Pilot of Pragmatic SBIRT Study

February 13, 2024 updated by: Yale University

Engaging Veterans Seeking Service-Connection Payments in Pain Treatment (PILOT)

Veterans seeking compensation for musculoskeletal (MSD) conditions often develop chronic pain and are at high risk for substance misuse. This study is designed to pilot test the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment for Pain Management (SBIRT-PM) intervention. SBIRT-PM is designed to reduce pain and reduce risky substance use among veterans applying for VA Benefits for a musculoskeletal condition, in part by helping Veterans get connected to comprehensive pain treatment. This pilot will involve a 2-year period to arrange for SBIRT Counselors at a single site to counsel Veterans throughout New England by phone with SBIRT-PM to test the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In 2015 alone, 97,223 new Veterans under age 35 began receiving compensation for injuries related to their military service. In total, there are 559,999 post-9/11 Veterans being compensated for back or neck conditions, and a partially overlapping 596,250 for limitation of flexion in joints. Veterans seeking compensation for musculoskeletal conditions often develop chronic pain and are at high risk for substance misuse. Early intervention is needed to arrest worsening pain and risky substance use, particularly among post-9/11 Veterans for whom engagement in non-pharmacological pain treatment has the potential to improve their overall quality of life and spare them the complications of opioid treatments. The service-connection application is an ideal point-of-contact for initiating early intervention treatments for these at-risk Veterans.

This study is designed to pilot test the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment for Pain Management (SBIRT-PM) intervention. SBIRT-PM is designed to reduce pain and reduce risky substance use among veterans applying for VA Benefits for a musculoskeletal condition, in part by helping Veterans get connected to comprehensive pain treatment. This pilot will involve a 2-year period to arrange for SBIRT Counselors at a single site to counsel Veterans throughout New England by phone with SBIRT-PM to test the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention.

During the two-years pilot trial, the team will prepare SBIRT-PM for implementation by establishing communication (Relational Coordination is the theoretical framework) between the "hub" where the SBIRT-PM clinician is sited and the "spoke" sites, establishing study-related procedures, and piloting the intervention at each of the eight VA medical centers in New England.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
        • Yale University
      • West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516
        • VA Connecticut Healthcare System (VACHS)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Post-9/11 Veteran applying for MSD-related compensation, as ascertained from filed claim,
  • Reports pain ≥4 on the pain Numerical Rating Scale (threshold for moderately severe pain);
  • Availability of a landline or cellular telephone for SBIRT-PM.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Reports inability to participate during the study enrollment call
  • Received three or more non-pharmacological pain treatment modalities (as previously categorized within the last 12 weeks from VA.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SBIRT-PM
Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment for Pain Management (SBIRT-PM) was developed to promote engagement in multi-modal non-pharmacological pain management among compensation-seeking Veterans with chronic pain. In SBIRT-PM, a clinician meets with the Veteran after the compensation examination to address the presenting MSD complaint. The clinician addresses Veterans' motivation for multi-modal pain care, and explains how pain can be managed using a variety of non-pharmacological pain management services. The clinician spells out how those services can be accessed at VA. Using permissive language about how pain is commonly self-medicated with substances, the clinician transitions to inquiries about use of prescription and non-prescription substances. The clinician then attempts to motivate Veterans to change their behavior if they are misusing substances. Thus, SBIRT-PM addresses the Veteran's presenting pain complaint first and nascent substance use subsequently.
SBIRT-PM involves an initial telephone-delivered session followed by up to three calls to Veterans in a 12-week period to support Veteran engagement in multi-modal non-pharmacological pain care and to motivate those who misuse substances to change this problematic behavior. SBIRT-PM also includes coordination between the SBIRT-PM clinicians and the PACT nurse case manager after the initial session to support these patient outcomes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Non-Pharm Pain Treatment Modalities Received
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
A self-reported measure developed by the Pain Management Collaboaratory (PMC3). Questionnaire asks about the use of 13 different non-pharmacological pain treatments over the past 3 months. Below we present the mean number of non-pharmacological pain treatments received at baseline and then at week 12.
Baseline, Week 12
Substance Use
Time Frame: Baseline, week 12
Measured by the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST). This self-reported assessment asks about the use of 10 classes of substances used over the preceding 3 months. In the below table, we present the number of participants that endorsed having used the indicated substance at baseline and week 12.
Baseline, week 12
Change in Pain Severity
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Measured by the pain severity subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI is a validated instrument to assess chronic non-cancer pain. The pain severity subscale consists of 4 items (worst pain, least pain, average pain, current pain) rated in the past 24 hours on a 0-10 scale- higher scores indicate higher pain severity. The four items are averaged to get a score. Below we present the mean, within-person change in pain severity from baseline to week 12. Minimally clinically important difference would be a 30% reduction in pain severity.
Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in Pain Interference
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Measured by the pain interference subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI is a validated instrument to assess chronic non-cancer pain. The pain interference subscale consists of 7 items rated in the past 24 hours on a 0-10 scale- higher scores indicate higher interference from pain. The 7 items are averaged to get a score. Below we present the mean, within-person change in pain intensity from baseline to week 12. Minimally clinically important difference would be a 1 point reduction in pain intensity.
Baseline to 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marc Rosen, MD, Yale University/ VA Connecticut Healthcare System
  • Principal Investigator: Steve Martino, PhD, Yale University/ VA Connecticut Healthcare System

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 17, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 17, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2000022664_a
  • UG3AT009758 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on SBIRT-PM

Subscribe