Piiloset Trehalose Emulsion Eye Drop Study in Moderate or Severe Dry Eye

November 22, 2019 updated by: Kai Kaarniranta, Kuopio University Hospital

A Randomized, Active-controlled, Parallel, Double-blind Study on the Safety, Ocular Tolerability and Efficacy of Piiloset Trehalose Emulsion Eye Drop in Adult Patients With Moderate or Severe Dry Eye

The study evaluates the safety, ocular tolerability and efficacy of emulsion eye drops with sacha inchi seed oil, trehalose and hyaluronic acid in the treatment of moderate or severe dry eye in adult patients. The investigative device is studied in comparison with control eye drops containing hyaluronic acid for up to 30 days.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

According to the current view on dry eye disease, tear film instability, tear film hyperosmolarity, and ocular surface inflammation and damage are identified as etiological factors. The first-line medicinal management options include ocular lubricants such as eye drops and sprays. Emulsion eye drops are a relatively recent entity among topical therapies with an intention to account for deficiencies in the outermost lipid layer of the tear film.

Piiloset Trehalose Emulsion Eye Drops was developed to target and restore the three main layers (mucin, aqueous, and lipid) of the tear film and to counteract the key etiological factors leading to dry eye. Hyaluronic acid and the oil component are intended to restore tear film instability, the hypo-osmolar composition and trehalose as an osmoprotectant are intended to protect the ocular epithelium against hyperosmolarity, and ocular surface inflammation and cellular damage are prevented by the cytoprotective and/or anti-oxidative action of hyaluronic acid, trehalose, and sacha inchi oil components. Additional water binding in the tear film is provided by hyaluronic acid, trehalose, and glycerol. Lubricating the ocular surface by high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid will extend the precorneal retention time. Adjustments made to certain physical and chemical parameters in the formulation are anticipated to improve tear film spreading and adhesion. The optically clear o/w emulsion formulation is free of preservatives, materials of animal origin, phosphates, or alcohol. The combined action of the individual components is expected to produce clinically relevant mitigation of the signs and symptoms of dry eye.

The study comprises three Parts with scheduled visits on Day 1 (all Parts) and on end-of-study date (Parts 2 and 3) to the study centre. Each study subject will participate in no more than one Part of the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kuopio, Finland, FI-70200
        • Department of Ophthalmology, Kuopio University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Ability and willingness to give informed written consent prior to any screening procedure after explanation of the nature and possible consequences of the study.
  2. Age between 18 and 80 years.
  3. At least two the following conditions (A and B):

    A. Symptomatic dry eye with OSDI score ≥20. AND B1. Tear film break-up time (TBUT) <10 seconds. OR B2. Positive ocular (corneal and conjunctival) staining pattern

  4. Body weight at least 45 kg.
  5. Under stable topical and/or systemic therapy for at least 4 weeks before the study procedures and apparent ability and willingness to abstain from other therapies until completion of the study period.
  6. Ability and willingness to self-administer eye drops.
  7. Ability and willingness to understand and fill in the OSDI questionnaire.
  8. Ability and willingness to comply with the study protocol and other study-related procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of ocular surgery, trauma, or refractive laser vision correction procedure less than 3 months earlier.
  2. Evidence of acute or chronic infection in the cornea or conjunctiva.
  3. Diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome.
  4. Unwillingness or apparent disability to discontinue contact lens use during study period and at least one week before the first dosing day.
  5. Current ocular allergy symptoms.
  6. Known allergy to any constituent of the trehalose emulsion eye drops or control eye drops.
  7. Currently pregnant, nursing or planning to become pregnant before completion of the study period.
  8. Any other condition that may, in the Investigator's opinion, jeopardize the safety or availability of the subject or adherence to the study protocol or may interfere with the interpretation of the results and would thus make the subject inappropriate for entry in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Emulsion Eye Drops
Daily treatment with Piiloset Trehalose Emulsion Eye Drops
Topical application of preservative-free multidose Piiloset Trehalose Emulsion Eye Drops 3 times daily
Active Comparator: Control Eye Drops
Daily treatment with Hyaluronic Acid Eye Drops (a CE-marked medical device)
Topical application of preservative-free multidose Hyaluronic Acid Eye Drops 3 times daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline OSDI
Time Frame: From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) is a questionnaire consisting of 12 questions subdivided into 3 subscales for measuring the frequency of dry eye symptoms, vision-related quality of life and environmental triggers during the previous week. Answers to each question are on a scale of 0 (None of the time) to 4 (All of the time). Both total OSDI and its subscale scores are on a scale of 0 to 100, calculated as follows: score = (sum of scores for questions answered/number of questions answered) x 25. Higher scores represent greater disability.
From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Change From Baseline Tear Osmolarity
Time Frame: From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Instrumental assay of tear fluid osmolarity (mOsm/L)
From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Change From Baseline TBUT
Time Frame: From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Tear film break-up time (TBUT) (s)
From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline Blink Rate
Time Frame: From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Measurement of spontaneous eyelid blinks per minute
From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Change From Baseline Ocular Protection Index (OPI)
Time Frame: From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
OPI is the ratio of TBUT/IBI (IBI, interblink interval calculated from blink rate). An OPI value >1 indicates that TBUT (s) exceeds IBI (s) and that the ocular surface is mostly tear-film protected, because tear film break-ups do not take place within spontaneous blink cycles.
From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Change From Baseline Corneal Staining
Time Frame: From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Corneal staining score is assessed as the average number of punctate dots on an ordinal scale of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 (Oxford scale) when compared to a pictorial standard. The number of dots increases on a log scale. Higher score represents more intense staining.
From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Change From Baseline Conjunctival (Temporal) Staining
Time Frame: From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Conjunctival staining score is assessed as the average number of punctate dots on an ordinal scale of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 (Oxford scale) when compared to a pictorial standard. The number of dots increases on a log scale. Higher score represents more intense staining.
From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Change From Baseline Conjunctival (Nasal) Staining
Time Frame: From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Conjunctival staining score is assessed as the average number of punctate dots on an ordinal scale of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 (Oxford scale) when compared to a pictorial standard. The number of dots increases on a log scale. Higher score represents more intense staining.
From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline Visual Acuity
Time Frame: From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Best corrected visual acuity (ETDRS charts 1 & 2, 2000 series)
From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Change From Baseline Conjunctival Redness
Time Frame: From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)

Conjunctival redness score is assessed on an ordinal scale of 0 to 4 (IER grading scale):

0 = not existing, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe. Higher score represents more intense redness.

From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Change From Baseline Lid Redness
Time Frame: From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)

Eyelid redness score is assessed on an ordinal scale of 0 to 4 (IER grading scale):

0 = not existing, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe. Higher score represents more intense redness.

From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Change From Baseline Intraocular Pressure
Time Frame: From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)
Intraocular pressure measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry (mmHg)
From baseline to Day 30 (Part 3)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kai Kaarniranta, Professor, Kuopio University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 21, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 8, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 8, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Piiloset Trehalose Emulsion Eye Drops

Subscribe