Gingival Displacement by Polytetrafluoroethylene & Conventional Retraction Cord

April 10, 2021 updated by: Humera Nasim, Dow University of Health Sciences

Comparative Evaluation of Gingival Displacement by Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) & Conventional Retraction Cord- A Randomized Control Trial

To achieve harmony between restoration and surrounding periodontium, soft tissue management plays a pivotal role. Various Gingival displacement techniques show varying results in achieving the goals of displacement. The most preferred method of displacement by dental practitioners is through conventional retraction cord made up of cotton, which besides its advantages, poses certain drawbacks, including low tear strength, high friction, and fiber remnants within the sulcus.

Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) retraction cord, is a fluoropolymer, known for its high tear strength, low friction, and bio-compatibility.

This study aims to determine the difference of horizontal gingival displacement between PTFE and conventional retraction cord.

Participants inducted in this study will be assessed for eligibility. qualifying subjects will receive crown preparation for Porcelain-fused to-metal crown. subjects will then be randomly allocated to either of the two arms of intervention. After making a pre-displacement impression, Retraction cord will be applied for 3 minutes, then removed to record post-displacement impression.

the difference in pre and post-displacement mean gingival sulcus width will be assessed by a stereomicroscope using image analysis software.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sindh
      • Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 75600
        • Dow University of Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indication of full veneer crown

    • Age group: 18-60 years
    • Probing Depth 2-3mm and no bleeding on probing
    • No signs of gingival/periodontal disease

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Indication of subgingival margin location

    • Developmental anomaly (anatomical) affecting abutment tooth
    • Bleeding disorder
    • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional Retraction Cord
Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Retraction cord will be gently applied in gingival sulcus with minimal pressure. The intervention will be applied for three minutes in gingival sulcus, followed by a two stage addition silicone impression.
Experimental: PTFE Retraction Cord
Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Retraction cord will be gently applied in gingival sulcus with minimal pressure. The intervention will be applied for three minutes in gingival sulcus, followed by a two stage addition silicone impression.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Difference between Mean Horizontal Gingival Displacement by PTFE retraction cord and Conventional retraction cord among sixty participants as assessed by Stereomicroscope.
Time Frame: 3 minutes after displacement
3 minutes after displacement

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Difference between Post-displacement Bleeding by PTFE and conventional retraction cord among sixty participants by visual assessment
Time Frame: immediately after cord removal
immediately after cord removal
Difference between ease of Application of PTFE and conventional retraction cord among sixty participants.
Time Frame: immediately after cord removal
immediately after cord removal

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingival Pocket

Clinical Trials on PTFE Retraction Cord

Subscribe