Platelets Count Alterations in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

May 17, 2019 updated by: Niguarda Hospital

Platelets Count Alterations in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Epidemiology and Prognostic Role

Platelet count alterations (thrombocytopenia and thrombocytosis) are a common condition in patients hospitalised for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), both at disease onset and in the following recovery phase.1-3 Different factors can explain this phenomenon. Thrombocytopenia could be either due to neurohormonal activation and the inflammatory process following myocardial necrosis leading to increased macrophage activation with increased clearance of platelets, or to an immuno-modulated mechanism caused by the administration of antiaggregant/anticoagulant drugs (heparin, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, P2Y12 inhibitors).

Even the invasive treatment of coronaropathy during hospitalization, with angioplasty and stent implantation procedures and/or the eventual implantation of temporary mechanical blood circulation assistant devices [aortic counterpulsation, Impella, ECMO (Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation)], could further favour the phenomenon.4 Vice versa, thrombocytosis occurring during ACS has a reactive origin, caused by increased IL-6 production which, in turn, leads to an increase in thrombopoietin formation in the liver, causing a consequent stimulatory activity on megakaryocytes.2 Different studies have demonstrated a significant correlation between platelets count disorders and patient outcome (survival during hospitalization and in the immediate follow-up).5-11 This association has, however, often been considered an epiphenomenon of the underlying pathology. Platelets count alterations are, indeed, usually consensual to other hemogram alterations (anaemia and neutropenia), an indication of a coexisting medullar insufficiency (thrombocytopenia) or other heterogenous diseases such as cancer, iron deficiency or immuno-modulated diseases, usually associated with an increase in comorbidity indexes.12 Those alterations, moreover, can usually influence changes to the therapeutic approach (reduction/suspension of recommended standard therapies) and further condition the prognosis.13 Since a few years, the investigators have been established a cardiac-haematological collaboration aiming at finding early alterations in platelets count or, more generally, in cell blood count (CBC), collegially evaluating those alterations with a cardiologist and a haematologist (even in mild cases) and scheduling, on the basis of the aforementioned evaluations, a more precise and tailored therapeutic approach toward the specific patient needs in order to minimize the downgrading of potentially life-saving therapies.14 Until now, however, no precise evaluation of the impact that this strategy had in influencing the therapeutic approach and in improving patient outcome in our population has been performed.

A retrospective evaluation of consecutive ACS patients, their clinical, biohumoral and procedural characteristics and the adopted pharmacological treatments is, therefore, an important epidemiologic tool for the characterization of this phenomenon and for identifying potential associations which could suggest possible future therapeutic developments.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Even the invasive treatment of coronaropathy during hospitalization, with angioplasty and stent implantation procedures and/or the eventual implantation of temporary mechanical blood circulation assistant devices [aortic counterpulsation, Impella, ECMO (Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation)], could further favour the phenomenon. Vice versa, thrombocytosis occurring during ACS has a reactive origin, caused by increased IL-6 production which, in turn, leads to an increase in thrombopoietin formation in the liver, causing a consequent stimulatory activity on megakaryocytes. Different studies have demonstrated a significant correlation between platelets count disorders and patient outcome (survival during hospitalization and in the immediate follow-up). This association has, however, often been considered an epiphenomenon of the underlying pathology. Platelets count alterations are, indeed, usually consensual to other hemogram alterations (anaemia and neutropenia), an indication of a coexisting medullar insufficiency (thrombocytopenia) or other heterogenous diseases such as cancer, iron deficiency or immuno-modulated diseases, usually associated with an increase in comorbidity indexes. Those alterations, moreover, can usually influence changes to the therapeutic approach (reduction/suspension of recommended standard therapies) and further condition the prognosis. Since a few years,the investigators have been established a cardiac-haematological collaboration aiming at finding early alterations in platelets count or, more generally, in cell blood count (CBC), collegially evaluating those alterations with a cardiologist and a haematologist (even in mild cases) and scheduling, on the basis of the aforementioned evaluations, a more precise and tailored therapeutic approach toward the specific patient needs in order to minimize the downgrading of potentially life-saving therapies. Until now, however, no precise evaluation of the impact that this strategy had in influencing the therapeutic approach and in improving patient outcome in our population has been performed.

A retrospective evaluation of consecutive ACS patients, their clinical, biohumoral and procedural characteristics and the adopted pharmacological treatments is, therefore, an important epidemiologic tool for the characterization of this phenomenon and for identifying potential associations which could suggest possible future therapeutic developments.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • MI
      • Milano, MI, Italy, 20162
        • Azienda Opsedaliera Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects with Acute Coronary Syndrome diagnosis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All consecutive ACS subjects hospitalized in the Cardiology 1 - UTIC department of ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda between 2014 and 2017

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years
  • Subjects admitted with ACS diagnosis but not confirmed at discharge

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients
ACS subjects hospitalized in the Cardiology 1 - UTIC department of ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda between 2014 and 2017
To profile each subject enrolled in the study, anamnesis and different personal, clinical, procedural, pharmacological and follow up related variables will be collected. Data collection, maintenance and analysis will be performed using a database that will be developed, managed and updated by study promoter, in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
net adverse clinical events NACE
Time Frame: 2014 to 2017
the composite of a list of clinical events
2014 to 2017

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
death
Time Frame: 2014 to 2017
patient's death for all causes at follow up
2014 to 2017
hospitalization
Time Frame: 2014 to 2017
duration of patient's hospitalization
2014 to 2017

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 25, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 17, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Undecided yet

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Coronary Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Epidemiological data collection

Subscribe