Evaluation of Periodontal Ligament Distraction Using a Modified Surgical Technique for Retraction of Maxillary Canines ([PLD])

May 23, 2018 updated by: Monaser Mobarak, Cairo University

Evaluation of Periodontal Ligament Distraction Using a Modified Surgical Technique for Retraction of Maxillary Canines in Adult Patients (Split-mouth Randomized Clinical Trial)

Surgical modification technique try to get bodily movement during upper canine retraction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

I- Original surgical technique (Liou and Huang technique, 1998) :

On the conventional surgical side, (the control side), the intersepital bone was undermined by two vertical cuts on the mesio-buccal and mesio-palatal line angles of the first premolar socket. They were connected at the base of the socket by an oblique cut. The surgical round bur was held parallel to the long axis of the canine and moved buccolingually, while shaving the interseptal bone buccolingual (back-and-forth) shaving movements were reduced the thickness of the interseptal bone by approximately 1 mm

II- Modified surgical technique:

In the surgical modification side, (the experimental side), intra-alveolar mesio-buccal and mesio-palatal cuts and interseptal bone shaving were done by surgical round bur and copious irrigation, without the oblique cut since it was done blindly in the original surgical technique. A buccal semilunar flap was opened on the apical area of canine-premolar region. The surgical pin helped also in location of the point of initial drilling of the apical horizontal cut from buccal approach, when the surgical pin's socket arm rested on the depth of the socket, the vestibular arm marked the point of access. It also estimated mesiodeistal extension of the apical horizontal cut. The apical horizontal cut was started from the socket apex to half way of the interseptal bone mesiodistally as an extension and for the depth, Mallet and Chisel were used from the cortical bone to reach the mesio-palatal cut. The flap was sutured. This surgical modification step provided more predictability and safer surgery than the blind oblique cut in the original surgical technique.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11111
        • Cairo University - Orthodontic department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 25 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Orthodontic patients needed extraction of upper first premolars, with age range from 18 - 25 years old.
  2. All patients were medically free. (See Appendix II)
  3. No previous orthodontic treatment.
  4. Adequate oral hygiene and periodontally healthy teeth.
  5. The canines were almost leveled and aligned.
  6. Maximum anchorage requirements.
  7. Healthy canines; no deep carious lesions, no endodontic lesions, no root canal treatment, nor internal or external root resorption.
  8. All patients were informed of the procedure and signed the consents.

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects were excluded from the study when:

  1. They failed to keep several consecutive appointments.
  2. Oral hygiene was subjectively judged as deteriorating during the preliminary stages of patient preparation.
  3. Compliance with the instructions provided was inadequate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Surgical modification side
Periodontal ligament distraction without the oblique cuts but with apical horizontal cut
decrease the bony resistant during canine retration
Other Names:
  • Acceleration of canine retraction
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Conventional surgery
Periodontal ligament distraction
decrease the bony resistant during canine retration
Other Names:
  • Acceleration of canine retraction

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tipping of the canines
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
  1. Periapical radiograph using Parallel technique (X-ray sensor , X-ray sensor holder & Potable dental x-ray unit
  2. Panoramic radiograph .
3-4 weeks
Rate of canines retraction
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
Digital models using 3shape scanner and Ortho-Analyzer software
3-4 weeks
Rotation of the canines
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
Digital models using 3shape scanner and Ortho-Analyzer software
3-4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Amount of anchorage loss
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
Digital models using 3shape scanner and Ortho-Analyzer software
3-4 weeks
Tipping of the molars
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
  1. Periapical radiograph using Parallel technique (X-ray sensor , X-ray sensor holder & Potable dental x-ray unit
  2. Panoramic radiograph.
3-4 weeks
The apical root resorption scores
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
Periapical radiograph using Parallel technique (x-ray sensor, X-ray sensor holder & Potable dental x-ray unit
3-4 weeks
Pulp Vitality
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
Cold application (Ethyl Chloride)
3-4 weeks
Gingival index
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
Periodontal probe
3-4 weeks
Periodontal index
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
Periodontal probe
3-4 weeks
Pain
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
Numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain
3-4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Monaser M Elashik, Master, Cairo University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 15, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 15, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 15, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 24, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 25, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 11111 (DAIDS ES Registry Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Orthodontic Appliance Complication

Clinical Trials on Periodontal ligament distraction

Subscribe