SSU stay;
  5. Patients who require ventilatory support of any kind or intravenous vasodilators/vasopressor/inotropic support. Patients who receive a one-time dose of an intravenious vasodiolator, but are no longer on this medication, are eligible.
  6. Pregnant patients or any patient who has been pregnant in the last 3 months
  7. < 18 years of age
  8. Any patient who in the opinion of the clinician or investigator requires hospitalization or ICU level care or will require rehabilitation or skilled nursing after discharge from the ED or hospital
  9. Planned discharge from the emergency department
  10. Patients hospitalized within the last 30 days ONLY if the institution mandates these patients are observed. Otherwise these patients are eligible.
  11. De Novo (new Onset) AHF

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Short Stay Unit
Subjects are assigned to the short stay unit (SSU) for approximately 23 hours treatment and observation period. In the SSU, patients will receive usual care for AHF, which includes loop diuretics and nitroglycerin, as needed.
Subjects will be treated for acute heart failure in the SSU and observed for improvement then, if appropriate, discharged. If not appropriate for discharge they will be admitted to inpatient.
Other Names:
  • SSU
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Subjects are assigned to inpatient hospitalization. During hospitalization, patients will receive usual care for AHF, which includes loop diuretics and nitroglycerin, as needed.
Subjects who come to the ER with acute heart failure who are randomized to inpatient stay.
Other Names:
  • SOC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Days Alive and Out of Hospital
Time Frame: 30 day outcome
To demonstrate the effectiveness of a SSU AHF management strategy vs standard of care
30 day outcome

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life as Measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Time Frame: 30 day outcome
To determine quality of life using a heart failure questionnaire. We used the Short KCCQ, and the overall summary KCCQ score. The score ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 being the best possible score. Differences of 5 or more points are considered clinically significant.
30 day outcome

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All Cause Mortality and Re-hospitalization
Time Frame: 30 and 90 days from randomization
Assessment of time to event for this composite outcome
30 and 90 days from randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter S Pang, MD, Indiana University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 6, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 22, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 22, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 2, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Short Stay Unit

Subscribe