Two Surgical Approaches for Root Coverage of Teeth Presenting Gingival Recession and Non-carious Cervical Lesion

August 31, 2020 updated by: Mauro Pedrine Santamaria, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho

Comparison of Different Surgical Approaches for Root Coverage of Teeth Presenting With Gingival Recession Associated With Non-carious Cervical Lesion Partially Restored With Composite Resin. Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The aim of the present study is to compare the use of the xenogeneic graft (MC) plus coronary advanced flap (CAF) and the coronary advanced flap alone, both associated with the partial restoration of composite resin in the treatment of gingival recessions associated with non-carious cervical lesion.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, parallel and controlled clinical trial. The population evaluated in the study was selected at Institute of Science and Technology (ICT), São José dos Campos, College of Dentistry.

Sixty patients presenting gingival recession will be divided in 2 groups:

  • Group 1 - Test: 30 gingival recessions associated with non-carious cervical lesions that will receive partial composite resin restoration and periodontal surgery for root coverage through a xenogenic collagen matrix graft (CAF + MC + R)
  • Group 2 - control: 30 gingival recessions associated with non-carious cervical lesions that will receive partial composite resin restoration and periodontal surgery for root coverage (CAF + R) without graft.

The surgeries, as well as all postoperative follow-up, were performed at the dental clinic of ICT. Two horizontal incisions were made at right angles to the adjacent interdental papillae, without interfering with the gingival margins of neighboring teeth. Two oblique vertical incisions were extended beyond the mucogingival junction, and a trapezoidal mucoperiosteal flap was raised up to the mucogingival junction. After this point, a split-thickness flap was extended apically, releasing the tension and favoring coronal positioning of the flap.The exposed root surface was gently scaled and planed until it became smooth in the connective tissue graft (CTG) group. For those allocated to CTG plus composite resin (CR) group, a sterile rubber dam was placed to isolate the operative field and the non-carious cervical lesion restoration was performed with a nanocomposite resin (Filtek Supreme - 3M - St. Paul, Minnesota, USA), following the manufacturer's instructions. Afterward, the both groups received a thin and small connective tissue graft that was sutured over the root/restoration surface. Then, the flap was coronally positioned and sutured to completely cover the graft.

Clinical parameters were assessed at baseline and 3 and 6 months post-operatively.

Statistical Analysis The null hypothesis considered in the study was the absence of difference in the clinical parameters between the different groups. For data analysis, the statistical program was used (SigmaPlot). The demographic and clinical data were compared between the groups using Student's t-test. The data were first analyzed for homogeneity using the Shapiro-Wilk test, which indicated non-normal distribution. . Those presenting Shapiro-Wilk p values < 0.05 were analyzed using a Friedman test (for intragroup comparisons) and Mann-Whitney tests (for intergroup comparisons). Patients' esthetics and discomfort measures using a visual analog scale (VAS) were analyzed by T-tests. The frequency of sites that were scored as very good or excellent in each group by qualitative cosmetic evaluation (QCE) analysis, the frequency of complete root coverage, bleeding on probing (BOP), and the presence or absence of plaque at the site were compared using χ2 tests. Intergroup root esthetic scale (RES) comparisons were performed with a T-test. A significance level of 0.05 was adopted.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • São Paulo
      • São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil, 12245000
        • São Paulo State University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • presenting Miller class I or II gingival recession in the maxillary canines or premolars associated with non-carious cervical lesion;
  • teeth included in the study should present pulp vitality;
  • patients presenting no signs of active periodontal disease and full-mouth plaque and bleeding score ≤ 20%;
  • patients older than 18 years old;
  • probing depth ˂ 3 mm in the included teeth;
  • patients who agreed to participate and signed an informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with systemic problems (cardiovascular, blood dyscrasias, immunodeficiency, and diabetes, among others) that will contraindicate the surgical procedure
  • patients taking medications known to interfere with the wound healing process or that contraindicate the surgical procedure
  • smokers or pregnant women
  • patients who underwent periodontal surgery in the area of interest;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: CAF+R
First of all, a sterile rubber dam will be placed to isolate the operative field and the non-carious cervical lesion restoration was performed with a nanocomposite resin (Filtek Supreme - 3M- St. Paul, Minnesota, USA), following the manufacturer's instructions. CAF treatment will be performed by starting with two divergent releasing incisions lateral to the recessed area. A sulcular incision will be made to unite the releasing incisions and the flap will be raised beyond the mucogingival junction (MGJ) in split-full-split thickness. Sling sutures will be placed to stabilize the flap in a coronal position 2 mm above the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), followed by interrupted sutures to close the releasing incisions.
Periodontal surgical technique to treat gingival recessions.
Other Names:
  • Periodontal plastic surgery
Restorative procedure to treat tooth structure loss.
Other Names:
  • Composite resin restoration (Filtek Supreme - 3M)
Experimental: CAF+R+MC
First of all, a sterile rubber dam will be placed to isolate the operative field and the non-carious cervical lesion restoration was performed with a nanocomposite resin (Filtek Supreme - 3M - St. Paul, Minnesota, USA), following the manufacturer's instructions. CAF treatment will be performed by starting with two divergent releasing incisions lateral to the recessed area. A sulcular incision will be made to unite the releasing incisions and the flap will be raised beyond the mucogingival junction (MGJ) in split-full-split thickness. Additionally, this group will receive the xenogenous collagen matrix graft (Geistlich) on the recessed area before the sutures. Then, the flap will be coronally positioned and sutured to completely cover the graft.
Periodontal surgical technique to treat gingival recessions.
Other Names:
  • Periodontal plastic surgery
Restorative procedure to treat tooth structure loss.
Other Names:
  • Composite resin restoration (Filtek Supreme - 3M)
Xenogenous graft placed in the surgical site.
Other Names:
  • Xenogenous collagen matrix

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recession reduction
Time Frame: 1 year
Recession reduction from baseline measured in millimetres
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Root coverage esthetic score
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mauro P Santamaria, PhD, ICT-UNESP

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 4, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 27, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingival Recession

Clinical Trials on CAF

Subscribe