Urethral Catheter Immobilization Device to Reduce Catheter-Related Discomfort

May 24, 2021 updated by: Shahin Tabatabaei, Massachusetts General Hospital

Use of a Urethral Catheter Immobilization Device to Reduce Pain and Discomfort Associated With Catheter Mobility in Post-Prostatectomy Patients

This is a randomized controlled study to determine the efficacy and safety of a patented urethral catheter support device designed to reduce discomfort associated with urethral catheter mobility in males.

Movement of a catheter within the urethra is a source of discomfort for patients. The investigators hypothesize that this discomfort can be reduced by using an external device designed to securely fasten the catheter to the penis.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Detailed Description

Indwelling urethral catheters are a source of discomfort and pain in males, particularly when in place for extended periods of time. All patients require catheterization for a minimum of 10 days following radical prostatectomy. Currently, catheters are secured to the patient's leg using tape or an elastic leg strap. This point of securing, however, allows the tip of the penis and the urethral meatus to move in different vectors from the catheter. Data demonstrating urethral catheter hypermobility as an etiology of pain and discomfort have not been reported. However, clinical experience suggests that this type of catheter mobility is associated with significant discomfort.

It is predicted that the use of an external urethral catheter immobilization device (Patent: Simpson et al., US8500719, 2013) designed to secure/minimize catheter movement relative to the tip of the penis will greatly improve catheter associated pain and discomfort in men undergoing radical prostatectomy. The catheter immobilization device is an FDA-approved, 510(k) exempt, pliant tubular structure comprised of Suprazote Foam (Zotefoams) that surrounds the penile shaft. The foam support has a rigidity greater than that of the flaccid penis. It is bi- lobed (i.e., two identical halves) that hinge together to close around the tip of the penis with an aperture aligned with the urethra. The catheter extends through this opening and is secured to the device does not alter the urethral catheter in any fashion. The device limits catheter movement radial to the axis of the catheter. This, in turn, keeps the catheter in line with the urethra, reducing abrasion and traction to the meatus and urethra.

To test the hypothesis, a randomized-controlled trial will be performed in male patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. These men will be randomized to two arms: one arm will have the device fitted around their catheter after surgery is complete while the other will not have the device fitted. Outcome measures involving catheter-related pain and discomfort will then be assessed until the urethral catheter is removed per standard of care after radical prostatectomy.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy at the Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Anticipated intra-operative placement of an 18 or 20 French, latex or silicone urethral catheter at the conclusion of the operation (standard of care)
  • At least 18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to speak, read or understand English
  • Apparent sore, rash, or infection on the penis
  • Anatomic abnormalities that would prevent proper application and use of the device
  • Patients with significant physical or mental disability that, in the opinion of the treating surgeon, might prevent safe placement or removal of the device, or completion of the symptom-based survey.
  • Patients with fragile skin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Urethral catheter immobilization
Subjects randomized to the intervention group will undergo radical prostatectomy with placement of the urethral catheter per the standard of care. The urethral catheter immobilization device will be applied in the operating room prior to the patient being transported to the recovery room. Subjects will be informed on safe use of the device and must demonstrate competency in removing and replacing the device prior to discharge. Subjects will also be given an elastic leg strap, which they may use concurrently with the device. Subjects will attend routine follow up appointments with their surgeon for removal of the urethral catheter and void trial per standard of care, at which the device will no longer be needed.

Subjects assigned to the control group will undergo radical prostatectomy with placement and securing of the urethral catheter per the standard of care. The catheter will be secured to the leg using cloth tape. Subjects will also be given an elastic leg strap that they may use following discharge, as is routine. Subjects will attend routine follow up appointments with their surgeon for removal of the urethral catheter and void trial.

Subjects will be asked to fill out a symptom-based questionnaire prior to leaving the office. This will conclude their participation in the study.

Other Names:
  • Indwelling urethral catheter support
NO_INTERVENTION: No urethral catheter immobilization
Subjects randomized to the control group will undergo radical prostatectomy with placement and securing of the urethral catheter per the standard of care. The catheter will be secured to the leg using cloth tape. Subjects will also be given an elastic leg strap that they may use following discharge, as is routine. Subjects will attend routine follow up appointments with their surgeon for removal of the urethral catheter and void trial per standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Urethral catheter related pain/discomfort
Time Frame: At follow-up visit for foley removal (10 days after surgery)
To be assessed via a proprietary questionnaire that is multiple choice and designed to determine the nature of catheter related pain/discomfort. Pain is to be measured on a scale of 1 to 10. Subsequent descriptions of the pain (location, aggravating factors, relieving factors, etc.) and impact are to be answered as multiple choice questions so as to structure the responses without limiting the response.
At follow-up visit for foley removal (10 days after surgery)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events secondary to urethral immobilization
Time Frame: Through post-operative day # 1 and at follow-up visit for foley removal (10 days after surgery)
Complications related to the urethral catheterization immobilization device will be assessed including pain/discomfort related to the device itself, urinary tract infection, skin rash, compromised skin integrity, skin infection, penile edema, restricted blood flow to penis, penile necrosis secondary to restricted blood flow, tightness or discomfort during erection, etc.
Through post-operative day # 1 and at follow-up visit for foley removal (10 days after surgery)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shahin Tabatabaei, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Urology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2018

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Catheter-Related Discomfort

Clinical Trials on Urethral catheter immobilization

Subscribe