Multi-site Validation and Application of a Consensus DSC-MRI Protocol

Multi-site Validation and Application of a Consensus Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DSC-MRI) Protocol

This clinical trial is to validate and demonstrate the clinical usefulness of a protocol for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in people with high grade glioma brain tumors.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Although DSC-MRI itself is not novel, the consensus protocol tested herein is newly developed in response to a stated need by federal agencies (FDA, NCI) for standardization of imaging endpoints, including perfusion-weighted MRI, in multi-center clinical trials of GBM therapies. Through use of stereotactic methodologies that have been used to demonstrate that rCBV(relative cerebral blood flow) and FTB(fractional tumor burden) measures made by the consensus DSC-MRI protocol are concordant with tissue histology, this multi-site trial will be the first to validate a consensus DSC-MRI protocol on multiple platforms representing all major MRI scanner manufacturers. The trial also formally compares two contrast agent dosing schemes proposed in the consensus protocol, a single-dose BTIP-compliant scheme and a double-dose scheme. Such a comparison has never been tested in patients before, and addresses a longstanding controversy regarding contrast agent administration and dosing for DSC-MRI. Successful validation of the consensus DSC-MRI protocol will likely shift clinical practice paradigms. To date, the widespread adoption of DSC-MRI has been limited by inconsistent published methodologies, rCBV thresholds, and impact on clinical decision making. This trial seeks to improve confidence in DSCMRI methodology as it will foster its adoption for multicenter trials, facilitating the development and testing of novel therapeutic agents and treatment strategies for GBM, and shift clinical practice paradigms by providing strong evidence to support the inclusion of DSC-MRI in established response assessment criteria (i.e., modified RANO).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85054
        • Mayo Clinic
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02912
        • Brown University
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
        • Medical College of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically proven intracranial glioblastoma or gliosarcoma at initial surgery
  • Patient is currently being treated with standard first-line therapy for glioblastoma/gliosarcoma
  • Karnofsky performance status ≥ 70
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Women must not be pregnant or breast-feeding as gadolinium enhanced MRI is contra-indicated
  • Progressive contrast enhancement (> 25% increase in contrast enhancing volume compared to nadir, not corresponding to a region of peri-operative infarct seen on immediate post-op MRI) identified on routine surveillance MRI, with plan for surgical biopsy/resection. Measurable enhancement is defined as two perpendicular in-plane diameters of at least 10 mm and at least 10 mm in the 3rd orthogonal direction. This must be the patient's initial recurrence.
  • Intratumoral hemorrhage (acute, subacute, or chronic) as seen on hemosiderin-sensitive (gradient-echo) MRI may preclude patient inclusion because of anticipated limited evaluation due to magnetic susceptibility artifact on the heavily T2*-weighted DSC-MRI images. If the region of enhancing tumor not affected by blooming artifact on the hemosiderin-sensitive images does not meet the 10 x 10 x 10 mm "measurable enhancement" threshold specified elsewhere, the patient is ineligible.
  • Patients must be able to tolerate brain MRI scans with dynamic intravenous gadolinium-based contrast agent injections
  • No known allergy-like reaction to gadolinium or moderate or severe allergic reactions to one or more allergens as defined by the American College of Radiology (ACR);
  • Weight compatible with limits imposed by the MRI scanner table.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Does not meet inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: DSC-MRI scan
All subjects will receive a double dose injection protocol that will be split into multiple doses for sequential DSC-MRI scans.
The multiple dose protocol with sequential DSC-MRI scans enables comparison of BTIP compliant and double-dose injections schemes."

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Histologic measures of tumor fraction
Time Frame: 1 day
Apply fractional tumor burden (FTB) rCBV thresholding methods to quantify recurrent tumor burden and compare this against histopathologic tumor burden from corresponding surgical specimens.
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determine the repeatability of rCBV measured with the consensus DSC-MRI protocol.
Time Frame: 1 week
"The repeatability of rCBV measured with the consensus DSC-MRI protocol will be quantified using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).
1 week
Determine overall survival (OS) in recurrent GBM patients.
Time Frame: 3 years
follow up for up to 3 years post enrollment
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chad Quarles, PhD, Barrow Neurological Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 17, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glioblastoma Multiforme

Clinical Trials on DSC-MRI

Subscribe