Treating Contact Lens Discomfort With Orthokeratology

August 13, 2020 updated by: Andrew Pucker, University of Alabama at Birmingham
The primary aim of this study is to understand if orthokeratology can be used to improve contact lens comfort and the secondary aim is understand patient adaptation to orthokeratology.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Orthokeratology has yet to be fully explored for the treatment of contact lens discomfort (CLD), though some support for this practice exists in the literature. Carracedo et al., Lipson et al., and Garcia-Porta et al. found that orthokeratology resulted in better ocular comfort than soft contact lenses. Nevertheless, all three studies excluded subjects who had been diagnosed with dry eye and all three studies used symptoms surveys that were not specific to assessing CLD. Garcia-Porta et al.'s study was also limited by including both neophytes and established contact lens wearers. Yet, these studies overall suggest that orthokeratology could be used as a treatment for CLD, and one case report has even found that orthokeratology is a viable option for treating contact lens intolerance.

To date, there has yet to be a study fully investigating orthokeratology as an alternative to soft contact lens use in patients with CLD. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to formally investigate if orthokeratology is a good alternative to soft contact lenses for patients who are experiencing CLD or for patients who have dropped out of contact lenses because of CLD. This study will also simultaneously evaluate the neophyte orthokeratology wearing experience with hopes of finding additional means for improving contact lens comfort. Knowing the success of orthokeratology in wearers with CLD will allow practitioners to better help and prescribe for those who may have experienced or at risk for experiencing CLD. It may also be a way to allow patients additional years of contact lens wear.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A completed comprehensive eye exam within the past two years
  • Contact lens discomfort or discontinuation of contact lenses because of discomfort within the past 6 months
  • Able to wear the Emerald™ Contact Lens (Oprifocon A, Euclid Systems Corporation)
  • Refractive error better than -5.00 diopters with less than 1.50 diopters of cylinder
  • Keratometry values between 40.00 D and 46.00 D

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Past orthokeratology use
  • Ocular surgery within the past 12 months
  • History of severe ocular trauma
  • Active ocular infection or inflammation
  • Ocular disease other than dry eye
  • Accutane or ocular medication use
  • Pregnant or breast feeding
  • A condition or situation that may put the subject at significant risk, confound the study results, or may significantly interfere with study participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Orthokeratology Group
All subjects will be fit in orthokeratology contact lenses.
Orthokeratology is a type of contact lens that is worn over night to reduce refractive error, so patients do not need to wear vision correction during the day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Contact Lens Comfort
Time Frame: 1 Month Compared to Baseline
Contact lens comfort was measured with the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (Range = 0 to 28 with lower scores being better). Subjects were required to have Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8) scores of 12 or greater in order to participate in this study.
1 Month Compared to Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Contact Lens Comfort
Time Frame: 1 Week Compared to Baseline
Contact lens comfort was measured with the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-4 (Range = 0 to 18 with lower scores being better).
1 Week Compared to Baseline
Contact Lens Comfort
Time Frame: 3 Month Compared to Baseline
Eye comfort will be measured with the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-4 (Range = 0 to 18 with lower scores being better).
3 Month Compared to Baseline
Non-Invasive Tear Break-Up Time
Time Frame: 1 Month Compared to Baseline
This is a measure of tear stability (Measured in seconds with higher amounts of time being better).
1 Month Compared to Baseline
Tear Meniscus Height
Time Frame: 1 Month Compared to Baseline
This is a measure of tear volume (Measured in millimeters with higher heights being better).
1 Month Compared to Baseline
Phenol Red Thread
Time Frame: 1 Month Compared to Baseline
This is a measure of tear volume (Range = 0 to 75 millimeters with higher values being better).
1 Month Compared to Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 7, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 15, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 25, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OAN 000520524

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The data will be shared in aggregate as a published manuscript.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye

Clinical Trials on Orthokeratology

Subscribe