Evaluation of Morbidity and Mortality Associated With Dysphagia in Stroke Patients Based on Pharyngeal Residue Severity

February 15, 2018 updated by: Saint-Joseph University

Evaluation of Morbidity and Mortality Associated With Dysphagia in Stroke Patients Based on Pharyngeal Residue Severity: A Prospective Study

Specific objectives:

  • Evaluation of morbidity and mortality associated with the severity of pharyngeal residue in patients admitted to Hotêl-Dieu de France university hospital for Stroke based on the "The Yale pharyngeal residue scale"
  • Evaluation of the accuracy of screening protocol of Dysphagia at the Emergency Department in patients admitted for stoke based on the "Emergency Department Dysphagia Screening Tool"

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Dysphagia after stroke is common, affecting 27% to 64% of patients. Complications of dysphagia include aspiration leading to chest infection and pneumonia, malnutrition, inability to rehabilitate, increased risk of infection, prolonged length of stay in hospital, and an increased risk of death.

Deglutologists who use FEES have long lamented the fact that there was no reliable, validated, anatomically defined, image-based, and easily used pharyngeal residue severity rating scale. All that one had to rely on was the "impression" of residue severity, the definition of which varied from endoscopist to endoscopist In order for any scale to gain widespread acceptance, it must be user friendly, easy to learn, reliable to interpret, and generalizable to all patients undergoing FEES. Such a scale now exists, and it is the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale

Need for a trial: The relation between the severity of the pharyngeal residue and the risk of aspiration and subsequently the morbidity and mortality in stroke patients is not well defined yet.

Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the morbidity and mortality associated with the severity of pharyngeal residue in a specific population: stroke patients

Another objective of the study is to evaluate the accuracy of Emergency department (ED) dysphagia screening in stroke patients compared to a standard swallowing evaluation with FEES.

All patients admitted to Hotêl-Dieu de France university hospital for stroke will be evaluated for dysphagia using the ED dysphagia-screening tool. Preliminary data on the accuracy of the "ED dysphagia screening tool" are promising (Sensitivity of 96%)

In this study outcomes between 2 groups will be evaluated; (ED failed screening group and ED Screening passed group) and thus be able to validate results of previous studies concerning sensitivity and accuracy of the screening tool mentioned previously and finally to be able to identify stroke patients eligible for early oral nutrition.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18 years
  • Patients admitted for Stroke (Ischemic or hemorragic)
  • Patients reachable by phone call

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous history of major head and neck surgery
  • Previous or actual history of treatment by chemotherapy or radiotherapy for a head and neck neoplasm
  • Current Head and neck neoplasm
  • Previous or current history of esophageal carcinoma
  • Esophageal motility disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Dysphagia screening failed arm
Subjets within the this arm will have FEES with videotaping of pharyngeal phase after giving subjects a standardised food consisting of "thin Puree". An ENT resident blinded to the result of the screening test will do this intervention
Subjets within the two groups will after than have FEES with videotaping of pharyngeal phase after giving subjects a standardised food consisting of "thin Puree".
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Dysphagia screening passed arm
Subjets within the this arm will have FEES with videotaping of pharyngeal phase after giving subjects a standardised food consisting of "thin Puree". An ENT resident blinded to the result of the screening test will do this intervention
Subjets within the two groups will after than have FEES with videotaping of pharyngeal phase after giving subjects a standardised food consisting of "thin Puree".

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
incidence of Aspiration pnemonia
Time Frame: From date of inclusion till 1 year post inclusion in the study

Evaluation of aspiration pneumonia risk associated with the severity of pharyngeal residue in patients admitted to Hotêl-Dieu de France university hospital for Stroke based on the "The Yale pharyngeal residue scale".

The Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale can be used for both clinical advantages and research opportunities.

Clinically, clinicians can now accurately classify vallecula and pyriform sinus residue severity as none, trace, mild, moderate, or severe for diagnostic purposes, determination of functional therapeutic change, and evaluation of prognosis

From date of inclusion till 1 year post inclusion in the study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: HUSEIN SMAYLI, M.D, Hotêl-Dieu de France university hospital, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 22, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 22, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dysphagia Following Cerebral Infarction

Clinical Trials on Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES)

3
Subscribe