- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03595176
Disrupt CAD III With the Shockwave Coronary IVL System
May 17, 2023 updated by: Shockwave Medical, Inc.
Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Global IDE Study of the Shockwave Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) System With the Shockwave C2 Coronary IVL Catheter in Calcified Coronary Arteries
The study design is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, global IDE study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Shockwave Medical Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) System in de novo, calcified, stenotic coronary arteries prior to stenting.
Disrupt CAD III is being conducted as a staged pivotal study.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Subject Population: Subjects ≥ 18 years of age with de novo, calcified coronary artery lesions presenting with stable, unstable or silent ischemia that are suitable for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Approximately 392 subjects at 50 sites will be enrolled.
A minimum of 50% of the total enrollment will come from the United States.Subjects will be followed through discharge, 30 days, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
431
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63050
- Clinique des Domes - Pole Sante Republique
-
Massy, France, 91300
- Institute Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud
-
-
Cedex 3
-
Toulouse, Cedex 3, France, 31076
- Clinique Pasteur
-
-
-
-
-
Berlin, Germany, 12203
- Charite - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
-
Neuss, Germany, 41464
- Rheinland Klinikum Neuss GmbH - Lukaskrankenhaus Neuss
-
-
CET
-
Marburg, CET, Germany
- Universitaetsklinikum Giessen and Marburg GmbH
-
-
-
-
-
Clydebank, United Kingdom, G81 4DY
- Golden Jubilee National Hospital
-
London, United Kingdom, SE5 9RS
- King's College Hospital
-
London, United Kingdom, EC1A 7BE
- St. Bartholomew's Hospital
-
-
-
-
Arizona
-
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85258
- Honor Health
-
-
California
-
La Jolla, California, United States, 92037
- Scripps Clinic
-
La Jolla, California, United States, 92037
- University of California, San Diego (UCSD) - Medical Center
-
Orange, California, United States, 92868
- St. Joseph Hospital
-
Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
- Yale New Haven Hospital
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
- MedStar Washington Hospital Center
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
- Emory University Hospital Midtown
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30309
- Piedmont Heart Institute
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Northwestern University
-
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, United States, 60540
- Advocate Health and Hospitals Corporation - Edward Hospital
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46290
- St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana, LLC
-
-
Louisiana
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70121
- Ochsner Clinic Foundation
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21218
- MedStar Union Memorial Hospital
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
- Massachusetts General Hospital
-
-
Michigan
-
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
- Henry Ford Hospital
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55407
- Minneapolis Heart Institute
-
-
Mississippi
-
Tupelo, Mississippi, United States, 38801
- North Mississippi Medical Center
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
- Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City
-
-
New Jersey
-
Browns Mills, New Jersey, United States, 08015
- Deborah Heart and Lung Center
-
-
New York
-
Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
- Montefiore Medical Center
-
New York, New York, United States, 10016
- New York University (NYU) Langone Medical Center
-
New York, New York, United States, 10065
- Columbia University Medical Center/ New York Presbyterian
-
Roslyn, New York, United States, 11576
- St. Francis Hospital
-
-
North Carolina
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
- Durham VA Health Care System
-
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27607
- NC Heart and Vascular
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
- The Christ Hospital
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, United States, 19096
- Bryn Mawr Hospital
-
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States, 17822
- Geisinger Medical Center
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
-
Wormleysburg, Pennsylvania, United States, 17043
- Pinnacle Health Cardiovascular Institute Inc.
-
-
Rhode Island
-
Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02906
- The Miriam Hospital
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75226
- Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- Houston Methodist Hospital
-
-
Vermont
-
Burlington, Vermont, United States, 05401
- University of Vermont
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
- University of Washington Medical Center
-
-
West Virginia
-
Charleston, West Virginia, United States, 25304
- Charleston Area Medical Center (CAMC) - Health Education & Research Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject is ≥18 years of age
- Subjects with native coronary artery disease (including stable or unstable angina and silent ischemia) suitable for PCI
- For patients with unstable ischemic heart disease, biomarkers (troponin or CK-MB) must be less than or equal to the upper limit of lab normal within 12 hours prior to the procedure (note: if both labs are drawn, both must be normal).
