Saliva Profiles in Children With Congenital Heart Disease

March 1, 2018 updated by: Mine Koruyucu, Istanbul University
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether there are relationships between the salivary oxidative stress status of children with CHD directly dental caries including gender, age, salivary flow rate, salivary pH, salivary buffering capacity and drug intake such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. If such relationships exist, they might be employed to patient caries -prevention treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Using heart failure medications may cause low salivary pH and buffering capacity.As improved oral health is a priority for cardiac patients, it is necessary that they attend dental clinics for regular follow up.

This cross sectional study was carried out with 42 CHD and 42 healthy children who applied to Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics. Gender, age, general health and medications, and caries scores (dfs/DMFS) were recorded. Unstimulated saliva was collected from the participants and were assessed for the salivary secretion rate, salivary buffering capacity, pH, protein levels, superoxide dismutase (SOD), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), protein carbonyl, protein thiols, total sialic acid.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 3-12 years
  • Caridac problems

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other ages
  • syndromes
  • other systemic diseases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: congenital heart disease
42 patients
salivary secretion rate, salivary buffering capacity, pH, protein levels, superoxide dismutase (SOD), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), protein carbonyl, protein thiols, total sialic acid.
Other: helathy children
42 children
salivary secretion rate, salivary buffering capacity, pH, protein levels, superoxide dismutase (SOD), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), protein carbonyl, protein thiols, total sialic acid.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
salivary secretion rate
Time Frame: 2 hour
salivary secretion rate
2 hour
salivary buffering capacity
Time Frame: 2 hour
salivary buffering capacity
2 hour
pH
Time Frame: 2 hour
pH
2 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
protein levels of saliva
Time Frame: 2 hour
protein levels
2 hour
superoxide dismutase (SOD)
Time Frame: 2 hour
superoxide dismutase (SOD)
2 hour
ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP)
Time Frame: 2 hour
ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP)
2 hour
the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS)
Time Frame: 2 hour
the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS)
2 hour

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
protein carbonyl
Time Frame: 2 hour
protein carbonyl
2 hour
protein thiols
Time Frame: 2 hour
protein thiols
2 hour
total sialic acid
Time Frame: 2 hour
total sialic acid
2 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Caries

Clinical Trials on saliva

3
Subscribe