- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03535285
Evaluation of Periodontal Ligament Distraction Using a Modified Surgical Technique for Retraction of Maxillary Canines ([PLD])
Evaluation of Periodontal Ligament Distraction Using a Modified Surgical Technique for Retraction of Maxillary Canines in Adult Patients (Split-mouth Randomized Clinical Trial)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
I- Original surgical technique (Liou and Huang technique, 1998) :
On the conventional surgical side, (the control side), the intersepital bone was undermined by two vertical cuts on the mesio-buccal and mesio-palatal line angles of the first premolar socket. They were connected at the base of the socket by an oblique cut. The surgical round bur was held parallel to the long axis of the canine and moved buccolingually, while shaving the interseptal bone buccolingual (back-and-forth) shaving movements were reduced the thickness of the interseptal bone by approximately 1 mm
II- Modified surgical technique:
In the surgical modification side, (the experimental side), intra-alveolar mesio-buccal and mesio-palatal cuts and interseptal bone shaving were done by surgical round bur and copious irrigation, without the oblique cut since it was done blindly in the original surgical technique. A buccal semilunar flap was opened on the apical area of canine-premolar region. The surgical pin helped also in location of the point of initial drilling of the apical horizontal cut from buccal approach, when the surgical pin's socket arm rested on the depth of the socket, the vestibular arm marked the point of access. It also estimated mesiodeistal extension of the apical horizontal cut. The apical horizontal cut was started from the socket apex to half way of the interseptal bone mesiodistally as an extension and for the depth, Mallet and Chisel were used from the cortical bone to reach the mesio-palatal cut. The flap was sutured. This surgical modification step provided more predictability and safer surgery than the blind oblique cut in the original surgical technique.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt, 11111
- Cairo University - Orthodontic department
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Orthodontic patients needed extraction of upper first premolars, with age range from 18 - 25 years old.
- All patients were medically free. (See Appendix II)
- No previous orthodontic treatment.
- Adequate oral hygiene and periodontally healthy teeth.
- The canines were almost leveled and aligned.
- Maximum anchorage requirements.
- Healthy canines; no deep carious lesions, no endodontic lesions, no root canal treatment, nor internal or external root resorption.
- All patients were informed of the procedure and signed the consents.
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria
Subjects were excluded from the study when:
- They failed to keep several consecutive appointments.
- Oral hygiene was subjectively judged as deteriorating during the preliminary stages of patient preparation.
- Compliance with the instructions provided was inadequate.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Surgical modification side
Periodontal ligament distraction without the oblique cuts but with apical horizontal cut
|
decrease the bony resistant during canine retration
Other Names:
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Conventional surgery
Periodontal ligament distraction
|
decrease the bony resistant during canine retration
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Tipping of the canines
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
|
|
3-4 weeks
|
|
Rate of canines retraction
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
|
Digital models using 3shape scanner and Ortho-Analyzer software
|
3-4 weeks
|
|
Rotation of the canines
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
|
Digital models using 3shape scanner and Ortho-Analyzer software
|
3-4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Amount of anchorage loss
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
|
Digital models using 3shape scanner and Ortho-Analyzer software
|
3-4 weeks
|
|
Tipping of the molars
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
|
|
3-4 weeks
|
|
The apical root resorption scores
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
|
Periapical radiograph using Parallel technique (x-ray sensor, X-ray sensor holder & Potable dental x-ray unit
|
3-4 weeks
|
|
Pulp Vitality
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
|
Cold application (Ethyl Chloride)
|
3-4 weeks
|
|
Gingival index
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
|
Periodontal probe
|
3-4 weeks
|
|
Periodontal index
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
|
Periodontal probe
|
3-4 weeks
|
|
Pain
Time Frame: 3-4 weeks
|
Numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain
|
3-4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Monaser M Elashik, Master, Cairo University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 11111 (DAIDS ES Registry Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Orthodontic Appliance Complication
-
King Abdulaziz UniversityRecruitingOrthodontic Appliance Complication | Orthodontic Appliance Design | Orthodontic TreatmentSaudi Arabia
-
Al-Azhar UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingOrthodontic Appliance ComplicationEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedOrthodontic Appliance ComplicationEgypt
-
China Medical University HospitalCompletedOrthodontic Appliance ComplicationTaiwan
-
mohamed abdelmotalebCairo UniversityCompletedOrthodontic Appliance Complication
-
Ammar AlubaydiCompleted
-
Rehman Medical Institute - RMICompletedOrthodontic Appliance ComplicationPakistan
-
University of PaviaCompletedOrthodontic Appliance ComplicationItaly
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedOrthodontic Appliance ComplicationSyrian Arab Republic
Clinical Trials on Periodontal ligament distraction
-
Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityCompletedDental Anxiety | Virtual Reality | Oral SurgeryTurkey
-
OrganTech, Inc.RecruitingDental Caries | Tooth Extraction | Tooth Fractures | Tooth DislocationJapan
-
Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences UniversityNot yet recruitingDental Anxiety | Dental Pain | Behavioral Management
-
Dicle UniversityRecruitingPain | Dental Anxiety | Dental FearTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaCompletedPain | Anxiety | FearTurkey
-
Izmir Tinaztepe UniversityCompletedPostoperative Pain | Total Knee ArthroplastyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
St. Justine's HospitalShriners Hospitals for Children; Montreal Children's Hospital of the MUHCCompletedPain | Stress | Anxiety | Pain Management | Virtual Reality | Pain Perception | Catastrophizing, PainCanada
-
Universitat Internacional de CatalunyaCompletedDisruptive Global Behavior During Previous Treatment VisitsSpain
-
University of ChicagoCompletedPain ResponseUnited States
-
Istanbul UniversityIstanbul Technical UniversityCompleted