Fitness and Longevity in Exercise (FLEX)

December 2, 2022 updated by: KrisAnn Oursler, University of Maryland, Baltimore
The study objective was to determine the safety and efficacy of aerobic exercise in older HIV-infected men in a randomized trial comparing different levels of exercise intensity.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study was a randomized trial of moderate-intensity versus high-intensity aerobic exercise (AEX) training in older HIV-infected adults. Funding was provided by K23 AG024896 (PI, Oursler) and the UMB Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center P60 AG12583 (PI, Goldberg).

The central hypothesis was that high-intensity AEX training is well-tolerated and significantly increases aerobic capacity in older HIV-infected adults.

The study met its objectives:

  1. Scientific AIMS met:

    1. High-intensity AEX training significantly increases aerobic capacity
    2. Both moderate-intensity and high-intensity AEX training improve ambulatory function and endurance.
    3. Activity of skeletal muscle oxidative enzymes is reduced, and associated with aerobic capacity.
  2. Feasibility Objectives met:

    1. AEX training is safe and well-tolerated in older HIV-infected adults.
    2. Skeletal muscle punch biopsy is safe and well-tolerated in older HIV-infected adults.
    3. Preliminary data was collected on plasma biomarkers of inflammation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

31

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV+
  • stable combination antiretroviral therapy (cART)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • AIDS defining conditions in the prior six months
  • Conditions that increase the risk of exercise training per the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Moderate-intensity aerobic exercise
In the moderate-intensity aerobic exercise group, participants performed a self-paced 1-mile walk (3-5 METs) on an indoor track in the same exercise center as the high-intensity exercise group. Initial sessions lasted 20-30 minutes and were increased weekly to 45 minutes in parallel to the duration of the high-intensity exercise group.
Participants attended center-based exercise sessions three times per week at the research exercise training facility located at the Baltimore VA Medical Center. All exercise training was performed under the supervision of research exercise physiologists. Heart rate (HR) was measured continuously during each session using a Polar HR watch and chest strap allowing for assessment and maintenance of treatment fidelity. Exercise logs included details on exercise type, duration, time in target heart rate zone, blood pressure and perceived intensity during each training session.
Experimental: High-intensity aerobic exercise
In the high-intensity aerobic exercise group, exercise training was performed on a motorized treadmill with occasional substitution with the elliptical machine as needed for joint pain. Target heart rate was based on the baseline treadmill test and was calculated as percentage of the heart rate reserve (HRR=maximal HR-resting HR). Initially, participants trained for 20-30 minutes at 50-60% of HRR. Duration and intensity was increased by 10% weekly so that within 5-7 weeks the aerobic exercise sessions lasted 30-45 minutes at 70-85% of HRR and at the end of the 16 weeks lasted 40-45 minutes at 75-90% of HRR.
Participants attended center-based exercise sessions three times per week at the research exercise training facility located at the Baltimore VA Medical Center. All exercise training was performed under the supervision of research exercise physiologists. Heart rate (HR) was measured continuously during each session using a Polar HR watch and chest strap allowing for assessment and maintenance of treatment fidelity. Exercise logs included details on exercise type, duration, time in target heart rate zone, blood pressure and perceived intensity during each training session.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline Cardiorespiratory Fitness at 16 weeks
Time Frame: 16-weeks
Cardiorespiratory Fitness measured by VO2peak
16-weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline Six-minute walk distance at 16 weeks
Time Frame: 16-weeks
Distance walked at normal pace in 6 minutes
16-weeks
Change from baseline body composition at 16 weeks
Time Frame: 16-weeks
body composition measured as total and regional lean tissue and fat mass (DXA)
16-weeks
Change from baseline exercise endurance at 16 weeks
Time Frame: 16-weeks
exercise endurance measured as time on treadmill during modified Bruce protocol
16-weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
skeletal muscle oxidative function
Time Frame: baseline
activity of enzymes in oxidative function from muscle biopsy
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Krisann Oursler, MD, University of Maryland, Baltimore

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 19, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 29, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

April 23, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 16, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HP-00042601

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Data, which include PHI, are available from the University of Maryland School of Medicine Institutional Review Board for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aging

Clinical Trials on Exercise training

3
Subscribe