For patients with stable ischemic heart disease, biomarkers may be drawn prior to the procedure or at the time of the procedure from the side port of the sheath.
- If drawn prior to the procedure, biomarkers (troponin or CK-MB) must be less than or equal to the upper limit of lab normal within 12 hours of the procedure (note: if both labs are drawn, both must be normal).
- If biomarkers are drawn at the time of the procedure from the side port of the sheath prior to any intervention, biomarker results do not need to be analyzed prior to enrollment (note: CK-MB is required if drawn from the sheath).
- Left ventricular ejection fraction >25% within 6 months (note: in the case of multiple assessments of LVEF, the measurement closest to enrollment will be used for this criteria; may be assessed at time of index procedure)
- Subject or legally authorized representative, signs a written Informed Consent form to participate in the study, prior to any study-mandated procedures
Lesions in non-target vessels requiring PCI may be treated either:
- >30 days prior to the study procedure if the procedure was unsuccessful or complicated; or
- >24 hours prior to the study procedure if the procedure was successful and uncomplicated (defined as a final lesion angiographic diameter stenosis <30% and TIMI 3 flow (visually assessed) for all non-target lesions and vessels without perforation, cardiac arrest or need for defibrillation or cardioversion or hypotension/heart failure requiring mechanical or intravenous hemodynamic support or intubation, and with no post-procedure biomarker elevation >normal; or
- >30 days after the study procedure
Angiographic Inclusion Criteria
- The target lesion must be a de novo coronary lesion that has not been previously treated with any interventional procedure
Single de novo target lesion stenosis of protected LMCA, or LAD, RCA or LCX (or of their branches) with:
- Stenosis of ≥70% and <100% or
- Stenosis ≥50% and <70% (visually assessed) with evidence of ischemia via positive stress test, or fractional flow reserve value ≤0.80, or iFR <0.90 or IVUS or OCT minimum lumen area ≤4.0 mm²
- The target vessel reference diameter must be ≥2.5 mm and ≤4.0 mm
- The lesion length must not exceed 40 mm
- The target vessel must have TIMI flow 3 at baseline (visually assessed; may be assessed after pre- dilatation)
- Evidence of calcification at the lesion site by, a) angiography, with fluoroscopic radio-opacities noted without cardiac motion prior to contrast injection involving both sides of the arterial wall in at least one location and total length of calcium of at least 15 mm and extending partially into the target lesion, OR by b) IVUS or OCT, with presence of ≥270 degrees of calcium on at least 1 cross section
- Ability to pass a 0.014" guide wire across the lesion
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any comorbidity or condition which may reduce compliance with this protocol, including follow-up visits
- Subject is a member of a vulnerable population as defined in 21 CFR 56.111, including individuals with mental disability, persons in nursing homes, children, impoverished persons, persons in emergency situations, homeless persons, nomads, refugees, and those incapable of giving informed consent. Vulnerable populations also may include members of a group with a hierarchical structure such as university students, subordinate hospital and laboratory personnel, employees of the Sponsor, members of the armed forces, and persons kept in detention
- Subject is participating in another research study involving an investigational agent (pharmaceutical, biologic, or medical device) that has not reached the primary endpoint
- Subject is pregnant or nursing (a negative pregnancy test is required for women of child-bearing potential within 7 days prior to enrollment)
- Unable to tolerate dual antiplatelet therapy (i.e., aspirin, and either clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor) for at least 6 months (for patients not on oral anticoagulation)
- Subject has an allergy to imaging contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated
