POst Stroke Intervention Trial In Fatigue (POSITIF) (POSITIF)

June 20, 2018 updated by: University of Edinburgh

POst Stroke Intervention Trial in Fatigue: A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Brief Intervention for Post-stroke Fatigue

The purpose of this study is to assess whether a brief cognitive behavioural intervention for post-stroke fatigue leads to clinically relevant improvements in fatigue after 6 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Primary Objective

Does a brief cognitive behavioural intervention for post-stroke fatigue lead to clinically relevant improvements in fatigue after 6 months? Fatigue will be assessed using the self-reported Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) which has been validated for use in stroke (14). This scale includes both mental and physical fatigue. Our data shows that a difference of approximately 5 points in FAS was associated with a clinically significant difference in people with stroke (15); the literature on stroke patients suggests that a difference in four points on the scale is considered to be 'clinically relevant'. We are conservatively basing our power calculations on a difference between groups of four points in the FAS.

Secondary Objectives

  • Does the intervention improve fatigue at 4 months (i.e. immediately after the end of the intervention)?
  • Does the intervention improve self-reported mood at 4 months and 6 months? This will be assessed using Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (16) and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD7) (17). At 6 months we will also enquire whether antidepressants or anxiolytics have been prescribed.
  • Does the intervention improve stroke specific quality of life including patient reported social participation? This will be assessed using the Modified Short Form of the Stroke Impact Scale (18).
  • What is the cost of the intervention, and what is the quality of life adjusted life years (QUALYS)? To assess QUALYS, we will use the Euroquol 5D (5 level version) (21).
  • Has the patient returned to work? If so are they working the same hours as prestroke?

Endpoints

Primary Endpoint

The primary outcome is the Fatigue Assessment Scale (19) at 6 months after randomisation. The FAS is a 10-item self-report scale with 10 statements about different aspects of fatigue, each rated from 1 to 5 (1, never; 2, sometimes; 3, regularly; 4, often; and 5, always). It is valid and reliable in stroke(14). A higher score indicates more fatigue. A difference of four points is considered to be clinically relevant.

Secondary Endpoints

To answer our secondary objectives, we will collect the following outcome measures

  • PHQ-9 and GAD-7 (4 months and 6 months after randomisation).
  • Modified Short Form of the Stroke Impact Scale (6 months after randomisation) (18).
  • At 4 months and 6 months after randomisation: The EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) to provide an overall measure of health related quality of life (HRQOL) and to allow a health economic analysis based on quality adjusted life years ((20)). As repeated measures of the EQ-5D-5L are required for assessment of QUALYS; this will be done at baseline, 4 months and 6 months.
  • Health costs (Between randomisation and 6 months) For this health economic analysis, we will collect data on costs (visits to the GP, number of admissions to hospital, days in a care home, number of visits from social carers, cost of the therapist delivery time, cost of the supervision time from psychology/psychiatry). This will enable us to perform a health economic analysis which will tell us how much the intervention costs, whether there are savings in usage of health/social care, and what QUALYS are associated with the intervention.
  • We will ask the patient to list their medication. We will note any new prescriptions of anxiolytics or antidepressants

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Stroke 3 months to 2 years previously. Both ischaemic and haemorrhagic, including subarachnoid haemorrhage
  • Capacity to consent
  • Not living in nursing home.
  • Medically stable,
  • Answers 'Yes' to both the following questions about fatigue

    • 'Do you feel tired all the time or get tired very quickly since your stroke'?
    • Would you like additional help and support for this?

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unlikely to be available for follow-up for the next 6 months e.g. no fixed home address
  • Other life-threatening illness (e.g. advanced cancer or advanced heart failure) that will make survival for 6 months unlikely
  • Aphasia or cognitive impairment which is severe enough to prevent participation in the intervention. To assess this, patients will self-report their language and cognition from the relevant domains in the Short Stroke Impact Scale ('In the past week, how difficult was it for you to think quickly?' and 'In the past week, how difficult was it to understand what was being said to you in a conversation?') Those who respond 'very difficult' or 'could not do at all' to either question will be excluded. (24). Those who might be in these categories are likely to be unable to complete the form(s) and thus self-select to decline to return the paperwork.
  • Actively suicidal, requiring in-patient treatment for depression, depression related cognitive impairment. (see below)
  • High anxiety as part of a post-traumatic stress disorder syndrome or panic disorder (see below)
  • Previously enrolled in this trial
  • Enrolled in another talking therapy trial
  • Inability to understand spoken and/or written English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention plus information
Participants in this arm will receive 6 telephone therapy sessions and 1 booster session. Participants will be followed up at 4 months and 6 months.
The intervention will include six sessions with a therapist, each separated by two weeks. During the two weeks between sessions, participants will work on the goals identified during the sessions. At the final session, the participants will agree how to maintain any improvements in fatigue. Then there will be a review phone call about 4-6 weeks after completion of the intervention, to check on progress and to offer ongoing encouragement to continue with the changes that have been made during the intervention. The intervention can be delivered by video conferencing as well as by phone.
Other: Information only
Participants in this arm will receive information only. Participants will be followed up at 4 months and 6 months.
Participants in this arm will be provided with information about fatigue.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS)
Time Frame: 6 months after randomisation
The FAS is a 10-item self-report scale with 10 statements about different aspects of fatigue, each rated from 1 to 5 (1, never; 2, sometimes; 3, regularly; 4, often; and 5, always). It is valid and reliable in stroke. A higher score indicates more fatigue. A difference of four points is considered to be clinically relevant.
6 months after randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PHQ-9
Time Frame: 4 months and 6 months after randomisation
Questionnaire
4 months and 6 months after randomisation
GAD-7
Time Frame: 4 months and 6 months after randomisation
Questionnaire
4 months and 6 months after randomisation
Modified Short Form of the Stroke Impact Scale
Time Frame: 6 months after randomisation
Questionnaire
6 months after randomisation
EuroQuol (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months and 6 months after randomisation
Questionnaire
Baseline, 4 months and 6 months after randomisation
Health costs
Time Frame: Between randomisation and 6 months
For this health economic analysis, we will collect data on costs (visits to the GP, number of admissions to hospital, days in a care home, number of visits from social carers, cost of the therapist delivery time, cost of the supervision time from psychology/psychiatry).
Between randomisation and 6 months
List of patient's medication
Time Frame: Between randomisation and 6 months
We will ask the patient to list their medication. We will note any new prescriptions of anxiolytics or antidepressants
Between randomisation and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gillian Mead, MB BChir MA MD FRCP, University of Edinburgh

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

August 6, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-stroke Fatigue

Clinical Trials on Experimental: Intervention plus information

3
Subscribe