A Study for Identification of Predictive Immune Biomarker in Peripheral Blood for Nivolumab Therapy in NSCLC Patients

October 14, 2020 updated by: Yonsei University

The study aimed to elucidate predictive immune related biomarker to the responsiveness to the PD-1 blockade and evaluate the dynamics of immune cells in peripheral blood from NSCLC patients during nivolumab treatment.

Hypothesis that The ratio of MDSC after 1st or 2nd cycle can predict the response to nivolumab in NSCLC patients earlier than the tumor assessment by imaging scan.

The primary objective is to determine whether myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) ratio after 1st or 2nd cycle of nivolumab can be accurate predictive biomarkers of nivolumab in advanced NSCLC.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer related mortality worldwide. Immune checkpoint blockade has emerged as a promising treatment modality in NSCLC. More recently, Programmed Cell Death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor was approved by FDA as ≥ second line treatment, which are major paradigm shift in NSCLC treatment.

Subsequently two randomized phase III trials, comparing the overall survival (OS) of nivolumab with that of docetaxel as second line therapy, were completed. CheckMate-017 included squamous cell lung cancer patients and CheckMate-057 did non-squamous cell lung cancer patients. In both trials, nivolumab showed improvement of OS in all-comers regardless of PD-L1 expression. As a result of retrospective analysis, PD-L1 positivity was not predictive factor for the efficacy in squamous cell histology, but predictive factor for non-squamous histology. Finally, nivolumab was approved the all-comer NSCLC patients regardless of PD-L1 expression after failure to platinum based chemotherapy.

Although tumor PD-L1 expression is currently the best predictive biomarker for PD-1 blockades, the prediction accuracy is not high enough to solidify the drug efficacy. Actually, PD-L1 negative patients can still respond to PD-1 blockades and some of PD-L1 positive patients do not respond to these therapy. Interestingly, the responders among PD-L1 negative patients showed comparable duration of response in those with PD-L1 positive in Checkmate 057 trial.

Therefore, we need to select patients who are most likely to benefit from anti-PD-1 therapy and identify the better biomarker to predict the response to PD-1 blockades in NSCLC patients earlier than tumor assessment by imaging scan. To maximize the benefit of nivolumab in NSCLC patients, nivolumab should apply to all-comers, but we need to early decide to go or stop depending on predictive biomarker after 1st or 2nd cycle.

It is well known that various immune suppressive mechanisms including an accumulation and activation of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and regulatory T cells (Tregs) exist in tumor microenvironment of cancer patients. MDSC are one of the major components of the tumor microenvironment, demonstrating their potentials, such as tumor progression by promoting tumor cell survival, angiogenesis, invasion of healthy tissue by tumor cells, and metastases. Recent studies show that MDSC as a heterogenous group of myeloid progenitors with immuno suppressive function could be used as one of the promising biomarker candidate for cancer immunotherapies. Ipilimumab could affect the immune cells in peripheral blood from melanoma patients. This study demonstrated that responder to ipilimumab showed early increase of eosinophil counts, whereas non-responders presented that elevated monocytic MDSC increased serum levels of S100A8/A9 and HMGB1 that attract and activate MDSCs. This result suggests that measurement of MDSCs could be a predictive immune related biomarker to ipilimumab treatment. On the other hand, we do not know how PD-1 blockade affects the immune suppressive cells such as MDSC or Tregs and makes difference between responder and non-responder.

Recently, we conducted pilot trial to compare the T lymphocytes and MDSC population in peripheral blood between responder and non-responder to nivolumab. Interestingly, our preliminary data demonstrated that after 1st cycle of the therapy CD11b+CD33+MDSC/CD45+ or CD14- ratio has significantly decreased in responder compared to non-responder. The cut-off value of peripheral MDSC ratio could be reliable biomarker for accurate prediction of nivolumab therapy in NSCLC patients. To validate our finding, we need to expand this study in NSCLC patients who will be treated with nivolumab.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Korea
      • Seoul, Korea, Korea, Republic of, 03722
        • Department of Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The sample size is not based on statistical consideration. This is pilot study designed to explore biomarker to early predict the response to nivolumab in NSCLC. We decided to 60 subjects considering feasibility.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age≥ 18 years old.
  • Histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC
  • Metastatic or recurrent stage
  • Failed to previous platinum based chemotherapy
  • Performance status of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 to 1.
  • Adequate organ function
  • At least one measurable lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic or uncontrolled brain metastasis
  • History of autoimmune disease
  • Other primary cancer within 3 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MDSC markers
Time Frame: change from baseline blood biomarker at 6 weeks or progression
CD11b, Gr11b,
change from baseline blood biomarker at 6 weeks or progression
Changes of Tregs markers
Time Frame: A) Within 7 days before treatment (Pre-treatment) B) Every 2 weeks of treatment up to 3 cycles (every cycle is 2 weeks)C) Within 28 days after progression (post-treatment)
FOXP3, CD25, CD127, CD45RA
A) Within 7 days before treatment (Pre-treatment) B) Every 2 weeks of treatment up to 3 cycles (every cycle is 2 weeks)C) Within 28 days after progression (post-treatment)
T cell/NK cell marker
Time Frame: A) Within 7 days before treatment (Pre-treatment) B) Every 2 weeks of treatment up to 3 cycles (every cycle is 2 weeks)C) Within 28 days after progression (post-treatment)
CD3, CD4, CD8, FoxP3, CD56
A) Within 7 days before treatment (Pre-treatment) B) Every 2 weeks of treatment up to 3 cycles (every cycle is 2 weeks)C) Within 28 days after progression (post-treatment)
Immune checkpoint molecules
Time Frame: A) Within 7 days before treatment (Pre-treatment) B) Every 2 weeks of treatment up to 3 cycles (every cycle is 2 weeks)C) Within 28 days after progression (post-treatment)
PD-1, LAG-3, TIGIT etc.
A) Within 7 days before treatment (Pre-treatment) B) Every 2 weeks of treatment up to 3 cycles (every cycle is 2 weeks)C) Within 28 days after progression (post-treatment)
serum levels of S100A8/A9
Time Frame: A) Within 7 days before treatment (Pre-treatment) B) Every 2 weeks of treatment up to 3 cycles (every cycle is 2 weeks)C) Within 28 days after progression (post-treatment)
A) Within 7 days before treatment (Pre-treatment) B) Every 2 weeks of treatment up to 3 cycles (every cycle is 2 weeks)C) Within 28 days after progression (post-treatment)
HMGB1
Time Frame: A) Within 7 days before treatment (Pre-treatment) B) Every 2 weeks of treatment up to 3 cycles (every cycle is 2 weeks)C) Within 28 days after progression (post-treatment)
A) Within 7 days before treatment (Pre-treatment) B) Every 2 weeks of treatment up to 3 cycles (every cycle is 2 weeks)C) Within 28 days after progression (post-treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ORR(Objective response rate)
Time Frame: every 6 months up to 5years.
every 6 months up to 5years.
PFS (progression free survival)
Time Frame: every 6 months up to 5years.
every 6 months up to 5years.
OS (overall survival)
Time Frame: every 6 months up to 5years.
Overall survival will be followed continuously while subjects are on the study drug and every 6 months after discontinuation or progression for up to 5 years.
every 6 months up to 5years.
Adverse Event
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Adverse Events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 5, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 7, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 7, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non -Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on nivolumab

Subscribe