- Subject experienced an acute MI (STEMI or non-STEMI) within 30 days prior to index procedure, defined as a clinical syndrome consistent with an acute coronary syndrome with troponin or CK-MB greater than 1 times the local laboratory's upper limit of normal
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV heart failure
- Renal failure with serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dL or chronic dialysis
- History of a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months, or any prior intracranial hemorrhage or permanent neurologic deficit
- Active peptic ulcer or upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within 6 months
- Untreated pre-procedural hemoglobin <10 g/dL or intention to refuse blood transfusions if one should become necessary
- Coagulopathy, including but not limited to platelet count <100,000 or International Normalized ratio (INR) > 1.7 (INR is only required in subjects who have taken warfarin within 2 weeks of enrollment)
- Subject has a hypercoagulable disorder such as polycythemia vera, platelet count >750,000 or other disorders
- Uncontrolled diabetes defined as a HbA1c greater than or equal to 10%
- Subject has an active systemic infection on the day of the index procedure with either fever, leukocytosis or requiring intravenous antibiotics
- Subjects in cardiogenic shock or with clinical evidence of left-sided heart failure (S3 gallop, pulmonary rales, oliguria, or hypoxemia)
- Uncontrolled severe hypertension (systolic BP >180 mm Hg or diastolic BP >110 mm Hg)
- Subjects with a life expectancy of less than 1 year
- Non-coronary interventional or surgical structural heart procedures (e.g., TAVR, MitraClip, LAA or PFO occlusion, etc.) within 30 days prior to the index procedure
- Planned non-coronary interventional or surgical structural heart procedures (e.g., TAVR, MitraClip, LAA or PFO occlusion, etc.) within 30 days after the index procedure
- Subject refusing or not a candidate for emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery
- Planned use of atherectomy, scoring or cutting balloon, or any investigational device other than lithotripsy
- High SYNTAX Score (≥33) if assessed as standard of care, unless the local heart team has met and recommends PCI is the most appropriate treatment for the patient
- Unprotected left main diameter stenosis >30%
- Target vessel is excessively tortuous defined as the presence of two or more bends >90º or three or more bends >75º
- Definite or possible thrombus (by angiography or intravascular imaging) in the target vessel
- Evidence of aneurysm in target vessel within 10 mm of the target lesion
- Target lesion is an ostial location (LAD, LCX, or RCA, within 5 mm of ostium) or an unprotected left main lesion
- Target lesion is a bifurcation with ostial diameter stenosis ≥30%
- Second lesion with >50% stenosis in the same target vessel as the target lesion including its side branches
- Target lesion is located in a native vessel that can only be reached by going through a saphenous vein or arterial bypass graft
- Previous stent within the target vessel implanted within the last year
- Previous stent within 10 mm of the target lesion regardless of the timing of its implantation
- Angiographic evidence of a dissection in the target vessel at baseline or after guidewire passage
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Coronary Lithotripsy System
All subjects will receive lithotripsy treatment from the Shockwave Medical Coronary IVL System
|
Deliver Lithotripsy to the target vessel prior to placing a coronary stent.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Experienced Freedom From Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) Within 30 Days Post-procedure
Time Frame: within 30 days of index procedure
|
The primary safety endpoint was freedom from MACE at 30 days - a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR).
The primary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 30 days of index procedure
|
|
Number of Participants With Procedural Success (Residual Stenosis <50%)
Time Frame: 12-24 hours post procedure or at discharge, whichever is earlier, but at least 6 hours post procedure
|
The primary effectiveness endpoint was Procedural Success defined as stent delivery with a residual in-stent stenosis <50% (core laboratory assessed) and without in-hospital MACE.
