Low-Phosphate Diet and Fibroblast Growth Factor-23 Level

September 29, 2018 updated by: Wan-Chuan Tsai

The Effect of Low-Phosphate Diet on Fibroblast Growth Factor-23 Level in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis

The aims of the study are to evaluate the effect of low-phosphate diet on FGF23 level and to determine the optimal amount of dietary phosphate restriction in hemodialysis patients. In particular, the investigators will assess the comparing effect of pre-specified low-phosphate diets, very low-phosphate diet, phosphate-to-protein ratio (PPR) value of 8 mg/g, versus low-phosphate diet, PPR value of 10 mg/g, on the change of FGF23 and phosphate level.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In patients with hemodialysis, the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is high, and is the leading cause of death. Among several cardiovascular risk factors of hemodialysis patients, elevated fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF23) level is common, and plays major role in the development of CVD with independent pathophysiologic mechanisms. Evidence from animal studies demonstrated that low-phosphate diet reduced FGF23 level. Clinical trials assessing the effect of dietary phosphate restriction on FGF23 focused on non-dialysis populution. However, little is known about the effect of low-phosphate diet on FGF23 in hemodialysis patients who have higher prevalence of hyperphosphatemia and severely elevated FGF23 level. In addition, current clinical guideline, based on evidence from observational studies of non-dialysis population, has recommended that dietary phosphate intake should be restricted to 800-1000 mg/day (adjusted for dietary protein needs) when serum phosphate levels are greater than 5.5 mg/dL in those with kidney failure. For hemodialysis population, the optimal amount of dietary phosphate restriction has not been determined. The aims of the study are to evaluate the effect of low-phosphate diet on FGF23 level and to determine the optimal amount of dietary phosphate restriction in hemodialysis patients. In particular, the investigators will compare the effect of pre-specified low-phosphate diets, very low-phosphate diet, phosphate-to-protein ratio (PPR) value of 8 mg/g, versus low-phosphate diet, PPR value of 10 mg/g, on the change of FGF23 and phosphate level.

It is to conduct a randomized, active-controlled trial with cross-over design at a hemodialysis unit of tertiary teaching hospital in Northern Taiwan. Subjects with aged older than 20 years, end-stage renal disease undergoing thrice-weekly hemodialysis for more than three months, having adequate dialysis (urea reduction ratio equal to or greater than 65%) and the most recent serum phosphate level greater than 5.5 mg/dL or between 3.5 and 5.5 mg/dL with regular phosphate binder use will be randomly assigned into two groups: those in group A will receive 2-day diet with known PPR of 8 mg/g, followed by 5-day washout period and then receive another 2-day diet with PPR of 10 mg/g. The opposite order of diets will be prescribed in group B. The study diets will be prepared and cooked at hospital cafeteria. Dietary compositions of the study diets were analyzed before the start of the study. Primary outcome measures are difference in change-from-baseline intact FGF-23 level between the two dietary interventions. Secondary outcomes include changes in serum phosphate, intact parathyroid hormone and C-terminal FGF-23 level.

Since food additives include readily absorbable inorganic phosphorus, only natural food sources were chosen for study diets. All study food items had the following unique characteristics including: 1. Using locally produced raw materials. 2. Meeting healthy and safety requirements. 3. Complying with national quality standards. Prior to enrollment of the eligible patients, the study diets were prepared and cooked with the food hygiene practice using Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) system at hospital cafeteria and dietary composition of study diets were analyzed for chemical analysis. With reference to Association of Official Analytical Communities (AOAC) Official Method 984.27, phosphorus, and calcium were determined by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) analysis with the detection limit of 0.1 mg/L. In brief, the sample weight were obtained, the edible portions of samples were ashed at high temperature, digested in nitric acid, and used inductively coupled plasma to determine their actual contents of phosphorus and calcium. With reference to Taiwanese official methods, study diets were measured for analyses of protein, fat, saturated fat, sugar, moisture, and ash. Carbohydrates were calculated by the formula: 100 - (Protein + Fat + Moisture + Ash) (g/100 g). Calories were calculated by the formula: Protein (g) x 4 kcal + Fat (g) x 9 kcal + Carbohydrate (g) x 4 kcal.

Based on the measured values of food items, dietitian had crafted low-phosphate diets. Less than 800 mg per day of phosphate amount is designed to fulfill the current clinical recommendation. Two different contents of phosphate diets were prepared to find out the optimal amount of dietary phosphate. Each of the diets was designed to have similar calcium, protein and total caloric contents but only differ in phosphate contents. To enhance nutrition, and to reduce phosphate amount and bioavailability, study diets were designed to fulfill the following criteria including high protein diet (≧1.2 g/kg/day), adequate calories (≧ 30 kcal/kg/day), low phosphate-to-protein ratio (< 10 mg/g), and higher percentage of plant source of phosphate than that of animal source. In addition, meats were sliced and boiled for 30 minutes before cooking to reduce the amount of phosphate while preserving protein content.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • New Taipei City, Taiwan
        • Far Eastern Memorial Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with end-stage kidney disease undergoing thrice-weekly hemodialysis for more than three months, the most recent serum phosphate level greater than 5.5 mg/dL or between 3.5 and 5.5 mg/dL with regular phosphate binder use, and having adequate dialysis (urea reduction ratio equal to or greater than 65%)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with serum albumin less than 2.5 g/dL, having psychiatric disorders, mental retardation or poor adherence

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A
Participants in group A consumed a 2-day very low-phosphate diet with PPR of 8 mg/g, followed by a 5-day washout period in which they adhered to usual diets, and then consumed a 2-day low-phosphate diet with PPR of 10 mg/g.
Very low-phosphate diet, PPR value of 8 mg/g, vs. low-phosphate diet, PPR value of 10 mg/g
Active Comparator: Group B
Compared with group A, the opposite order of low-phosphate diets will be prescribed in group B.
Very low-phosphate diet, PPR value of 8 mg/g, vs. low-phosphate diet, PPR value of 10 mg/g

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in change-from-baseline intact FGF-23
Time Frame: 2 days
Difference in change-from-baseline intact FGF-23 level between two low-phosphate diets, very low-phosphate diet, PPR value of 8 mg/g, with low-phosphate diet, PPR value of 10 mg/g
2 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in change-from-baseline serum phosphate
Time Frame: 2 days
Difference in change-from-baseline serum phosphate level between two low-phosphate diets, very low-phosphate diet, PPR value of 8 mg/g, with low-phosphate diet, PPR value of 10 mg/g
2 days
Difference in change-from-baseline intact parathyroid hormone
Time Frame: 2 days
Difference in change-from-baseline intact parathyroid hormone level between two low-phosphate diets, very low-phosphate diet, PPR value of 8 mg/g, with low-phosphate diet, PPR value of 10 mg/g
2 days
Difference in change-from-baseline C-terminal FGF23
Time Frame: 2 days
Difference in change-from-baseline C-terminal FGF23 level between two low-phosphate diets, very low-phosphate diet, PPR value of 8 mg/g, with low-phosphate diet, PPR value of 10 mg/g
2 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wan-Chuan Tsai, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 3, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 8, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hyperphosphatemia

Clinical Trials on Low-phosphate diet

3
Subscribe