A Retrospective Study of Severe Plasmodium Vivax (SeverePV)

August 26, 2020 updated by: University of Oxford

A Retrospective Study to Assess the Rate of Plasmodium Vivax Infections Presenting With Severe Symptoms From 2001 to 2016 in North-western Thailand

Historically, Plasmodium vivax has been termed "benign" due to its non-life threatening clinical course and since the 1800's this view has been cultivated as demonstrated by the use of the term "benign tertian malaria" to describe the infection.However over the last 15 years, more severe P. vivax malaria is being reported, causing concern that severe P. vivax malaria is under diagnosed. The definition of severe P. vivax malaria borrows from P. falciparum and is primarily one of exclusion. Species PCR (polymerase chain reaction) is the only way to prove P. vivax mono-infection but is expensive and requires skilled staff and technology. In resource constrained settings, diagnostic testing is not available for detection of most non-malarial infections further affecting the ability to determine whether severe symptoms are due to P. vivax malarial infection or a concomitant one.

Retrospective studies from India, Pakistan, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea and Sudan support the existence of severe P. vivax malaria. However, inconsistent methodologies, definitions of severity, and use of diagnostic tests to exclude concomitant infection do not allow for standardised assessments for severe P. vivax infection across studies. A review by Baird, highlighted that the risk of being classed as suffering from severe illness was only minimally higher in P. falciparum than in P. vivax, but was unable to combine the data as a meta-analysis. The primary reported symptoms for severe P. vivax included severe anaemia particularly in children, severe thrombocytopaenia, respiratory distress, neurological syndromes (coma or seizures), renal and hepatic failure.

Prospective studies have shown similar results. Tjitra et al showed that 23% (675 of 2,937) patients admitted with microscopically diagnosed P. vivax infections in Papua, Indonesia had severe disease and that the risk of severe malaria was significantly higher when admitted with P. vivax than with P. falciparum. In studies from Papua New Guinea, few differences between the clinical presentation of P. falciparum and P. vivax were found in children with severe malaria. This appears to be similar in populations from Sudan, Pakistan and India. In contrast, in Thailand, anecdotal observations note a low prevalence of severe P. vivax infections.

The WHO criteria to assess severe P. falciparum have been extrapolated to P. vivax. In the 2015 WHO malaria guidelines some criteria now account for P. vivax, such as removing a minimum parasitaemia when assessing for severe anaemia. Whilst these criteria may not be the most sensitive tool to define severe P. vivax infections, it is used for this purpose. It has been suggested that additional clinical information may be necessary to define truly severe P. vivax cases.

In order to describe the characteristics of the severity of P. vivax infections in north-western Thailand, we will perform a retrospective review of annual reports of the outpatient database, the inpatient database and eligible inpatient medical records from 2001 to 2016. The WHO malaria guidelines and additional clinical information will be used to assess the severity of infection and thus, a rate of severe P. vivax can be determined.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

171

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tak
      • Mae Sot, Tak, Thailand, 63110
        • Shoklo Malaria Research Unit

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The retrospective data from approximately 600 P.vivax infected patients who have had routine clinical work performed in the outpatient and inpatient departments at SMRU during 2001-2016. The patient population consists of refugees and migrants living along the Thailand Myanmar border in north-western Thailand who seek health care at the SMRU hospitals.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients voluntarily presented at SMRU clinic during 2001-2016 with a diagnosis of P. vivax mono-infection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients voluntarily presented at SMRU clinic during 2001-2016 with fever and were seeking consultation for the treatment of malaria or other infections.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The ratio of the number of severe cases determined to be caused by P. vivax to the number of outpatient cases treated for P. vivax
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Compare the age of inpatient cases that meet or do not meet the 2015 WHO criteria for severe P. vivax
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Compare the sex of inpatient cases that meet or do not meet the 2015 WHO criteria for severe P. vivax
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Compare the medical history of inpatient cases that meet or do not meet the 2015 WHO criteria for severe P. vivax
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Compare the parasitaemia of inpatient cases that meet or do not meet the 2015 WHO criteria for severe P. vivax
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Compare the duration of hospital stay of inpatient cases that meet or do not meet the 2015 WHO criteria for severe P. vivax
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Compare the use of intravenous anti-malarial of inpatient cases that meet or do not meet the 2015 WHO criteria for severe P. vivax
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Compare the blood transfusion of inpatient cases that meet or do not meet the 2015 WHO criteria for severe P. vivax
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 27, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SMRU1706

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malaria, Vivax

3
Subscribe