The primary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
12-24 hours post procedure or at discharge, whichever is earlier, but at least 6 hours post procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Device Crossing Success
Time Frame: at end of procedure
|
Device Crossing Success defined as the ability to deliver the IVL catheter across the target lesion, and delivery of lithotripsy without serious angiographic complications immediately after IVL.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
at end of procedure
|
|
Number of Participants With Angiographic Success (Residual Stenosis <50%)
Time Frame: at end of procedure
|
Angiographic Success defined as stent delivery with <50% residual stenosis and without serious angiographic complications.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
at end of procedure
|
|
Number of Participants With Procedural Success (Residual Stenosis <=30%)
Time Frame: 12-24 hours post procedure or at discharge, whichever is earlier, but at least 6 hours post procedure
|
Procedural Success defined as stent delivery with a residual stenosis <=30% (core laboratory assessed) and without in-hospital MACE.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
12-24 hours post procedure or at discharge, whichever is earlier, but at least 6 hours post procedure
|
|
Number of Participants With Angiographic Success (Residual Stenosis <=30%)
Time Frame: at end of procedure
|
Angiographic Success defined as stent delivery with <=30% residual stenosis and without serious angiographic complications.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
at end of procedure
|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Angiographic Complications
Time Frame: at end of procedure
|
Serious Angiographic Complications defined as severe dissection (Type D to F), perforation, abrupt closure, and persistent slow flow or persistent no reflow.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
at end of procedure
|
|
MACE Rate at 6 Months
Time Frame: within 6 months of index procedure
|
MACE at 6 months - a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) - is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 6 months of index procedure
|
|
MACE Rate at 12 Months
Time Frame: within 12 months of index procedure
|
MACE at 12 months - a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) - is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 12 months of index procedure
|
|
Target Lesion Failure (TLF) Rate at 30 Days
Time Frame: within 30 days of index procedure
|
Target lesion failure (TLF) is defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) by percutaneous or surgical methods.
30 day rates are presented as proportions.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 30 days of index procedure
|
|
Target Lesion Failure (TLF) Rate at 6 Months
Time Frame: within 6 months of index procedure
|
TLF is defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) by percutaneous or surgical methods.
For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 6 months of index procedure
|
|
Target Lesion Failure (TLF) Rate at 12 Months
Time Frame: within 12 months of index procedure
|
TLF is defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) by percutaneous or surgical methods.
For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 12 months of index procedure
|
|
All-Cause Death Rate at 30 Days
Time Frame: within 30 days of index procedure
|
30-day rates are presented as proportions.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 30 days of index procedure
|
|
All-Cause Death Rate at 6 Months
Time Frame: within 6 months of index procedure
|
All-cause death at 6 months is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 6 months of index procedure
|
|
All-Cause Death Rate at 12 Months
Time Frame: within 12 months of index procedure
|
All-cause death at 12 months is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 12 months of index procedure
|
|
Cardiac Death Rate at 30 Days
Time Frame: within 30 days of index procedure
|
30-day rates are presented as proportions.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 30 days of index procedure
|
|
Cardiac Death Rate at 6 Months
Time Frame: within 6 months of index procedure
|
Cardiac death at 6 months is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 6 months of index procedure
|
|
Cardiac Death Rate at 12 Months
Time Frame: within 12 months of index procedure
|
Cardiac death at 12 months is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 12 months of index procedure
|
|
MI Rate at 30 Days
Time Frame: within 30 days of index procedure
|
30-day rates are presented as proportions.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 30 days of index procedure
|
|
MI Rate at 6 Months
Time Frame: within 6 months of index procedure
|
MI is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate at 6 months.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 6 months of index procedure
|
|
MI Rate at 12 Months
Time Frame: within 12 months of index procedure
|
MI is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate at 12 months.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 12 months of index procedure
|
|
Target Vessel-Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI) Rate at 30 Days
Time Frame: within 30 days of index procedure
|
30-day rates are presented as proportions.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 30 days of index procedure
|
|
TV-MI Rate at 6 Months
Time Frame: within 6 months of index procedure
|
TV-MI is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate at 6 months.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 6 months of index procedure
|
|
TV-MI Rate at 12 Months
Time Frame: within 12 months of index procedure
|
TV-MI is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate at 12 months.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 12 months of index procedure
|
|
Procedural MI Rate at 30 Days
Time Frame: within 30 days of index procedure
|
Periprocedural MI defined as CK-MB > 3x upper limit of lab normal (ULN).
30-day rates are presented as proportions.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 30 days of index procedure
|
|
Procedural MI Rate at 6 Months
Time Frame: within 6 months of index procedure
|
Periprocedural MI defined as CK-MB > 3x upper limit of lab normal (ULN).
