Clinical Assessment and Thickness Changes of the Oblique and Multifidus Muscles

September 3, 2020 updated by: Brian Catania, Christiana Care Health Services

Clinical Assessment and Thickness Changes of the Oblique and Multifidus Muscles Using a Novel Screening Tool and Exercise Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study evaluates the effect of a rotation based exercise program on core muscle thickness. Additionally, a second aim is to demonstrate the ability of a clinical assessment tool to identify muscle thickness changes. Half of participants receive the rotation based exercises, while the other half perform a traditional core exercise program. It was hypothesized that the rotation based exercises would result in greater changes in muscle thickness.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

A number of exercise programs and assessment tools have been evaluated for their ability to influence and measure the core muscles. Inefficient stability and asymmetrical muscle activity of the core have been linked to a wide range of lower extremity injuries. Training of the abdominal muscles to obtain symmetrical recruitment for optimal trunk stabilization is a widespread clinical practice, however valid and reliable assessment tools and effective intervention protocols are lacking. This study uniquely uses both a clinical assessment tool and musculoskeletal ultrasound to measure changes in the core muscles following an exercise intervention. The overall purpose of this study was to design a valid and reliable assessment tool and an effective training protocol to activate the core muscles.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

31

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Delaware
      • Newark, Delaware, United States, 19702
        • University of Delaware

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

° Undergraduate and graduate subjects from the University of the Delaware student community.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • You could be excluded if you have recently undergone surgery in the last 6 months.
  • Currently suffering from low back pain.
  • Or have a history of a neurological condition.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SCREENING
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Rotation Exercises
8 minute program of rotation based exercises
The subjects received 7 trunk rotation stability exercises x 10 reps each
Other Names:
  • Sling Activation Session
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control Exercises
8 minute program of traditional exercises
The subjects received 7 traditional exercises x 10 reps each
Other Names:
  • Traditional

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Muscle Thickness
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 minutes post intervention
Musculoskeletal ultrasound measured changes in muscle thickness
Baseline and 10 minutes post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Clinical Muscle Assessment Using the Novel Sling Screen
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 minutes post intervention

Clinician based assessment of muscle function using the sling screen tool; Kappa coefficients were calculated to examine agreement between the 2 physical therapists that completed the sling screen assessments and to account for chance effects in scoring.

A rating system was used for scoring performance. Min value on the scale is 2 and max value = 5; higher score is a better outcome.

Baseline and 10 minutes post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Andrea DiTrani, PhD, ATC, Neumann University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 25, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 25, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 25, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DDD# 602910

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Abdominal Muscles

Clinical Trials on Rotation Exercises

3
Subscribe