A 14 Weeks Longitudinal Study to Investigate the Effect of Leukocyte- Platelet Rich Fibrin Plug on the Quality of the Newly Formed Bone in Ridge Preservation Procedure Following a Tooth Extraction. It is a Clinical, Radiographic and Histomorphometric Study.

May 20, 2021 updated by: Firas Al Yafi

Ridge Preservation With Leukocyte Platelet Rich Fibrin: A Clinical, Radiographic, and Histomorphometric Study.

This 14 weeks longitudinal study will be conducted from March 2018 to June 2020, with a 40 participants. No subjects has received placebo medication at any point in the research procedures.

Null hypothesis: The use of L-PRF plug, in combination with non-resorbable, open barrier membrane technique to fill the extraction sockets will have no effect on the quality of the newly formed bone nor on the dimensional changes of the ridge, compared to non-resorbable, open barrier membrane technique with natural blood clot.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This 14 weeks longitudinal study was conducted from March 2018 to June 2020, with a 27 participants. No subjects has received placebo medication at any point in the research procedures.

The proposed sample population has been recruited from the patient population of the University of Kentucky College of Dentistry clinics and the patient must have had an unsalvageable tooth that was planned for extraction and delayed implant placement and was assigned into a control group and a test group by chance. Fifteen extraction socket sites of the test group were filled with autogenous L-PRF Plug (Intralock) and d-PTFE membrane (Cytoplast) was laid on the top to seal the extraction socket. In the control group, d-PTFE membrane (Cytoplast) was laid on the top of twelve extraction sockets to allow natural blood clot formation in the extraction socket.

The primary aim is to assess the quality of the newly formed bone at 14 weeks the time of implant placement by comparing the percentage of new vital bone in the histomorphometric analysis. The second aim was to assess the horizontal and vertical changes of the residual bony ridge using Cone Bean Computerized Tomography (CBCT) analysis at baseline immediately after tooth extraction at 12 weeks of healing.

Null hypothesis: The use of L-PRF plug, in combination with non-resorbable, open barrier membrane technique to fill the extraction sockets will have no effect on the quality of the newly formed bone nor on the dimensional changes of the ridge, compared to non-resorbable, open barrier membrane technique with natural blood clot.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40536
        • Univerisity of Kentucky College of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The subject must have an unsalvageable tooth that is planned for extraction and delayed implant placement.
  • The tooth should be free of acute odontogenic infections.
  • Extraction sockets with minimal to moderate bony defect.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient who is planned for full mouth extraction.
  • Heavy smoker (more than 10 cigarettes a day).
  • History of malignancy, chemotherapy, radiation therapy.
  • Immunosuppressive disease.
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease.
  • Any contraindications to surgical procedures.
  • Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • For multi-rooted teeth, if the most coronal part of the interradicular septum is less than 5 mm below the crest of the bone.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group
Under the effect of local anesthetic tooth will be extracted then a d-PTFE membrane will be used to cover the socket without any bone graft material to preserve the ridge.
Following tooth extraction, the socket will be covered with a d-PTFE membrane
Other Names:
  • Cytoplast
Experimental: Test group
Under the effect of local anesthetic tooth extraction will be followed by the collection of about 50 ml of the patient's venous blood, then without adding any anticougulant the blood will be spun to make a plug. The Leukocyte platelet rich fibrin plug + d-PTFE membrane will be used to preserve the ridge.
Following tooth extraction, an autologous leukocyte platelet rich fibrin plug will be placed in the socket and covered with a d-PTFE membrane

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of the Newly Formed Bone
Time Frame: The bone sample was harvested at 14 weeks from the baseline visit (extraction of tooth).
Histomorphometric analysis will be performed on a bone core sample harvested at the time of implant placement.
The bone sample was harvested at 14 weeks from the baseline visit (extraction of tooth).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dimensional Changes of the Alveolar Ridge (Ridge Width)
Time Frame: The baseline CBCT after tooth extraction and 12 weeks CBCT after extraction.
Two Cone Bean Computerized Tomography (CBCT) measurements were compared to perform the analysis.
The baseline CBCT after tooth extraction and 12 weeks CBCT after extraction.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mhdfiras Al Yafi, DDS, University of Kentucky College of Dentistry

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 26, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 17-0815-F2L

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tooth Extraction

Clinical Trials on d-PTFE membrane

3
Subscribe