For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 6 months of index procedure
|
|
Procedural MI Rate at 12 Months
Time Frame: within 12 months of index procedure
|
Periprocedural MI defined as CK-MB > 3x upper limit of lab normal (ULN).
For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 12 months of index procedure
|
|
Non-Procedural MI Rate at 30 Days
Time Frame: within 30 days of index procedure
|
Non-Procedural MI defined as spontaneous MI beyond discharge (4th Universal Definition).
30-day rates are presented as proportions.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 30 days of index procedure
|
|
Non-Procedural MI Rate at 6 Months
Time Frame: within 6 months of index procedure
|
Non-Procedural MI defined as spontaneous MI beyond discharge (4th Universal Definition).
For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 6 months of index procedure
|
|
Non-Procedural MI Rate at 12 Months
Time Frame: within 12 months of index procedure
|
Non-Procedural MI defined as spontaneous MI beyond discharge (4th Universal Definition).
For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 12 months of index procedure
|
|
Ischemia-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) Rate at 30 Days
Time Frame: within 30 days of index procedure
|
30-day rates are presented as proportions.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 30 days of index procedure
|
|
ID-TVR Rate at 6 Months
Time Frame: within 6 months of index procedure
|
For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 6 months of index procedure
|
|
ID-TVR Rate at 12 Months
Time Frame: within 12 months of index procedure
|
For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 12 months of index procedure
|
|
Ischemia-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) Rate at 30 Days
Time Frame: within 30 days of index procedure
|
30-day rates are presented as proportions.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 30 days of index procedure
|
|
ID-TLR Rate at 6 Months
Time Frame: within 6 months of index procedure
|
For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 6 months of index procedure
|
|
ID-TLR Rate at 12 Months
Time Frame: within 12 months of index procedure
|
For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 12 months of index procedure
|
|
Non-ID-TVR Rate at 30 Days
Time Frame: within 30 days of index procedure
|
30-day rates are presented as proportions.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 30 days of index procedure
|
|
Non-ID-TVR Rate at 6 Months
Time Frame: within 6 months of index procedure
|
For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 6 months of index procedure
|
|
Non-ID-TVR Rate at 12 Months
Time Frame: within 12 months of index procedure
|
For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 12 months of index procedure
|
|
Non-ID-TLR Rate at 30 Days
Time Frame: within 30 days of index procedure
|
30-day rates are presented as proportions.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 30 days of index procedure
|
|
Non-ID-TLR Rate at 6 Months
Time Frame: within 6 months of index procedure
|
For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 6 months of index procedure
|
|
Non-ID-TLR Rate at 12 Months
Time Frame: within 12 months of index procedure
|
For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 12 months of index procedure
|
|
Any Revascularizations Rate at 30 Days
Time Frame: within 30 days of index procedure
|
Any revascularizations (ID and non-ID) at 30 days.
30-day rates are presented as proportions.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 30 days of index procedure
|
|
Any Revascularizations Rate at 6 Months
Time Frame: within 6 months of index procedure
|
Any revascularizations (ID and non-ID) at 6 months, presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 6 months of index procedure
|
|
Any Revascularizations Rate at 12 Months
Time Frame: within 12 months of index procedure
|
Any revascularizations (ID and non-ID) at 12 months, presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 12 months of index procedure
|
|
Stent Thrombosis Rate at 30 Days
Time Frame: within 30 days of index procedure
|
Any stent thrombosis (definite, probable, definite or probable) according to Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria, as referenced from Cutlip, D.E. et al.
Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials.
Circ.
2007.115.2344-51.
30-day rates are presented as proportions.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 30 days of index procedure
|
|
Stent Thrombosis Rate at 6 Months
Time Frame: within 6 months of index procedure
|
Any stent thrombosis (definite, probable, definite or probable) according to Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria, as referenced from Cutlip, D.E. et al.
Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials.
Circ.
2007.115.2344-51.
For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 6 months of index procedure
|
|
Stent Thrombosis Rate at 12 Months
Time Frame: within 12 months of index procedure
|
Any stent thrombosis (definite, probable, definite or probable) according to Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria, as referenced from Cutlip, D.E. et al.
Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials.
Circ.
2007.115.2344-51.
For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 12 months of index procedure
|
|
Rate of MI Using the 4th Universal Definition at 30 Days
Time Frame: within 30 days of index procedure
|
30-day rates are presented as proportions.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 30 days of index procedure
|
|
Rate of MI Using the 4th Universal Definition at 6 Months
Time Frame: within 6 months of index procedure
|
For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 6 months of index procedure
|
|
Rate of MI Using the 4th Universal Definition at 12 Months
Time Frame: within 12 months of index procedure
|
For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 12 months of index procedure
|
|
Rate of MI Using the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Definition at 30 Days
Time Frame: within 30 days of index procedure
|
30-day rates are presented as proportions.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 30 days of index procedure
|
|
Rate of MI Using the SCAI Definition at 6 Months
Time Frame: within 6 months of index procedure
|
For 6 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 6 months of index procedure
|
|
Rate of MI Using the SCAI Definition at 12 Months
Time Frame: within 12 months of index procedure
|
For 12 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 12 months of index procedure
|
|
MACE Rate at 24 Months
Time Frame: within 24 months of index procedure
|
MACE at 24 months - a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) - is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 24 months of index procedure
|
|
Target Lesion Failure (TLF) Rate at 24 Months
Time Frame: within 24 months of index procedure
|
TLF is defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) by percutaneous or surgical methods.
For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 24 months of index procedure
|
|
All-Cause Death Rate at 24 Months
Time Frame: within 24 months of index procedure
|
All-cause death at 24 months is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 24 months of index procedure
|
|
Cardiac Death Rate at 24 Months
Time Frame: within 24 months of index procedure
|
Cardiac death at 24 months is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 24 months of index procedure
|
|
MI Rate at 24 Months
Time Frame: within 24 months of index procedure
|
MI is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate at 24 months.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 24 months of index procedure
|
|
TV-MI Rate at 24 Months
Time Frame: within 24 months of index procedure
|
TV-MI is presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate at 24 months.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 24 months of index procedure
|
|
Procedural MI Rate at 24 Months
Time Frame: within 24 months of index procedure
|
Periprocedural MI defined as CK-MB > 3x upper limit of lab normal (ULN).
For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 24 months of index procedure
|
|
Non-Procedural MI Rate at 24 Months
Time Frame: within 24 months of index procedure
|
Non-Procedural MI defined as spontaneous MI beyond discharge (4th Universal Definition).
For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 24 months of index procedure
|
|
ID-TVR Rate at 24 Months
Time Frame: within 24 months of index procedure
|
For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 24 months of index procedure
|
|
ID-TLR Rate at 24 Months
Time Frame: within 24 months of index procedure
|
For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 24 months of index procedure
|
|
Non-ID-TVR Rate at 24 Months
Time Frame: within 24 months of index procedure
|
For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 24 months of index procedure
|
|
Non-ID-TLR Rate at 24 Months
Time Frame: within 24 months of index procedure
|
For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 24 months of index procedure
|
|
Any Revascularizations Rate at 24 Months
Time Frame: within 24 months of index procedure
|
Any revascularizations (ID and non-ID) at 24 months, presented as a Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 24 months of index procedure
|
|
Stent Thrombosis Rate at 24 Months
Time Frame: within 24 months of index procedure
|
Any stent thrombosis (definite, probable, definite or probable) according to Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria, as referenced from Cutlip, D.E. et al.
Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials.
Circ.
2007.115.2344-51.
For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 24 months of index procedure
|
|
Rate of MI Using the 4th Universal Definition at 24 Months
Time Frame: within 24 months of index procedure
|
For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 24 months of index procedure
|
|
Rate of MI Using the SCAI Definition at 24 Months
Time Frame: within 24 months of index procedure
|
For 24 months, rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimated event rates.
