Effect of Alveolar Bone Grafting

February 4, 2019 updated by: Kevser Sancak, Ankara University

Effect of Alveolar Bone Grafting on Health Quality in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate

This study included patients who underwent secondary alveolar bone grafting by harvesting graft from the anterior iliac crest, in Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Turkey, during the period from January 2012 to March 2016. All patients were operated using the same technique and by the same surgical team. Patients will be interviewed to fill Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) and Postsurgical Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSPSQ) 6 months postoperatively. The questionnaires will be used to assess the relationship between health quality and patient satisfaction. Also, grafted sites will be evaluated with respect to fistula, the presence of cleft palate, and infection.The descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation analyses will be made using PSPSQ scores and SF-12 PCS and MCS scores.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The postsurgical patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSPSQ) was designed to assess each patient's overall satisfaction with the procedure(s), functional improvements, and recognized or perceived negative effects of the procedures. One of the most commonly used measures of HRQoL is SF-36, which has been reduced to 12 items with the minimal loss of information to form SF-12 . HRQoL was assessed using SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06500
        • Ankara University dentisry of faculty

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients who underwent surgery due to alveolar cleft

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

patients who were undergone alveolar cleft surgery before at our hospital at least 6 months after surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

patients who don't accept to join questionnaire

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Summary
Time Frame: 20 minutes
all participants will be called to faculty. SF-12 will be done. SF-12 is calculated using the scoring table. Health-related quality of life, which was measured using the Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores of SF-12 was assessed. Physical component is scored from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the worst and 100 representing the best health status.
20 minutes
Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental Component Summary
Time Frame: 20 minutes
all participants will be called to faculty. SF-12 will be done. SF-12 is calculated using the scoring table. Health-related quality of life, which was measured using the Mental Component Summary (MCS)scores of SF-12 was assessed. Mental component is scored from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the worst and 100 representing the best health status.
20 minutes
Postsurgical Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSPSQ)
Time Frame: 20 minutes
all participants will be called to faculty. PSPSQ will be done. Patient satisfaction will be assessed by analyzing data gathered from PSPSQ. PSPSQ included seven questions. It is designed to assess each patient's overall satisfaction with the procedure(s), functional improvements, and recognized or perceived negative effects of the procedures. The 7-point Likert (poor to excellent), scale is used so that the person who answers the questions can rate the level of related satisfaction with each question. The final outcome is between 7 and 49. Higher scores are associated with satisfaction.
20 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Kevser Sancak, Ankara University Faculty of Dentısry

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 30, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 36290600/22

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

de-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

3
Subscribe