The secondary endpoints were analyzed using the Pivotal Analysis Set.
|
within 24 months of index procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Dean J Kereiakes, MD,FACC,FSCAI, The Christ Hospital Heart and Vascular Center and The Carl and Edyth Lindner Center for Research and Education at The Christ Hospital
- Study Chair: Gregg W Stone, MD,FACC,FSCAI, Columbia University
- Study Chair: Jonathan Hill, MD, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Kereiakes DJ, Di Mario C, Riley RF, Fajadet J, Shlofmitz RA, Saito S, Ali ZA, Klein AJ, Price MJ, Hill JM, Stone GW. Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Calcified Coronary Lesions: Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of the Disrupt CAD Studies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun 28;14(12):1337-1348. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.04.015. Epub 2021 May 3.
- Hill JM, Kereiakes DJ, Shlofmitz RA, Klein AJ, Riley RF, Price MJ, Herrmann HC, Bachinsky W, Waksman R, Stone GW; Disrupt CAD III Investigators. Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 1;76(22):2635-2646. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.603. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
- Kereiakes DJ, Hill JM, Ben-Yehuda O, Maehara A, Alexander B, Stone GW. Evaluation of safety and efficacy of coronary intravascular lithotripsy for treatment of severely calcified coronary stenoses: Design and rationale for the Disrupt CAD III trial. Am Heart J. 2020 Jul;225:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 9, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 7, 2020
Study Completion (Actual)
April 10, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 12, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
July 23, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 19, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 17, 2023
Last Verified
May 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CP 61982
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Myocardial Infarction
-
Beijing Northland Biotech. Co., Ltd.Not yet recruitingAcute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) | Acute Myocardial Infarction of Anterior Wall | Acute Myocardial Infarction With ST Elevation | Acute Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation | Acute Myocardial Infarction of Left VentricleChina
-
University Medical Centre LjubljanaCompletedCardiac Arrest | Postresuscitation Syndrome | Myocardial Infarction (ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction)Slovenia
-
Fundacio Privada Mon Clinic BarcelonaMiracor Medical SAWithdrawn
-
Samsung Medical CenterThe Korean Society of CardiologyNot yet recruiting
-
Azienda ULSS 5 PolesanaUniversity of PadovaUnknownMyocardial Infarction, Acute | ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction | Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (nSTEMI)Italy
-
Stiftung Institut fuer HerzinfarktforschungGlaxoSmithKline; University Hospital Muenster; Klinikum NürnbergCompletedMyocardial Infarction | ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction | Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial InfarctionGermany
-
Population Health Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Boston Scientific CorporationCompletedST Elevation Myocardial Infarction | Non ST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionUnited States, Spain, Netherlands, Canada, Australia, Serbia, Egypt, Switzerland, Hungary, United Kingdom, France, Czechia, Nepal, North Macedonia
-
Harbin Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingNon-stenting Treatment Strategy for Acute Myocardial Infarction With Non-severe Stenosis(EROSION IV)Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) | ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction(STEMI) | Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction(NSTEMI)China
-
University of LeedsUniversity College, LondonCompletedST-elevation Myocardial Infarction | Non ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction
-
Bispebjerg HospitalOdense University Hospital; Zealand University Hospital; Aarhus University Hospital and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingST Elevation Myocardial Infarction | Acute Myocardial Infarction | Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (nSTEMI)Denmark
Clinical Trials on Lithotripsy
-
The Cleveland ClinicCompleted
-
Mahidol UniversitySiriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.Recruiting
-
Shockwave Medical, Inc.Massachusetts General Hospital; Yale University; IQVIA Pty LtdActive, not recruitingPeripheral Arterial DiseaseJapan
-
Rush University Medical CenterRecruitingCholedocholithiasis | Pancreatic Duct StoneUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaCompleted
-
District Headquarters Teaching Hospital SahiwalCompleted
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterCompletedNephrolithiasisUnited States
-
Shockwave Medical, Inc.Massachusetts General Hospital; Medpace, Inc.; Yale Cardiovascular Research Group and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingCarotid Artery Diseases | Carotid Artery Calcification
-
Sismanoglio General HospitalRecruitingComplication,Postoperative | Lithiasis, UrinaryGreece